Sunday, July 26, 2009

Health Care "Nightmare" In The United States


"Patients without health insurance get dental care at a free clinic in Wise, Virginia, held every July for the past three years. More than 25,000 were treated in a weekend."

From the Observer:

When an insurance firm boss saw a field hospital for the poor in Virginia, he knew he had to speak out. Here, he tells Paul Harris of his fears for Obama's bid to bring about radical change.

It was July 2007 and Potter, a senior executive at giant US healthcare firm Cigna, was visiting relatives in the poverty-ridden mountain districts of northeast Tennessee. He saw an advert in a local paper for a touring free medical clinic at a fairground just across the state border in Wise County, Virginia.

Potter, who had worked at Cigna for 15 years, decided to check it out. What he saw appalled him. Hundreds of desperate people, most without any medical insurance, descended on the clinic from out of the hills. People queued in long lines to have the most basic medical procedures carried out free of charge. Some had driven more than 200 miles from Georgia. Many were treated in the open air. Potter took pictures of patients lying on trolleys on rain-soaked pavements.

For Potter it was a dreadful realisation that healthcare in America had failed millions of poor, sick people and that he, and the industry he worked for, did not care about the human cost of their relentless search for profits. "It was over-powering. It was just more than I could possibly have imagined could be happening in America," he told the Observer.


Potter was an insider, an executive in a high position at Cigna. He knew well the insider workings of the health care company, the tricks to delay, deny coverage, confuse their clients, and dump sick people from their plan. He resigned and began to tell the insider story, which is ugly. The chief focus of the company is on the bottom line and getting money into the pockets of shareholders, rather than arranging for their clients get health care.

Obama, faced with 47 million Americans without health insurance, has put reforming the system at the top of his agenda. If he succeeds, he will have pushed through one of the greatest changes to domestic policy of any president. If he fails, his presidency could be broken before it is even a year old.
....

Obama's plans are now mired and the opponents of reform are winning. The Republican attack machine has cranked into gear, labelling reform as "socialist" and warning ordinary Americans that government bureaucrats, not doctors, will choose their medicines. The bill's opponents say the huge cost can only be paid by massive tax increases on ordinary Americans and that others will have their current healthcare plans taken away. Many centrist Democratic congressmen, wary of their conservative voters, are wavering. The legislation has failed to meet Obama's August deadline and is now delayed until after the summer recess. Many fear that this loss of momentum could kill it altogether.


The "centrist Democratic congressmen", who call themselves Blue Dogs, are not centrists at all. They are conservatives, and for all the good that they do for the Democratic Party, they'd just as well switch over to the Republican Party. My two senators, Vitter-R and Landrieu-D and my representative Melancon-D (two out of the three label themselves Democrats) voted against the anti-torture bill, for crying out loud. Now the Blue Dogs are amongst the crowd who shout the loudest, "What's the hurry to pass health reform"? They're in no hurry. They have good government "socialistic" health care. The health care industry gives them big money. Why the rush?

The healthcare industry generates enormous profits and its top executives have a lavish corporate lifestyle that he once shared. Treating patients for their expensive conditions is bad for business as it reduces the bottom line. Kicking out patients who pursue claims makes perfect economic sense. "It is a system that is rigged against the policyholder," Potter said. The congressional probe found that just three firms had rescinded more than 20,000 policyholders between 2003 and 2007, saving hundreds of millions. "That's a lot of money that will now go towards their profits," Potter said.

A lot of that money also goes into contributions to politicians of both parties - $372m in the past nine years - and in lobbying groups to run TV ads slamming Obama's plans. Many of these ads deploy naked scare tactics. One report said that the industry was spending $1.4m a day on its campaign. In the face of that, it is perhaps no wonder that the Senate has delayed its vote, dealing a massive blow to Obama. "I have seen how the opponents of healthcare reform go to work... they are trying to delay action. They know that if they keep the process going for months, and turn it into a big mess, then the political impetus behind it will lessen," Potter said.


Read all about the so-called "centrist Democratic congressmen" claim to be concerned about spending and deficits that will follow health care reform at Salon, also linked above.

Nobody could be better positioned than the Democrats who call themselves "Blue Dogs" to sabotage healthcare reform, the primary objective of their president and the signature issue of their party for more than 60 years. Thanks to fawning publicity in the mainstream media that persistently describes them as fiscally conservative and ideologically moderate, the Blue Dogs enjoy an almost unassailable position in the middle of Washington's stunted political spectrum.

What supposedly troubles the Blue Dogs these days is the estimated cost of healthcare reform.
....

