Saturday, April 28, 2012

MODEL RESOLUTION FOR TEC GENERAL CONVENTION FROM NO ANGLICAN COVENANT COALTION


Below is the model resolution from NACC on the Anglican Covenant for General Convention of the Episcopal Church in the US, which meets in July 2012  The resolution is also available here as a Microsoft Word file and here as a PDF file.  An introduction and explanation may be found at Comprehensive Unity.

Title: Relation to the Anglican Communion

Resolved, the House of _______ concurring, That the 77th General Convention give thanks to all who have worked to increase understanding and strengthen relationships among the churches of the Anglican Communion, and be it further

Resolved, That the General Convention reaffirm the commitment of this church to the fellowship of autonomous national and regional churches that is the Anglican Communion; and be it further

Resolved, That the General Convention believe that sister churches of the Anglican Communion are properly drawn together by bonds of affection, by participation in the common mission of the gospel, and by consultation without coercion or intimidation; and be it further

Resolved, That the General Convention, having prayerfully considered the merits of the Anglican Communion Covenant and believing said agreement to be contrary to Anglican ecclesiology and tradition and to the best interests of the Anglican Communion, respectfully decline to adopt the same; and be it further

Resolved, That the General Convention call upon the leaders of The Episcopal Church at every level to seek opportunities to reach out to strengthen and restore relationships between this church and sister churches of the Communion.
______

4 comments:

  1. Interestingly lop-sided vote by the York crew. No pressure or bullying behind the scenes, you may be sure. Is it, as a poster inquired earlier today at another blog, "a stirring vote of confidence in the archbishop, or a "let's do anything that might grease the skids and get him the Hell out of here to Canterbury", thing?"

    ReplyDelete
  2. Well, the vote surely wasn't a surprise to me. I don't know about the motivation behind the vote - more likely to please the archbishop, I'd say.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I posted this too the wrong thread, didn't I. But it'll do here.

    (Need to delete second try at adjacent thread)

    ReplyDelete
  4. No Lapin, leave it here - for emphasis.

    ReplyDelete

Anonymous commenters, please sign a name, any name, to distinguish one anonymous commenter from another. Thank you.