Monday, June 18, 2007

Haunted Vets

From the Washington Post:

Army Spec. Jeans Cruz helped capture Saddam Hussein. When he came home to the Bronx, important people called him a war hero and promised to help him start a new life. The mayor of New York, officials of his parents' home town in Puerto Rico, the borough president and other local dignitaries honored him with plaques and silk parade sashes. They handed him their business cards and urged him to phone.

But a "black shadow" had followed Cruz home from Iraq, he confided to an Army counselor. He was hounded by recurring images of how war really was for him: not the triumphant scene of Hussein in handcuffs, but visions of dead Iraqi children.

In public, the former Army scout stood tall for the cameras and marched in the parades. In private, he slashed his forearms to provoke the pain and adrenaline of combat. He heard voices and smelled stale blood. Soon the offers of help evaporated and he found himself estranged and alone, struggling with financial collapse and a darkening depression.

....

At a low point, he went to the local Department of Veterans Affairs medical center for help. One VA psychologist diagnosed Cruz with post-traumatic stress disorder. His condition was labeled "severe and chronic." In a letter supporting his request for PTSD-related disability pay, the psychologist wrote that Cruz was "in need of major help" and that he had provided "more than enough evidence" to back up his PTSD claim. His combat experiences, the letter said, "have been well documented."


The evaluators turned down Cruz' request for disability pay, because they said that his condition pre-existed before he joined the Army and because he had not proved that he was in combat. So now the troops must prove that they were in combat? Does no one in the Army keep records?

Once celebrated by his government, Cruz feels defeated by its bureaucracy. He no longer has the stamina to appeal the VA decision, or to make the Army correct the sloppy errors in his medical records or amend his personnel file so it actually lists his combat awards.

"I'm pushing the mental limits as it is," Cruz said, standing outside the bullet-pocked steel door of the New York City housing project on Webster Avenue where he grew up and still lives with his family. "My experience so far is, you ask for something and they deny, deny, deny. After a while you just give up."


We send the troops to Iraq and Afghanistan, put them in danger of death and maiming, and then, if they get home in one piece, but require emotional or psychological help, we deny them the treatment they need.

Along with the recent exposés of conditions in military facilities, such as Walter Reed, comes the story of the lack of care for those wounded emotionally and psychologically. The story is not really new. It's been floating around for a while, but the WP pulls it together well.

Perhaps, the WP redeems itself a little for front-paging many stories beating the war drums in the run-up to the Iraq War and burying in the inside pages, Walter Pincus' stories about those who offered dissenting views to the rush to topple Saddam. The dissenting stories were there; I was reading them, but, apparently not enough others were paying attention to slow the madness.

"The paper was not front-paging stuff," said Pentagon correspondent Thomas Ricks. "Administration assertions were on the front page. Things that challenged the administration were on A18 on Sunday or A24 on Monday. There was an attitude among editors: Look, we're going to war, why do we even worry about all this contrary stuff?"

See how that goes? Good for them that we have this story of the denial of mental health care to veterans laid out on the front page. I don't know about you, but a story like this is nearly unbearable for me. The word comes from on high, "Deny, deny, deny."

Veterans Affairs will spend $2.8 billion this year on mental health. However, we spend $200 million per day on prosecuting the war in Iraq.

They occupy every rank, uniform and corner of the country. People such as Army Lt. Sylvia Blackwood, who was admitted to a locked-down psychiatric ward in Washington after trying to hide her distress for a year and a half [story, A13]; and Army Pfc. Joshua Calloway, who spent eight months at Walter Reed Army Medical Center and left barely changed from when he arrived from Iraq in handcuffs; and retired Marine Lance Cpl. Jim Roberts, who struggles to keep his sanity in suburban New York with the help of once-a-week therapy and a medicine cabinet full of prescription drugs; and the scores of Marines in California who were denied treatment for PTSD because the head psychiatrist on their base thought the diagnosis was overused.

We have a shameful history in our treatment of Vietnam veterans, and we should know better the consequences of denying help that is urgently needed.

Jeans Cruz and his contemporaries in the military were never supposed to suffer in the shadows the way veterans of the last long, controversial war did. One of the bitter legacies of Vietnam was the inadequate treatment of troops when they came back. Tens of thousands endured psychological disorders in silence, and too many ended up homeless, alcoholic, drug-addicted, imprisoned or dead before the government acknowledged their conditions and in 1980 officially recognized PTSD as a medical diagnosis.

So why do I bother taking note of this story? The WP has many more readers than the small band who gather here, folks who very likely agree with me already. Maybe I do it for me, because I find the story so hard to take in, so hard to bear, that writing about it helps a little.

15 comments:

  1. Mimi, thank you for this. We need to be mindful of these soldiers returning from this highly ambiguous and murky war.

    We will be recovering from this war long after it has (hopefully) ended. Though I empathize with those who have lost loved ones, at least death is clean in that the suffering of life is over and grief can ease with time. I mourn for those whose wounds may only fester with time, especially with the effectively non-treatment they are receiving. And their families who suffer with them.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think you do it, Mimi, because we have to tell the truth. In one sense it doesn't matter who is reading it, or who isn't - we tell the truth our hearts know, before God. What else can we do?

    Thank you that whatever your misgivings, you did just that! It gives courage to the rest of us, when we are plagued with those kinds of doubt, and are tempted to be less resolute...

