Thursday, March 31, 2011

"TINY CHURCH FINDS ORIGINAL KING JAMES BIBLE"



From CNN Belief Blog:
Hilmarton, England (CNN) - A little English village church has just made a remarkable discovery.

The ornate old Bible that had been sitting in plain view on a table near the last row of pews for longer than anyone could remember is an original King James Bible - one of perhaps 200 surviving 400-year-old original editions of arguably the most important book ever printed in English.

In fact, the Bible at St. Laurence Church in Hilmarton, England, was sitting right under a hand-lettered sign saying it was an original.

The sign said it had been found in "the parish chest" in 1857, that the cover had been added, and that it was the second of the two impressions published in 1611 - the year of first publication.
....

The people of St. Laurence Church are now trying to raise money to build a special case so they can keep their Bible in use and on regular display.

That would make the church more or less unique so far as Goff knows, although she speculated that there just might be a few village churches still using their 400-year-old Bibles.

"It's possible there are one or two churches that have gone on doing it and they just haven't thought to say," she said.

"People are now beginning to realize the value of this particular edition. This is the 400th anniversary and there is a lot more emphasis on it," she said.

"They value it. They want to keep it and they want to use it."

I love stories like this one from St Lawrence, of treasures hidden in plain sight in very ordinary places.

Thanks to Ann V. for the link.

6 comments:

  1. Why did it take them so long tho? ... :( Did no one ever consult the pages of that particular Bible? ... I'm not saying it's not a happy story in the long run.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Amelia, this story is a well-needed tonic for the day.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Cathy, it seems the parishioners used the Bible but didn't know for sure what they had, and they never had it examined by an expert. Imagine! Printed in 1611!

    And if you read the entire article or watch the video, you see that it was a printing error that helped authenticate the book and lack of another printing error that pin-pointed that it was from the second printing.

    ReplyDelete
  4. King James was probably gay (or at least bi). Here is a link to some of the passionately affectionate letters he wrote to his favourite, George Villiers, Duke of Buckingham (whose bedroom at Apethorpe Hall was joined to King James's by a secret passageway only discovered in 2004): http://rictornorton.co.uk/kingjame.htm

    ReplyDelete
  5. Cathy, I had heard of the affair before, but I had not read the love letters.

    ReplyDelete

Anonymous commenters, please sign a name, any name, to distinguish one anonymous commenter from another. Thank you.