Wednesday, August 5, 2009

Not Only Little England

From Giles Fraser in the Church Times on the Archbishop of Canterbury's reflections on GC09. Giles speaks of the two-tier system as it now exists in the Church of England:

Actually, we have been something like a two-tier Church for a while, but the nature of this division is different from the one Dr Williams des­cribes. One tier is called the Church of England; the other is called Ang­lican­ism. Ordinary people in the pews are members of the former; those with “representative func­tions” — bishops and the like — are often of the latter.

The Church of England has always had a slight little-Englander mentality. Mrs Jones, who has always worshipped at St Agatha’s, knows that there is a wider international side to the Church — she reads about it in the diocesan newsletter. But it means about as much to her as the fact that her town is twinned with somewhere in France which she has never been to.

She is happy to give to needy causes abroad, but, for her, church means St Agatha’s: Sunday eucharist, the choir, the people. Her views may be more conservative or more liberal than the person praying next to her, but that doesn’t matter much. She still cycles to communion through the morning mist.

This may be a dated caricature, but the genius of the Church of England has been to allow different theological temperaments to wor­ship alongside one other, united by common prayer and community spirit. This was how we recognised each other as members of the same Church. This was our particular charism, and we were widely valued for it.


I don't think that Giles' description is dated, nor is the mentality confined to little England. All church is local. I've spoken before about my several years in the Episcopal Church when I hardly even paid attention to the activities of my diocese, much less the national church, or the Anglican Communion, except as they affected my parish church. I've also acknowledged a feeling of nostalgia for my period of innocence and ignorance.

The majority of my congregation probably functions principally within the local church mentality. Only when it becomes obvious that decisions made higher up will affect our parish, do they begin to pay attention.

In Anglicanism, however, the joys of common prayer and community spirit are replaced by ideology. This Anglican Church is a new invention, a global piece of post-colonial hubris, driven by those who feel that a Church that is genuinely Catholic must have outposts throughout the world.

Bishops get on planes and fly to other parts of the world to sit in com­mittees with other bishops, hammer­ing out policy — although no one in the secular world cares two hoots about what they decide. Over time, these meetings have created a new Church with a single-issue magis­terium based on an unhealthy fascina­tion with what gay people do in their bedrooms. This, apparently, is how we are to recognise each other as Anglicans.

That is not how Mrs Jones recog­nises members of her church. She says hello to them in the street. They sit near her in the pews. To replace all this by ideology is the single greatest mistake my Church has ever made.


Wow! Giles couldn't have stated it more plainly. Would that his Church of England brother, the Archbishop of Canterbury, would speak in such plain language and with such wisdom.

I am sooo tired of the "single-issue magisterium" of sex, sex, sex. I may work those words into a sidebar quote.

Anglicanism is and should be about much more than that. When I travel, I enjoy visiting Episcopal churches in other areas of the US and Anglican churches abroad and being able to worship in similar, but not quite the same, services as at home, in knowing that we shared the basics of beliefs, whatever different meanings we attributed to the basics, and without being too much troubled about the differences. Our conversations on the faith after the services began from common ground. The common ground is now crumbling beneath our feet because of the undue emphasis on ideology and sex, sex, sex. More's the pity.

H/T to JB Chilton at The Lead for the link.

12 comments:

  1. Very true - and very well said. But I think things are changing now. At last people seem to come to their senses realizing how dangerous these revolutionary novelties are to communion and the Church.

    And the Church is all of us, not just Bishops and Priests and Deacons.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Mimi, I agree with you and with Giles Fraser. Most of my parishioners and most of the clergy I know don't give a fig about Anglicanism except in the vaguest of ways. I do, though, because for eight years I worshiped in Vienna in a church where the Anglican Communion meant something, but that something was also very local. I worshiped with Anglicans from England, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the Caribbean, Ireland, Pakistan, India, Nigeria and so on, but they were specific individuals known to me. Our theological views varied dramatically, but that didn't matter. We belonged to Christ Church Vienna. It was, for most of us, a home away from home.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Göran, some Anglican bishops and bishops in the Episcopal church don't seem to "get" that the church is all of us.

    Amelia, the home away from home is what I speak of, too. I hope that we can hold on to that and to the mission to the Anglicans around the world who are much less fortunate than we are here in the US.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Power corrupts, and frequent flyer miles corrupt more.

    As counterlight commented in response to the same article,
    In a world where an openly gay man can win 42% of the vote in the 2007 election for mayor of Dallas, Texas, these ecclesiastical obsessions are starting to look very quaint.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Well said Grandmere, and Goran too. Sometimes, when you watch some of the 'single issue magisterium' proponents carrying on, it seems as if they have developed a theology of the episcopate of all believers; at least, of all believers that matter...

    ReplyDelete
  6. I don't think it's the sex sex sex, so much as it's the ideology ideology ideology. Now, salvation appears to depend on how we score on a doctrinal pop quiz. Our blood and urine will now be tested for liberal tendencies. I could see a similar test for conservative tendencies.

    Religion, like politics, has become Procrustes' bed and we had all better fit on it or else!

    So much for "and ye shall find rest unto your souls."

    ReplyDelete
  7. Tell me again. Who is it that will be "left behind"?

    Counterlight, the doctrinal purity thingy is huge, but I can't help but think that there is in the mix an obsession with sex.

    But in the end, it's about power.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Jake's Place is now back up. That should help fight off Anglican creep.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Mike, that is great news. Thanks for letting me know.

    ReplyDelete
  10. He's also on Facebook as Jake Worldstopper.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Mike, I know, I know. I just made friends with Jake over there. We're brand new friends and old friends at the same time. We are also still virtual friends. Oh, the wonders of technology!

    ReplyDelete
  12. That should help fight off Anglican creep.

    Which one?

    ReplyDelete

Anonymous commenters, please sign a name, any name, to distinguish one anonymous commenter from another. Thank you.