Tuesday, October 23, 2012

COMPARE AND CONTRAST

 
The pollsters tell me, as of today, the election is a dead heat, but I'm having real trouble wrapping my head around that piece of information.  The election on November 6 should be a landslide in favor of Obama...a landslide, not because Obama did everything right in the last four years, for I have issues with certain of his policies, but the president did much to better the lives of the citizens of the US. Below is a list of the top-10 accomplishments of the Obama administration from The Washington MonthlySee details and the rest of the list here.

1. Passed Health Care Reform
 
3. Passed Wall Street Reform

4. Ended the War in Iraq

5. Began Drawdown of War in Afghanistan

6. Eliminated Osama bin laden

7. Turned Around U.S. Auto Industry

8. Recapitalized Banks

9. Repealed “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell

10. Toppled Moammar Gaddafi

I favor certain of Obama's accomplishments over others, but I measure them against what Romney offers the electorate. What are Romney's accomplishments?

1. Signed Romneycare into law as governor of Massachusetts.

2. CEO of Bain & Company, co-founded Bain Capital 

3. CEO of the 2002 Winter Olympics.

Romney backed away from Romneycare, then reclaimed the program, then backed away again.  Perhaps there was further waffling that I missed.

Romney accumulated vast wealth during his association with Bain.
The incredible untold story of the 2012 election so far is that Romney's run has been a shimmering pearl of perfect political hypocrisy, which he's somehow managed to keep hidden, even with thousands of cameras following his every move.And the drama of this rhetorical high-wire act was ratcheted up even further when Romney chose his running mate, Rep. Paul Ryan of Wisconsin – like himself, a self-righteously anal, thin-lipped, Whitest Kids U Know penny pincher who'd be honored to tell Oliver Twist there's no more soup left. By selecting Ryan, Romney, the hard-charging, chameleonic champion of a disgraced-yet-defiant Wall Street, officially succeeded in moving the battle lines in the 2012 presidential race.
....

Last May, in a much-touted speech in Iowa, Romney used language that was literally inflammatory to describe America's federal borrowing. "A prairie fire of debt is sweeping across Iowa and our nation," he declared. "Every day we fail to act, that fire gets closer to the homes and children we love." Our collective debt is no ordinary problem: According to Mitt, it's going to burn our children alive.

And this is where we get to the hypocrisy at the heart of Mitt Romney. Everyone knows that he is fantastically rich, having scored great success, the legend goes, as a "turnaround specialist," a shrewd financial operator who revived moribund companies as a high-priced consultant for a storied Wall Street private equity firm. But what most voters don't know is the way Mitt Romney actually made his fortune: by borrowing vast sums of money that other people were forced to pay back. This is the plain, stark reality that has somehow eluded America's top political journalists for two consecutive presidential campaigns: Mitt Romney is one of the greatest and most irresponsible debt creators of all time. In the past few decades, in fact, Romney has piled more debt onto more unsuspecting companies, written more gigantic checks that other people have to cover, than perhaps all but a handful of people on planet Earth.
....

The only ones who profited in a big way from all the job-killing debt that Romney leveraged were Mitt and his buddies at Bain, along with Wall Street firms like Goldman and Citigroup. Barry Ritholtz, author of Bailout Nation, says the criticisms of Bain about layoffs and meanness miss a more important point, which is that the firm's profit-producing record is absurdly mediocre, especially when set against all the trouble and pain its business model causes. "Bain's fundamental flaw, at least according to the math," Ritholtz writes, "is that they took lots of risk, use immense leverage and charged enormous fees, for performance that was more or less the same as [stock] indexing."
So.  After all the skullduggery, destruction of businesses, and death of jobs, to the great financial benefit of CEOs and top management, Bain produced only a mediocre return for its investors.  Every voter should read the Rolling Stone piece.  It's long but very revealing of the real Mitt Romney, who would trash and pillage the country in a worse way than I ever imagined.  If you thought Gordon Gekko was bad....

17 comments:

  1. Anyone who supports Mitt Romney because of a position he claims to have or actions he says he will take must bear in mind that this same guy has said he takes the opposite position and will take the opposite action.

    So how do you know he is on your side on any issue rather than against you?

