Monday, June 1, 2009

Whose Fault, Dick?

From Frank Rich at the New York Times:

Once again Cheney and his cohort were using lies and fear to try to gain political advantage — this time to rewrite history and escape accountability for the failed Bush presidency rather than to drum up a new war. Once again Democrats in Congress were cowed. And once again too much of the so-called liberal news media parroted the right’s scare tactics, putting America’s real security interests at risk by failing to challenge any Washington politician carrying a big stick.

"Dick Cheney and his cohort" are just doing what they do, taking the slimy low road to deceive, manipulate, and now weasel out of their responsibility for the giant, smelly pile that they left behind. But WTF is wrong with the Democrats in Congress and the news media?

The Democrats are in charge, now but they're still scared silly by the Republicans, even after their massive repudiation by the citizens of the country. The Senate hands Obama a 90-6 "NO!" vote to shutting down that hall of horrors and shame called Guantanamo. What will it take to stiffen the spines of the Congress critters? What will it take?

And the so-called liberal media, the media who view themselves as unbiased, not Fox News, not Rush Limbaugh and his ilk, but those whom we expect to inform us of the true state of things, what are they doing? Only a very few call Cheney and his pals on their lies - and none in face to face confrontation with the Dick himself. Ooooh! If they laid out Cheney's deceptions before him, he might not appear again on their shows. And what a profound loss THAT would be to us all! I ask the media, "Why do you give Cheney a forum to repeat his lies over and over, even after the lies have been repudiated and exposed for what they are? What's wrong with you?"

The reporters and columnists who do their jobs look like heroes today. A big "THANK YOU" to Frank Rich for this column and for his many other truth-telling columns and to Jonathan Landay and Warren Strobel at McKlatchy who lay out the "omissions, exaggerations and misstatements" in Cheney's speech at the American Enterprise Institute and who also were amongst those who called attention to the "omissions, exaggerations and misstatements" of the Bush maladministration before the Iraq War.

Shame on you, Democrats in Congress. Shame on you hotshots and pundits in the media. You're not doing your jobs. I'm compiling an "Enemies in the So-called Liberal Media" list, and David Gregory's name is on it.

Paul, the BB, highlights the money quote, and I thank him for calling my attention to Rich's column.

The harrowing truth remains unchanged from what it was before Cheney emerged from his bunker to set Washington atwitter. The Bush administration did not make us safer either before or after 9/11. Obama is not making us less safe. If there’s another terrorist attack, it will be because the mess the Bush administration ignored in Pakistan and Afghanistan spun beyond anyone’s control well before Americans could throw the bums out.

UPDATE: Heroes of the Senate who voted against the amendment to prevent appropriation funds to be used to close Guantanamo:

Dick Durbin (D-Ill.)
Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.)
Tom Harkin (D-Iowa)
Carl Levin (D-Mich.)
Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.)
Jack Reed (D-R.I.)

Thank you, Senators. I am proud of you.

10 comments:

  1. Preach Mimi, PREACH! I had missed Frank Rich's latest. Thanks for posting this. My sentiments exactly, but stated more succinctly than I ever could. Amen. ~ ~ and Alleluia!

    ReplyDelete
  2. And you know what, Crapaud? That giant smelly pile is a pile of shit. I left the word out of the post, but I'll say it here.

    Et merci, mon cher.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I read it this morning and thought that Frank Rich really nailed it. I could not understand the vote on Guantanamo and his explanation makes sense. What a bunch of wooses. And Cheney and his cohort are the ones responsible for making this country unsafe.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I was simmering all during my walk tonight. It was ruined. I should not let myself get into such a state.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Mimi, I hope your night's sleep wasn't too disturbed. I commented this morning on Bob Herbert's piece in the NY Times which also takes on the right.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Amelia, my sleep WAS disturbed. I know. That's ridiculous. It's not so much Cheney, as it is the Democrats and the press who don't stand up to Cheney and his ilk. Cheney lies so much that I wonder if he even knows the difference between a lie and the truth.

    Sen. Carl Levin stood up to him the other day, and said that the memos that Cheney is clamoring to have made public, which he has seen, DO NOT show that torture prevented terrorist attacks.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I cannot imagine that any memos they want dredged up will support Cheney's case.

    ReplyDelete
  8. The harrowing truth remains that for two months prior to 9/11 the Bush administration shrugged off CIA warnings that intelligence strongly indicated that al-Qaeda was about to strike the US. To my mind, this, not the invasion of Iraq, is the great WTF moment of the Bush presidency - the elephant in the room that politicians of both parties and most of the press persist in ignoring.

    ReplyDelete
  9. And what about the vacant look on Condi's face as she held the PDB, dated August 6, 2001, with the title, "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in US", when she testified before the 9/11 Commission?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Catherine in JapanJune 3, 2009 at 2:10 AM

    RI, yes!

    ReplyDelete

Anonymous commenters, please sign a name, any name, to distinguish one anonymous commenter from another. Thank you.