From Nicholas D. Kristof at the New York Times:When he was alive, Ambassador Richard Holbrooke was effectively gagged, unable to comment on what he saw as missteps of the Obama administration that he served. But as we face a crisis in Pakistan after the killing of Osama bin Laden, it’s worth listening to Holbrooke’s counsel — from beyond the grave.
As one of America’s finest strategic thinkers and special envoy to the Af-Pak region, Holbrooke represented the administration — but also chafed at aspects of the White House approach. In particular, he winced at the overreliance on military force, for it reminded him of Vietnam.
“There are structural similarities between Afghanistan and Vietnam,” he noted, in scattered reflections now in the hands of his widow, Kati Marton.
“He thought that this could become Obama’s Vietnam,” Marton recalled. “Some of the conversations in the Situation Room reminded him of conversations in the Johnson White House. When he raised that, Obama didn’t want to hear it.”
That Obama didn't want to hear Richard Holbrooke's counsel is unfortunate, indeed.
From the Army Times:
KABUL, Afghanistan — Four American soldiers serving with NATO forces in Afghanistan died Monday in an explosion in the country's south, NATO and a defense department official said, bringing home the human cost of the U.S.-led push into Taliban strongholds.
The official said they were hit by an improvised explosive device. He spoke on condition of anonymity because relatives of those killed were still being notified. The latest deaths make a total of 16 NATO service members killed so far this month, and 167 so far this year.
What is it about being in the Oval Office that blinds presidents to the reality that prolonging a war that goes nowhere, even as members of the military and civilians continue to be maimed and killed, will accomplish nothing worthwhile? The war in Afghanistan has now become Obama's war. What is the president's view of the endgame?
Vali Nasr, a member of Holbrooke’s team at the State Department, puts it this way: “He understood from his experience that every conflict has to end at the negotiating table.”
Why not sooner, rather than later?
Read Kristof's column in its entirely for its valuable analysis of Holbrooke's views on our relations with Pakistan.
As for Pakistan, Holbrooke told me and others that because of its size and nuclear weaponry, it was center stage; Afghanistan was a sideshow.
“A stable Afghanistan is not essential; a stable Pakistan is essential,” he noted, in the musings he left behind.
That Obama will reconsider Holbrooke's wise counsel now that he has passed on is surely too much to hope for, but I hope anyway.
If the president is re-elected I'm hoping he'll do what he knows he has to do, i.e., get out of Afganistan. He can do that much more easily as a lame duck, although it could make it harder for a Democrat to be elected after him. That's because the Republicans will scream endlessly that "Obama and the Democrats 'lost' Afganistan, the terrorists won, we're all doomed etc., etc., yada yada yada" hoping to instill even more fear into the voting public than they already have. Ya know, for the eight billion dollars a month we spend in Afganistan we could buy ourselves some really good health care.
ReplyDeleteBex, I hope the president begins to phase out our military involvement in Afghanistan before the next election. I don't mean stop all engagement with the country but begin to withdraw troops and negotiate with the Taliban.
ReplyDeleteAnd yes, think what 8 billion could buy in the way of health care.