If you'd like to begin the long process to lift the state out of the abyss
in which the Jindal maladministration plunged us, John Bel
Edwards is your candidate.
Early voting continues tomorrow, Monday, November 8, 2015 through Saturday, November 14, 2015. If you are registered to vote in Louisiana, please go to your polling place and vote for John Bel Edwards.
If you approve of the last 8 years of governance by plunder and destruction of Louisiana institutions and programs by Bobby Jindal, then vote for David Vitter for more of the same.
On Sunday, November 1, 2015, All Saints Day, I shall attend the installation of
Presiding Bishop-elect Michael Curry as 27th Presiding Bishop of the Episcopal Church at the
National Cathedral in Washington DC. My friend Lisa,
who was a deputy to General Convention 2015, will not be able to use
her ticket to the installation, so she offered it to several friends,
and I was the first to respond with a yes. I had put my name in the
lottery for a ticket but did not win, so I was thrilled by the offer of
the ticket.
After I booked my flight, I noticed that along with
the ticket, I would be asked to present ID. Well, I am not Lisa, so I
wrote to her and asked if this might present a problem. Dear Lisa,
who knew the right people to contact, along with having to deal with cat/veterinarian and other matters in her own life, arranged to have my name placed on the
master list of ticket holders, so I will not need to pretend to be Lisa. My
flight is non-refundable, so I am quite relieved that all is in order for me to attend the ceremony. Otherwise, I was going to DC anyway to present myself at the
door of the cathedral to see what would happen. If I didn't get in, I planned to enjoy a few tourist days in the nation's capital.
Thanks again to Lisa, for the gift of the ticket and for making the
necessary arrangements for me to attend in my own name.
Below is a
video of Bishop-elect Curry following his election at General Convention
2015 of the Episcopal Church.
FRIDAY UPDATE: I will not be attending the installation of Bishop Curry. I've been
ill with gastrointestinal problems, aches, and fever, since Wednesday
evening. Yesterday, I was not well enough to finish packing, and,
though I feel somewhat better today, there's no way I could be on a
plane. I'm so sorry to miss the ceremony and that the ticket will not
be used, unless someone wants it, and we work out a way for me to get it
to them.
I cancelled my flight reservation, and I will get a
refund, which surprises me. Southwest wanted to give me a free round
trip ticket to travel later, but I said this was to be my last flight,
so the ticket would do me no good. The airline then agreed to refund
the cost, and I'm grateful to them. I cancelled my hotel reservation at
no charge.
Though I'm very disappointed, I've been too ill to
think about what I'll be missing, and I know I made the right decision.
This, too, shall pass, and now I know I need to stick to my plan not to
arrange more travel, except for short car trips.
Louisiana Tech University hosted
a debate among the four major candidates for governor Thursday night —
one of the few televised debates Republican U.S. Sen. David Vitter has
agreed to participate in ahead of the Oct. 24 election.
But
there were no students in the crowd to see it — no crowd at all,
actually. The debate had no live audience, a point that Vitter’s
opponents, Democratic state Rep. John Bel Edwards and Republicans Lt.
Gov. Jay Dardenne and Public Service Commissioner Scott Angelle, each labeled “ridiculous” and “disturbing.” ....
Following the debate, Angelle, Edwards and Dardenne met with reporters, but Vitter did not.
All three speculated that Vitter’s campaign was behind the lack of live audience and media viewing room.
Actually, I would like to move on from the discussion of the
prostitution scandal, which the great majority of the voters in the
state already know about, and address the many other reasons why Vitter
would be a disaster as governor, but he himself continues to emphasize
“family values” in his public appearances. During the debate, Vitter
said he believes in “faith, family, education, and hard work”, thus
reminding people of his “serious sin” against his family.
The
present governor, Bobby Jindal, is possibly the least accessible and
transparent in the history of the state. Will Vitter's fear of
questions and comments about his past lead him to isolate himself from
the media and the citizens of Louisiana in the same way as Jindal?
Louisiana does not need another governor in hiding.
After reconsidering his first impression
following a storm of disagreement from his readers, John Cassidy at The New Yorker still thinks Hillary Clinton won the Democratic debate. Clinton had the most to lose
going into the debate, because her numbers were down due to the
persistent media focus on the private email server "scandal". Her
performance in the debate was stellar, and she came across as much more
likable than in previous media appearances.
Bernie Sanders was Bernie Sanders,
the same person we know (and love?) from his frequent speeches and
media appearances, and few, if any of us, expected him to be other than
the man we already know. He was himself, and he performed excellently
in the debate.
My less than expert opinion is that neither of the two principal candidates won or
lost, and both did very well. Sanders gave Clinton an enormous boost
when he said:
The American people are sick and tired of hearing about
your damn emails!
Martin O'Malley had several good moments in
the debate, and his final statement was superb. In a few words, he
summed up the difference between the candidates in the GOP and the
Democratic candidates. I like having him on the stage as a foil for
both Sanders and Clinton.
I'm not sure why Jim Webb and Lincoln Chaffee were on the stage, but neither gained from their inclusion in the debate.
The complete title of the movie is Birdman; The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance. Right there you have a smile - at least I did. I watched the movie twice and laughed out loud during a number of scenes both times, more so in the second viewing, but the humor is dark, indeed. My responses ran the gamut, from, "What's going on?" (my initial reaction), to laughter, to suspense, to sadness, and back more than once to all of the above, till the final, "What's going on?"