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks for keeping this front and center - we have these vets all over Wyoming as rural and tribal kids are the ones being sent along with those from the inner city, with ads of glory on TV all the time. Shame and more shame.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I am surprised this is news to anyone, but that's partly my responsibility for not speaking out more clearly. OTOH, I've had my hands full.

    I've been at least 50% PTSD "service-connected disabled" since 1998; I'd been treated since 1985, but I had taken it upon myself to defeat it.

    At the beginning of 2003, my therapist rubbed my nose in the facts, along with some comrades in my groups, and I applied for an upgrade because of career/ employment issues. The appeal lasted eighteen months, although I had been in the system for more than fifteen years; I was denied once (Typical: you get three tries; most of us suspect strongly the first is to give incompetent bureaucrats something to do). After it was granted Aug. 1. 2004, I found out by bugging them to see if the decision had been made yet, on September 20th. I wasn't sure how October's rent could be met.

    My needs are now met, so long as the government holds up its end of the agreement, which they have threatened to abandon several times since then, which is not good for my BP. I still resent the VA, though I have good relations with individuals (Just got back from an appointment, actually).

    The worst aspect of the last five years has been watching the same egregious blowhards destroy so many young people as they did us forty years ago, and, as the survivors trickle in, kick them in the teeth for a tax cut.

    Excuse me; can't finish.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Cynthia, Mike, and Ann, thank you.

    Mike, you have a very nice blog. I see that you admire Merton, as I do.

    Johnieb, I was hoping you would weigh in as the voice of experience, but I didn't want to call you out. Thank you for your words. May God bless you and heal you.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Yes, Mimi,

    thanks for the safe place. It's good for me to tell as much as I can, but sometimes equally necessary to rest from the labor.

    You know I visit here a lot, regardless of the subject.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Maybe I do it for me, because I find the story so hard to take in, so hard to bear, that writing about it helps a little.

    Precisely, Sister Mimi; some days I think this administration has traumatized the better part of the country. We found it helped to talk to each other (who else would listen?); I recommend telling it: PRN.

    Welcome home, y'all.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Mimi, these posts of yours are important. They have a different function from Washington Post articles which will (we hope) be seen by larger numbers of people. Sometimes large numbers are not the secret to bringing about change. I like Mikef's view that this is 'telling the truth before God'. It not only allows you to speak from your own heart and conscience, but also gives others a place to gather, and we know that wherever two or three assemble in His name, Christ is present. Together we witness, pray, offer each other comfort, and strengthen ourselves to fight for those who are suffering and in danger. I continue to give thanks for your ministry.

    Special prayers and love to Johnieb.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Johnieb, Mary Clara, thank you. The thought that we are a small band of the prayerful gathered, with Christ in our midst, is quite consoling, quite uplifting. In fact, it made me cry - in a good way.

    ReplyDelete
  10. This is, indeed, a tragedy that needs to be told as many times as it takes for it be to heard and acted upon.

    Unfortunately, however, this is not just a veterans issue, although it seems especially unjust in light of the sacrifices the veterans make on behalf of us all. Both the government and private insurers take the easy way of trying to keep costs down by awarding benefits to only the most persistent, well-represented, influential, and (to the extent it is required or helpful for effective representation) wealthy and/or well-educated applicants. People who have mental or emotional conditions and even brain damage are often ignored and devalued. Neither the medical community nor the public and private organizations that fund benefits have any good idea of how to care for such people.

    My first husband was not a veteran, but after years of unemployment following brain surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy, serious memory problems, and finally erratic behavior (including entering contests and taking out more and more credit cards, to turn around and be taken on more scams), demonstrable failure of short-term memory and executive brain functions, finally died at home of heart failure, perhaps compounded by extreme summer heat and dehydration (after having previously collapsed and gone to the hospital and been released and several weeks later finally found by the police driving on the wrong side of the road, hundreds of miles from home, with no drugs or alcohol in his system). His application for SSD disability benefits for the last 8 weeks of his life was denied the first round. The government said that despite his seizures and memory problems, there was no reason why he could not perform his old job as a car salesman. Fortunately, our children have no desperate need for those benefits. But their father certainly could have used the medical attention he could have had if he could have been earlier given disability benefits with its attendant medical care -- which, of course, he was too damaged to apply successfully for, despite the best efforts of his family and friends. If he had any kind of decent medical care the last couple years of his life, perhaps his seizures could have been suppressed, his diet and intake of fluids improved, and perhaps he would still be alive today.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Klady, what a sad story. It's not just the vets, it's our whole health care debacle in this country, with mental health care being one of the most striking examples of our failures.

    ReplyDelete
  12. O for heaven's sake, Grandmere - I had overlooked that you have your own blog in all my own agonizing over myself.

    I"m so glad I found this!

    ReplyDelete
  13. GM, I used to read the WP daily when I lived there, but rarely have seen it in the past year since I moved. I'm glad you brought this story to our attention. I'm glad you keep telling the truth and calling us to prayer. Blessings.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I've often thought that no sane person could go to war and come back "allright." We may work ourselves up to a state in which we can kill, but surely that's a temporary psychosis? Innocents and bystanders aside, can one even claim to have seen an enemy dead by one's own hand and not be somehow harmed by it?

    ReplyDelete

Anonymous commenters, please sign a name, any name, to distinguish one anonymous commenter from another. Thank you.