Before I move out of the way, there is one point I'd like to make. (Are you truly surprised that I could not maintain complete silence on the matter?) Justin says he is sorry about the church's treatment of the gay community:
...it is also absolutely true that the church has often not served the LGBT communities in the way it should. I must express my sadness and sorrow for that considerable failure.Then he proceeds to insist that discriminatory treatment must continue with regard to marriage equality. Does his apology for past actions inoculate the church from charges that it is still not serving the LGBT community as it should at the present time? I don't think so. Does Justin give a thought to the people he serves who will be most affected by the vote? I am not gay, and I can only imagine the pain his words cause LGTB persons.
On to a snippet from Colin, but please read his entire post.
Archbishop Justin’s solution to the intractable problems that introducing same-sex marriage would create is to add a new and valued institution alongside marriage for same gender relationships. Dear Archbishop, have you thought this through – have you asked those of us who are gay and represent many LGB&T Anglicans? How would you create a new and valued institution that is the equivalent of marriage but isn’t marriage.Exactly, Archbishop. Have you asked?
UPDATE: The Bill has now had its second Reading in the House of Lords. The Bill will now get to Committee stage where it will be scrutinised in detail and amendments may be proposed. The proposed amendments will then be discussed in a Third Reading. If the Bill passes that too, the next stage will be Royal Assent (a formality) before it becomes law.
Thanks to my friend Erika on Facebook.