Michael Keaton is brilliant as Riggan Thomson, aka Birdman, an aging film superhero, who, of course, can fly, and who is trying to change the direction of his career by bringing to the stage a short story by Raymond Carver in which he also plays a starring role. Emma Stone is terrific in the role of Riggan's daughter, Sam, who is just out of rehab. Stone is a commanding presence each time she appears on the screen. The scenes with Sam and Michael Shiner (Edward Norton), an actor who is brought into the play in a leading role at the eleventh hour, are especially funny, tender, and poignant. Jake (Zach Galifianakis), Riggan's long-suffering good friend and lawyer, is very fine in his supporting role.
As for the play within a movie, from the scenes that appear the film, the drama is not the least believable, nor is it recognizable as based on a Carver story, but, nevertheless, it serves to advance the dark, chaotic hilarity of the story.
Since I watched the film twice, you've probably guessed that I think it worth viewing, and I very much do. Though I highly recommend the movie, because of the blackness of its satire, Birdman is probably not for everyone.
Senator David Vitter, candidate for governor of Louisiana, refuses to debate the other candidates in the race. He refuses to answer questions from the survey by United Way. Why is he afraid? We know who Vitter is against from the vicious TV ads his supporters run against his fellow Republicans in the campaign, but why does he refuse to accept the challenge to stand up with the other candidates and debate policies? Why no response to the United Way survey? If John Bel Edwards (D) and Vitter are in the runoff after the primary, Vitter supporters will run vicious ads against Edwards. We know who Vitter's against, but what does he stand for? Vitter is in the fray, not above it, and his refusal to engage and answer questions smacks of arrogance and a lack of transparency. Haven't we had enough here in Louisiana?
Your own responsibility as members of Congress is to enable this country, by your legislative activity, to grow as a nation. You are the face of its people, their representatives. You are called to defend and preserve the dignity of your fellow citizens in the tireless and demanding pursuit of the common good, for this is the chief aim of all politics. A political society endures when it seeks, as a vocation, to satisfy common needs by stimulating the growth of all its members, especially those in situations of greater vulnerability or risk. Legislative activity is always based on care for the people. To this you have been invited, called and convened by those who elected you.
Was John Boehner's conscience pricked by Pope Francis' words "common good" and "common needs"? Also, his role as leader of an unruly House was exposed for what it is: nearly, but not quite, useless. I think it's possible that the pope's visit inspired Boehner to announce his retirement at this moment, rather than at some time in not-so-distant future. Also, he may have had enough of trying to reign in far right extremists who care nothing about doing their jobs of actually governing the country. Besides, he'll no doubt move on to a better paying lobbying job that is far less stressful.
Whoever replaces Boehner as speaker will have to deal with the same Democratic president and the same filibuster rule in the Senate in attempts to pass legislation. Though I am no admirer of Boehner, to his credit, he kept the barbarians behind the gate to avert several disasters. Since Boehner's position as speaker is no longer at risk, the likelihood of a government shutdown may be lessened.
One reason I enjoyed the miniseries Arthur and George more than dramas based on Arthur Conan Doyle's character, Sherlock Holmes, is because I have no strong, preconceived image of Sir Arthur (Martin Clunes), as I do about Holmes. The series, based on a 2005 novel by Julian Barnes with the same title, recounts, with sometimes more and sometimes less accuracy, the true story of a case Doyle took on to prove the innocence of George Edjali. Edalji, an Anglo-Indian solicitor, had been tried and, as the mystery writer believed, unjustly convicted of a series of crimes, because of racism.
The script, which takes artistic liberty with both the book and Edalji's true story, is well written and well performed by the actors. As is usually the case, the narrative in the series takes great liberties with both Barnes' book and the true story of Edalji and seems to have been filmed entirely in semi-darkess or in darkness.
The plot includes a number of twists and turns, and I had to watch one of the episodes over again, because I got lost in the weeds and confused about which characters did what. Since I hardly ever do in mystery stories, I was a bit puffed up because I suspected the identity of one of the villains fairly early in the series. There was something about the character - perhaps he seemed too innocent.
Throughout the series, I wondered if Alfred Wood, or Woodie (Charles Edwards), was Doyle's servant or his friend. After reading reviews, I learned that Woodie was his friend/secretary, i. e., his Watson, and quite an obliging friend he is. The chemistry between the actors, Clunes and Edwards, contributes greatly to the overall quality of the series.
Gov. Bobby Jindal’s administration is quietly notifying legislative leaders that Louisiana closed the books on the last budget year with a
deficit, but the administration isn’t saying publicly how deep the
problem is. The announcement of the deficit’s size is expected in mid-October,
when details are due to the Legislature’s joint budget committee. State Treasurer John Kennedy estimates the gap exceeds $100 million. .... Although Kennedy is the state treasurer, the Republican said he can’t
get a firm number from the administration. He said his office has done
its own calculations to determine the shortfall is “well over” $100
million.
Jindal claims to have balanced the budget every year he's been in office, but I can't remember a year when the Jindal maladministration has not announced mid-year cuts, except his first year in office when former governor Kathleen Blanco left a surplus of at least $800 million. This year's so-called balanced budget is a patched together, smoke-and-mirrors farce enabled by complicit members of the Louisiana Legislature that fooled no one. The governor, along with a majority of the legislators, pledge allegiance to Grover Norquist, rather than adhere to their oaths of office to perform their duties to "support the constitution and laws of the United States and the constitution and laws of this state" and produce a balanced budget.
What is going on when the state treasurer has difficulty getting the numbers from the Jindal maladministration? And where is the governor? Out of state campaigning in his futile attempt to seize the nomination as candidate for president of the GOP.
By propping my elbows on Tom's boat to shoot the moon a few nights ago, I finally was successful in capturing a photo of a crescent moon that actually looks like a crescent and not like a blob of light. Yesterday, I tried to upload the photo without success, until I cracked the Google code. A haiku from the past to celebrate my success:
Thin-sliced moon rises
Moving slenderly upward
Higher and higher