    If you are afraid for the future of your country, can you depend for solutions on someone who says he will do the opposite of what you want -- whatever it is that you want?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Exactly (Paul A.). What the election comes down to is that Romney cannot be trusted. His vision of the common good of the country is prospering corporations, and a parsimonious version of trickle down economics. Is Romney truly as amoral as he appears?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That says it all. Romney can NOT be trusted. The biggest and most important value of all, TRUST, when embracing a person or personal situation in our lives. I don't even want to be in the same country with Romney...he, in fact, doesn't, at least to me, have a leadership opportunity outside being President of Iran or North Korean...of course the Chinese job would overwhelm him because he's not smart enough to handle it...that leaves Brother Kim-Jon-Mitt (and all those boy sons to help out) to guide North Korea or Iran or, let's just send the whole lot to Afghanistan to reorganize at the top like the Winter Olympics!

      Delete
    2. Len, one thought consoles me: If Romney loses, we won't see him again as a candidate. On the other hand, if he wins...well, I don't even care to think about that.

      Give me a far right candidate who will stand up for what she/he believes and speak something approaching the truth to Romney who changes his colors in the blink of an eye to suit the targeted audience. He's an extremist who wishes to sneak by without close scrutiny and have his way with us.

      Delete
  3. Vote for your boss. Vote for Mittens.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, the slimy, sleazy bosses who threaten lay-offs or shut-downs if their employees don't vote for Mittens. Thank heavens for the secret ballot. I think we still have that.

      Delete
  4. He has skated on releasing his tax records. He is not held to account for most of the things he says and does. Obama is leading in electoral votes though, and will probably win the popular vote, if by a narrow margin. I voted early on Monday and the place was packed. I think this a good sign.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I voted already from Guatemala. The Democrats Abroad are packing them in for Obama (only a few Republican voters amongst all the expats). Even amongst the wealthier folks who have second (or third) homes here there is a clear consensus for OBAMA! My ballot, and many others too, are winging there way to Florida already! It's done!

      Delete
    2. Bex, I don't understand why the media don't hammer away at Mitt's refusal to release his tax returns. What is he hiding?

      Delete
    3. Len, your news about the expats warms my heart. I wonder if the Florida vote count will be in the headlines again.

      Delete
    4. The media got bored with the tax story. They'd have had to actually do some work to look into it.

      Delete
  5. The sad truth is that people want to believe the fantasy that the former governor can make it all better just because he says he can, in the absence either of evidence he has done so in the past, or details as to how he will do it in the future. This is held up against the actual performance of the incumbent, which while not perfect, shows definite progress in the right direction.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Because of the record of the incumbent, Romney threw in the towel and agreed with Obama's policies, rather than enlighten the electorate about his own foreign policy plans. Just because he would not state his policies, doesn't mean he doesn't have policies. We'd have John Bolton and John Yoo as influential voices in a Romney administration. Mercy!

      Delete
    2. Tobias, I'm glad you put this on facebook. Infinitely shareable and I did.

      Delete
  6. I was surprised(but not much) that Rmoney seemed to agree with everything President Obama has said all along about our foreign policy. Amazing!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Susan, Romney may have showed his phony "moderate" side so the electorate wouldn't be frightened into thinking he might drag us into another war. That does not mean he won't drag us into another war if he is elected.

      Delete
  7. I, too, am surprised that the election is as close as polls would suggest. I'm a big believer in listening to all sides and looking for thoughtful, fair, practical, and compassionate middle ground. The New Republicans are such an intractable lot with no room for compromise, and I just don't understand how the GOP ticket and platform appeals to anyone other than those on the far right. The Dems maintain a particular ideology as well, but the Obama administration certainly has demonstrated more willingness to negotiate. I can understand frustration with the slow economic recovery and with the seemingly endless mess in the Middle East, but to abandon a forward (albeit slow) moving ship just defies logic. NYT links are a little shaky (depending on how often you hit the site without a subscription) but I'll try to share a well-reasoned Tom Friedman piece that speaks to our loss of middle ground. If the link fails, you can probably get to it by googling Friedman's name and the column title, Our Secret Sauce. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/24/opinion/friedman-our-secret-sauce.html

    ReplyDelete

Anonymous commenters, please sign a name, any name, to distinguish one anonymous commenter from another. Thank you.