We are saddened that OWS protestors chose to ignore yesterday’s messages from Archbishop Tutu, from the Presiding Bishop of the Episcopal Church, Katharine Jefferts Schori, and from Bishop of New York Mark S. Sisk. Bishop Tutu said: “In a country where all people can vote and Trinity’s door to dialogue is open, it is not necessary to forcibly break into property.” The Presiding Bishop said: “Other facilities of Trinity continue to be open to support the Occupy movement, for which I give great thanks. It is regrettable that Occupy members feel it is necessary to provoke potential legal and police action by attempting to trespass on other parish property…I would urge all concerned to stand down and seek justice in ways that do not further alienate potential allies.” Bishop Sisk said: “The movement should not be used to justify breaking the law nor is it necessary to break into property for the movement to continue.”Now I probably should post the Rev Cooper's statement without editorial comment, but I can't resist adding my 2 cents. In my humble opinion, the statement is pretty lame. It appears to me that the rector asked for statements from the big guns ahead of time so he could quote them to back up his own words, as though his statement wouldn't stand on its own.
OWS protestors call out for social and economic justice; Trinity has been supporting these goals for more than 300 years. The protestors say they want to improve housing and economic development; Trinity is actively engaged in such efforts in the poorest neighborhoods in New York City and indeed around the world. We do not, however, believe that erecting a tent city at Duarte Square enhances their mission or ours. The vacant lot has no facilities to sustain a winter encampment. In good conscience and faith, we strongly believe to do so would be wrong, unsafe, unhealthy, and potentially injurious. We will continue to provide places of refuge and the responsible use of our facilities in the Wall Street area. We are gratified by the support we have received from so many in the community.
-The Rev. Dr. James H. Cooper, Rector of Trinity Church
Are we truly 'a country where all people can vote'? I don't think so. Even now, evidence shows that Republican governors work overtime to make it difficult for certain certain citizens to vote.
Folks keep saying the protestors should be barred from this place or that place because of 'health and safety' concerns, or because 'it's complicated', but it's really not. OWS seeks a place of refuge, and why not let them have the barren plot of land until the spring? They may even decide to move along before spring. Isn't the church to be about offering refuge? I know the folks at Trinity are not bad guys, and I know Trinity does much good in the community and around the world, but they chose to take the safe side against OWS, which means that they lost the opportunity to stand in witness with them against power and corruption.
I think of the Magnificat:
And Mary said,Don't blame me for the headline. Blame my friend who must not be named.
‘My soul magnifies the Lord,
and my spirit rejoices in God my Saviour,
for he has looked with favour on the lowliness of his servant.
Surely, from now on all generations will call me blessed;
for the Mighty One has done great things for me,
and holy is his name.
His mercy is for those who fear him
from generation to generation.
He has shown strength with his arm;
he has scattered the proud in the thoughts of their hearts.
He has brought down the powerful from their thrones,
and lifted up the lowly;
he has filled the hungry with good things,
and sent the rich away empty.
He has helped his servant Israel,
in remembrance of his mercy,
according to the promise he made to our ancestors,
to Abraham and to his descendants for ever.’
UPDATE: Since her husband is in jail, Brook Packard posted at Occupied Bishop, Bp. Packard's blog, giving an account of her day. Please follow the link in her post to Elizabeth Drescher's report at Religious Dispatches, which provides further information.
Considering how much property TWS owns, it seems to me they could make an alternative offer, even an indoor one for the winter.
ReplyDeleteI could be wrong, but I suspect the hand of real estate attorneys in this.
Ten Billion Dollars?
ReplyDeleteWhat does anyone calling themselves as Church in the living Body of Christ need with ten billiob dollars?
As to the objections by ++Katherine and the Bishop of New York that the site isn't/wouldn't be safe: I find their 'concern' rather paternalistic and condescending. The OCW folks have shown themselves to be compassionate, capable adults able to look after themselves and each other time and time again.
I thought I'd never find myself saying this- but shame on you +Katherine.
Once again the purple shirts break our hearts.
According to HuffPost, someone held up a sign today that read "Trinity hero of 9/11, be a hero again!"
ReplyDeleteouch.
Counterlight, when the institutional church plays safe, it's almost always in order to suspect that the church is following the advice of lawyers, who will seldom tell their clients to take risks, even for a good cause.
ReplyDeleteWhy couldn't Trinity issue an order to OWS to stay away from the square, and then quietly ask the cops to stand down, even if OWS squatted in the square? Would that be impossible?
David@Montreal, this is not a pretty picture of the Episcopal Church. I think the rector distorted Abp. Tutu's statement by picking out the one statement from his clarification that would support Trinity's demand to OWS to stay away from Duarte Square.
In kindergarten kids are often taught that it's rude not to share, a lesson that the leadership of TWS has arguably forgotten. Kindergartners are also taught that if people refuse to share, you don't just take from, a lesson that the OWS folk also seem to have forgotten.
ReplyDelete[I was posting here, and the site suddenly freaked out on me! Kept scrolling. Maybe a divine message to keep my remarks SHORT? ;-/]
ReplyDeleteI'm very annoyed that the Rector, Dr Cooper, seems to be saying +Desmond Tutu is on his (TWS's) side in all this. I read Our Desmond's two messages re OWS&TWS, and that is NOT the impression I got! [As always, Desmond can speak FOR HIMSELF]
Brook Packerd reports that Bishop Packerd is out of jail, and home safe (TBTG). She herself had a harrowing experience there today (though she was not arrested, she was knee'd by a cop. What is it about the First Amendment that is making the NYPD go nuts? :-( )
That said, I'm also more hopeful for TEC, than Mrs Packerd seems to be. As TEC doesn't have a Pope (Alleluia in Excelsis!), neither does the PB speak for us all. I believe that Episcopalians who support/STAND WITH Occupy best represent TEC (See re Bishop Packard!)
Kindergartners are also taught that if people refuse to share, you don't just take from, a lesson that the OWS folk also seem to have forgotten.
ReplyDeleteBegging the question, Paul, of whether TWS is "people" or a corporation (emphatically NOT people: Suck it, Mitt!)
@David@Montreal: I'm glad Jesus never listened to His lawyer...
ReplyDeleteJCF, I don't know whether Trinity is a corporation or an unincorporated association. Nor do I think it makes a difference here.
ReplyDeleteKindergartners are also taught that if people refuse to share, you don't just take from, a lesson that the OWS folk also seem to have forgotten.
ReplyDeletePaul Powers, I expect that those who climbed the fence knew that they could be arrested. It's called civil disobedience.
JCF, I read last night that Bp. George had been released and was fine.
I still can't believe that Trinity got it so wrong. They are a church, for heaven's sake.
Paul, I wasn't asking a legal question, but a moral one.
ReplyDeleteLate last night, I read something and had a *shock* of recognition.
Not prompted by anything directly OWS-related (rather, the blogroll at Leonardo's---which I think is the best blogroll around, after Friends-of-Jakes!), I read this: How Ayn Rand Seduced Generations of Young Men and Helped Make the U.S. Into a Selfish, Greedy Nation
In it, was this line: "For Rand, all altruists were manipulators."
...and it immediately connected (for me) to this:
Calling this an issue of "political sanctuary" is manipulative and blind to reality.
That's from the "There's No Room at THIS Inn, Kiddos!" letter by TWS Rector James H. Cooper.
Now, just WHO is Cooper's messiah, anyway? The One who had "no room to lay his head", or La Rand???