Wednesday, May 2, 2007

The Windsor Bishops' Letter

From The Living Church Foundation, via Galleycat, via Jim Naughton (enough "vias"?) comes word of a letter from a group of Windsor bishops to the Archbishop of Canterbury. The signatories do not include my bishop, Charles Jenkins, who has, in the past, described himself a Windsor bishop.

The letter states:

“We want to reassure you that we are committed to the Camp Allen principles and realize that for us, they are the way by which we intend to remain united as we move forward in these challenging days,” the bishops stated in an April 26 letter.

“We also realize that the covenant process is critical to these discussions, and indeed is the focal point of the work now underway to define our life together. For us, neither of these commitments has wavered in light of the recent decisions by the House of Bishops.”


From "The Living Church Foundation":

The letter was signed by the following bishops:
• John W. Howe, Central Florida
• James M. Stanton, Dallas
• Jeffrey N. Steenson, Rio Grande
• Edward L. Salmon, Jr., retired, South Carolina
• Don A. Wimberly, Texas
• Gary W. Lillibridge, West Texas
• D. Bruce MacPherson, Western Louisiana


Jim Naughton says this:

The seven style themselves a “steering committee,” making one wonder how many passengers are on this particular bus. At one point, the group that endorsed the Camp Allen principles, numbered in the mid-20s, depending on when you were doing the counting. But their ranks have been reduced by retirements and defections occasioned by the harsh recommendations made to the Episcopal Church by the Primates of the Anglican Communion at their February meeting in Dar es Salaam.

And that was before the group’s leaders and its high profile consultants began shooting themselves in as many feet as they had amongst them.


Jim talks about the connection between the Reverend Radner of the Anglican Communion Institute and of the Institute for Religion and Democracy, and the Reverend Armstrong, also a member of the ACI, who "had been suspended from his duties as rector of Grace Church and Saint Stephen’s in Colorado Springs by the bishop of Colorado, the Rt. Rev. Rob O’Neill." Go read Jim to understand the tangled web. It's difficult to follow the connections and twists and turns.

The result:

So it came to pass that a five-man organization [ACI] that presumed to tell the 77-million member Anglican Communion how to resolve its internal difficulties had to disassociate itself from its own Web site. The ACI now has a new Web site, but credibility, unlike domain names, can’t be bought.

Again, where is my bishop in all of this? I don't know. There's nothing new on the website of the Diocese of Louisiana on the subject since Bishop Jenkins' statement on the House of Bishops meeting issued on April 4, 2007. This member of the flock is still in darkness.

I do believe that the unity of Windsor bishops is unraveling.

8 comments:

  1. And, I'm sure he hasn't answered your letter either.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Share Cropper, he has not answered my letter, nor my email, nor has he posted my comment on the diocesan website. There you are.

    ReplyDelete
  3. My Bishop (+ Jeffrey Steenson) unfortunately is a signatory. Very soon i hope to post my thoughts about the 'listening forum' that our parish held last week with +Jeffrey. It was quite an evening, though i don't know if he actually heard any of the folks who spoke. The forum was recorded, so as soon as the audio file's available on my parish website, i'll be blogging about the evening.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Scott, at least you had a listening forum. Neither Bishop Jenkins nor my rector seem sold on the "listening process" part of the Windsor document.

    I'll be interested to read your post on the forum.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Who is driving the bus? Even if they are on a short bus, they have to agree who is ging to drive and know where they are trying to go.

    BJ

    ReplyDelete
  6. BJ, good point. Who is driving the bus, and where are they going? All those hands on the wheel is problematic, too.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Any bus +Wimberly is driving will be running of fumes of pure hubris, and will stall-out on the road to nowhere(Shreveport?).

    ReplyDelete
  8. John D, Shreveport nowhere? Yeah, that's about right.

    ReplyDelete

Anonymous commenters, please sign a name, any name, to distinguish one anonymous commenter from another. Thank you.