Friday, May 23, 2008

Tale Of The Leaking Levee - NOLA

From NOLA.com:

NEW ORLEANS (AP) -- Despite more than $22 million in repairs, a levee that broke with catastrophic effect during Hurricane Katrina is leaking again because of the mushy ground on which New Orleans was built, raising serious questions about the reliability of the city's flood defenses.

Outside engineering experts who have studied the project told The Associated Press that the type of seepage spotted at the 17th Street Canal in the Lakeview neighborhood afflicts other New Orleans levees, too, and could cause some of them to collapse during a storm.
....

Among other things, they repaired the wall by driving interlocking sheets of steel 60 feet into the ground, compared with about 17 feet before the storm. The sheet metal is supposed to prevent canal water from seeping under the levee through the wet, toothpaste-like soil that lies beneath the city, which was built on reclaimed swamp and filled-in marsh.

Over the past few months, however, the corps found evidence that canal water is seeping through the joints in the sheet metal and then rising to the surface on the other side of the levee, forming puddles and other wet spots.


Bear with me, peeps, while we get into some really technical stuff. No, I am not an engineer. I have no expertise whatsoever in levee design or construction. However, I do have a brain that is, on occasion, functional. We went to Lakeview about a year ago to see the repairs which had been made to fill the gaps in the levees. The repaired portions that closed the breaches were reinforced and built better and stronger than the original levee. However, right alongside the reinforced levee sections were the same old levees of the type that failed. It did cross my mind that what the US Corps of Engineers had done didn't make sense and that the older unreinforced levee sections (which were inadequate during Katrina) right next to the new stronger sections could possibly be weakened by the new construction. Is it possible that no engineer working on the project had this same thought? Perhaps. Or perhaps, if they did, they did not give voice to those thoughts.

The joints! It's the joints! The joints that hold the old and the new sections together leak. They don't hold the water back even when there is no hurricane. There is water on the side that the levees are supposed to keep dry, the part where the houses are.

Next month hurricane season begins, but people of New Orleans, do not worry. Everything is under control.

Donald Jolissaint, chief of the corps' technical support branch in New Orleans, denied the problem at the 17th Street Canal is serious.

"I personally do not at all believe that this little wet spot is anything that is going to cause a breach or a failure of any kind," he said. A newly installed floodgate could be used to cut off the flow of water into the canal and reduce pressure on the levee, he said.


What's a little wet spot? It's not an indication of possible future trouble or anything. But, just in case....

Nevertheless, the corps is concerned enough that for weeks, workers have been analyzing the wet spots and digging a 160-foot-long, 10-foot-deep trench to zero in on the source. "We're doing everything we can to chase this down," Jolissaint said.

Read the comments following the article, and you will see that folks in NOLA don't have a lot of confidence in the Corps.

H/T to Scout at First Draft for calling the article to my attention.

9 comments:

  1. I still remember an engineer (a professor, actually) who said the only way to make the levees safe was to build them slowly, letting the earth in them settle and compact before adding another layer: a long, slow, but ultimately safe process.

    That was rejected out of hand.

    Has there been any serious question the construction of the levees has been inadequate? Is there any doubt this problem can be solved (Europe has been solving it in the Netherlands since the Middle Ages)?

    Is there any serious doubt the will to solve simply isn't present?

    I mean, it's just New Orleans. It's not like it's a real American city or anything! Right? Right? Because how long has it been since Katrina? And how much has been done to restore the city?

    I'll retire to Bedlam.....

    ReplyDelete
  2. Oh.
    My.
    God.

    God have mercy is what I really should say...

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm glad steel doesn't rust so they don't have any further worries about the joints.

    ReplyDelete
  4. D'you see where your new governor was being touted as a possible McCain running mate a couple of days back? There again, the other front runner discussed was Crist of Florida. Given the questions that keep surfacing about his sexuality I wouldn't be betting too heavily on him.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The will to do what needs to be done to protect New Orleans is just not there. The patchwork fixes won't fix anything. New Orleans is nearly 400 years old, but it seems to be disposable.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This is really horrifying. I don't know what to say. I'm afraid RMJ is correct.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Sigh. I knew the New Orleans was not being made safe now any more than it had been before. The lack of will to do something about it is just staggering.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Fran said what my first reaction was. Oh my God. Wasn't one Katrina enough for them?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Is New Orleans safer or less safe than it was before Katrina? I'm not sure, but I know one thing. It is not safe.

    ReplyDelete

Anonymous commenters, please sign a name, any name, to distinguish one anonymous commenter from another. Thank you.