Thursday, April 10, 2008

"Afghan Trials Unfair"

From the AP via New York Times:

Human Rights First lauded the Afghan government's decision to try the detainees, formerly held in the prisons at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba and Bagram, Afghanistan, in a court of law. But the New York-based group said in a new report that the legal proceedings are unfairly based on little more than allegations by American officials.

"Where there is evidence of criminal activity, persons should be tried in proceedings that comport with international fair trial standards," Human Rights First said in its report. "In Afghanistan, the trials of former Bagram and Guantanamo detainees being conducted since October 2007 fall far short of this mark."

In trials that last between 30 minutes and an hour, defendants have been sentenced to prison terms ranging from three to 20 years, it said.


Thirty minutes to an hour? What kind of trial can be completed in that period of time, unless the defendant pleads guilty?

Among the group's findings:

-- During the trials, no prosecution witnesses and little or no physical evidence are presented.

-- Defense lawyers are not present when a client is interrogated by the prosecution or when intelligence officials collect evidence, so defendants are unable to challenge the evidence or cross-examine witnesses.

-- Lawyers are appointed to the case after the investigation is concluded and generally have only five days to review the government's evidence prior to trial.


Hmmm.

"Consider your verdict, the King said to the jury.

"Not yet, not yet!" the Rabbit hastily interrupted. "There's a great deal to come before that!"

"Call the first witness," said the King; and the White Rabbit blew three blasts on the trumpet, and called out, "First witness!"
....

Here the Queen put on her spectacles, and began staring at the Hatter, who turned pale and fidgeted.

"Give your evidence," said the King; "and don't be nervous, or I'll have you executed on the spot."
....

"No, no!" said the Queen. "Sentence first--verdict afterwards.'

"Stuff and nonsense!" said Alice loudly. "The idea of having the sentence first!"

"Hold your tongue!" said the Queen, turning purple.

"I won't!" said Alice.

"Off with her head!" the Queen shouted at the top of her voice. Nobody moved.


Yes, yes. That's what the trials remind me of.

4 comments:

  1. Fascinating. The farce of the second trial example was written by one completely under the influence of opium; the farce of the first trial examples are organized by those intoxicated by fear. Both are equally powerful.

    ReplyDelete
  2. RR, we are living in Wonderland. A new wonder appears nearly every day.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Will we never make it back through the looking glass?

    ReplyDelete

Anonymous commenters, please sign a name, any name, to distinguish one anonymous commenter from another. Thank you.