If the Blue Dogs were truly worried about wasteful spending, they might use their influence to curb the outrageous looting of the federal Treasury by defense contractors, which remains by far the largest drain on the public purse. They might have spoken out against the brazen theft of billions of dollars by private contractors in Iraq, whose thievery harmed troops as well as taxpayers. They might have cautioned against squandering hundreds of billions of dollars on programs that don't work and probably never will, from the F-22 jet fighter to the Ballistic Missile Defense System.
....

Let's recall that the founder of the House Blue Dog caucus -- and still a guiding mentor to its members -- is Billy Tauzin, a Democrat from Louisiana who helped start the group in 1994 and then jumped ship to the Republicans a year later. Just months before he retired from Congress in 2005, he pushed through the Medicare prescription drug bill, guaranteeing hundreds of billions in waste and enormous profits for the drug companies.

As soon as he left Congress, Tauzin became the chief lobbyist for the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, where he makes sure the Blue Dogs never get carried away with any of that rhetoric about fiscal prudence or holding down costs -- by writing generous checks.


Yep. That's our boy Billy, who came from humble surroundings in what we fondly call the "Bay Area" near Thibodaux, the small rural community named Chackbay. He and his fellow Louisianians in the Congress have inhabited the rarefied air in DC so long that they have forgotten what life is like for the the great majority of their constituents.

13 comments:

  1. An absolutely horrifying account!

    ReplyDelete
  2. and now we know....it really isn't about fiscal conservatism... it's about who benefits?... the people, or the corporations.

    (sigh)

    ReplyDelete
  3. It's like before the Iraq War, when you did what you could to convince the leaders not to do it, but you knew that the war was inevitable.

    I'm beginning to feel that way about health care reform not getting done. I'm furious with the Blue Dogs, but what good is that?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Also, Diane, it's about the fact that the Republicans destroyed the Democrats on Healthcare in 1994 and they see it as their opportunity - probably their only opportunity - to derail them in 2010

    The party of God and Morality has no hesitation throwing the sick and weak under the rollers of its Juggernaut.

    ReplyDelete
  5. DeMint, by the way, is pimping himself out for the cash and place in the 2012 presidential primary line-up that slipped through Mark Sanford's fingers last month.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Congress as a whole, both parties, take enormous amounts of contributions from drug companies and insurers, and so does Barack Obama. Our president has more corporate insiders within his cabinet than any president preceding him, so to just say that Blue-dDogs and Republicans are to blame is ridiculous. The plan they are talking about now will limit care and not the profits. Its disgusting. It isn't real reform.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Gregg, do you know what I really want? Cover everyone with something like Medicare or VA coverage. Why should any insurance company make profits off sick people? At least real Democrats and the president are more willing to kick against the pricks.

    The whole edifice of health care is on the verge of collapse. I suspect that nothing will be done until that happens. What is the Republican plan? They have no plan. What is your plan? Don't just harp on Obama. Tell me what is your solution. I want everyone covered. How would you do it?

    ReplyDelete
  8. We have a National Health Service. It isn't perfect by any means and your Republicans pick on its worst aspects to bolster their opposition to universal healthcare provided free at the point of need.

    No it isn't perfect: I might have to wait in Accident and Emergency for a couple of hours while cases are prioritised. I might have to wait some months for an appointment with a specialist for some non-emergency condition and in some parts of the country NHS dental care is sparse but I will never have to wait for a passing medical roadshow.

    Most of Europe has a variation on this system but all a Republican needs to do is whisper "Socialism" and many take to the hills.

    Big busineness wins over the needs of ordinary folk again.

    ReplyDelete
  9. DP, if you think that we don't have long waits in the ER, think again. Part of the reason for the back-up is that folks with no health insurance wait until their conditions become emergencies, because they can't pay for doctor visits or medical tests. ERs are not allowed to turn people away, so there is the added burden of people who are not in an emergency health crisis and could well be treated in a doctor's office going to the ER, because they can't afford to pay doctor bills. The doctors and hospitals often don't get paid for caring for the poor in the ER, so they increase prices for the rest of us to make up the loss. It's a shameful and terrible mess.

    ReplyDelete
  10. DeMint is a piece of work. His goal is not to improve health care. His goal is to destroy Obama. Here's a quote from him from an earlier post:

    Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC) on the stakes in delaying a health care vote past August: "If we're able to stop Obama on this it will be his Waterloo. It will break him."

    Beautiful, isn't it?

    ReplyDelete
  11. This very incident was reported I think Sunday, in the big conservative daily over here...

    ReplyDelete

Anonymous commenters, please sign a name, any name, to distinguish one anonymous commenter from another. Thank you.