Monday, July 16, 2007

How The Mighty Fall

David Vitter was a Rhodes Scholar. He should have known better. He could have taken a lesson from his own State of Louisiana's recent history from Rep. Bob Livingston, or he could have gone back further to the late 19th century.

From Roger in the comments, here's a link to an article at Huffington Post by Karen Dalton-Beninato, on past shenanigans by one Louisiana politician which led to his untimely death at the hands of a prostitute:

It was 1870, and State Sen. Beares was shot by famed New Orleans Madam Hattie Hamilton. His obituary in the Ouachita Telegraph read:

"State Senator Beares, of Catahoula, died recently in the same city from the effects of a pistol wound received under rather mysterious circumstances. His mistress, Hattie Hamilton, was arrested for complicity in the act, but was released. Catahoula and Winn parishes are without a Senator."


Hattie had a colorful history before she became involved with Senator Beares. She must have been quite a woman because Sen. Beares "fell hard" for her in spite of the fact that Hattie had "a glass eye and other infirmities."

It's a puzzle to me why folks strive to gain high positions and then proceed to risk everything by engaging in activities that can bring them down. I suppose that once they're in positions of power, they begin to see themselves as invulnerable. Those who judge and excoriate others seem to be most prone to this type of behavior.

According to my friend Oyster, conservative Louisiana bloggers are now calling for Vitter's resignation.

Near the end of the HP piece is this quote from Bertrand Russell's "The Conquest of Happiness":

"People who wish to have a high opinion of their own moral excellence have therefore to persuade themselves that they have achieved a degree of unselfishness that it is very unlikely they have achieved, and hence the endeavor after saintliness comes to be connected with self-deception of a kind that easily leads on to persecution mania."

6 comments:

  1. "People who wish to have a high opinion of their own moral excellence have therefore to persuade themselves that they have achieved a degree of unselfishness that it is very unlikely they have achieved, and hence the endeavor after saintliness comes to be connected with self-deception of a kind that easily leads on to persecution mania."

    Seems to me it'd be easier to just not be a jerk...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Kate, welcome. I think you may be on to something. Your idea is simpler and straightforward.

    ReplyDelete
  3. "It's a puzzle to me why folks strive to gain high positions and then proceed to risk everything by engaging in activities that can bring them down. I suppose that once they're in positions of power, they begin to see themselves as invulnerable. Those who judge and excoriate others seem to be most prone to this type of behavior."

    I don't see much puzzle here. Those in power have the same sexual desires as anyone else, plus the power to indulge them.

    Nor have I observed that that situation is particularly confined to the straight-laced. I can think of any number of non-judgmental, liberal politicians who have been caught up in sex scandals. Desire and abuse don't discriminate by political philosophy or one's degree of tolerance, so far as I can tell.

    Of course it's a juicier story when Senator Upright of the Decent Citizen's Brigade gets Nabbed in Love Nest with Curvaceous Co-ed. But the desire is there across the board, and I think our Buddhist friends are basically right about its insatiability.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Of course it's a juicier story when Senator Upright of the Decent Citizen's Brigade gets Nabbed in Love Nest with Curvaceous Co-ed.

    That's it exactly.

    I know its human nature, but it's still a puzzle to me that people are so confident they won't get caught. It seems downright stupid if you're a public person, living in a goldfish bowl.

    I guess some folks are more insatiable than others.

    ReplyDelete
  5. It reminds me of my one boyfriend Ray -- he knows it's wrong to lie, and so he doesn't; but his more compelling reason not to lie is just that there's less to keep track of.

    I could go on, y'know? But, well.

    Thanks for the welcome!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Kate, I agree. Telling the truth is easier, much easier than having to keep track of lies.

    ReplyDelete

Anonymous commenters, please sign a name, any name, to distinguish one anonymous commenter from another. Thank you.