A widening child sexual abuse inquiry in Europe has landed at the doorstep of Pope Benedict XVI, as a senior church official acknowledged Friday that a German archdiocese made “serious mistakes” in handling an abuse case while the pope served as its archbishop.
The archdiocese said that a priest accused of molesting boys was given therapy in 1980 and later allowed to resume pastoral duties, before committing further abuses and being prosecuted. Pope Benedict, who at the time headed the archdiocese of Munich and Freising, approved the priest’s transfer for therapy. A subordinate took full responsibility for allowing the priest to later resume pastoral work, the archdiocese said in a statement.
The Vatican spokesman, the Rev. Federico Lombardi, said he had no comment beyond the statement by the Archdiocese of Munich and Freising, which he said showed the “nonresponsibility” of the pope in the matter. (My emphasis)
And we are to take the statement by the Rev. Lombardi at face value? Not if we attend to the words of Fr Thomas P Doyle.
The priest from Essen, “despite allegations of sexual abuse, and in spite of a conviction — was repeatedly assigned work in the sphere of pastoral care by the then-Vicar General Gerhard Gruber,” who worked under Benedict, at the time Archbishop Joseph Ratzinger.
....
But Mr. Gruber took full responsibility for the decision to reinstate the priest to pastoral work. “I deeply regret that this decision resulted in offenses against youths and apologize to all who were harmed by it,” Mr. Gruber, according to a statement posted on the archdiocese Web site.
There was immediate skepticism that Benedict, as archbishop, would not have known of the details of the case.
Rev. Thomas P. Doyle, who once worked at the Vatican Embassy in Washington and became an early and well-known whistle-blower on sexual abuse in the church, said the vicar general’s claim was not credible.
“Nonsense,” said Father Doyle, who has served as an expert witness in sexual abuse lawsuits. “Pope Benedict is a micro-manager. He’s the old style. Anything like that would necessarily have been brought to his attention. Tell the vicar general to find a better line. What he’s trying to do, obviously, is protect the pope.”
I take no pleasure in writing this post. In fact, I feel sick. I'm no admirer of Benedict XVI, and I never was. I remember him as Cardinal Ratzinger in his role as Prefect of the Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith, or the Enforcer, as he was known in the US. The theologians, presidents, and professors in the Roman Catholic universities, and certain bishops dreaded his periodic visits to the US to assure that all were following the orthodox line. The list is long of the great thinkers and teachers in the RCC who were silenced or otherwise disciplined by Cardinal Ratzinger. Although I had been out of the RCC for nearly 10 years, my heart sank low when he was elected pope. He was not an unknown. My heart sank for the sake of my many family members and friends who are still part of the church.
As pope his policies and practices have been even worse than I expected. I think of him declaring just last year that married couples in which one partner is HIV positive are forbidden to use condoms.
From CNN:
Pope Benedict XVI refused Wednesday to soften the Vatican's ban on condom use as he arrived in Africa for his first visit to the continent as pope.
He landed in Cameroon, the first stop on a trip that will also take him to Angola.
Sub-Saharan Africa has been hit harder by AIDS and HIV than any other region of the world, according to the United Nations and World Health Organization. There has been fierce debate between those who advocate the use of condoms to help stop the spread of the epidemic and those who oppose it.
The pontiff reiterated the Vatican's policy on condom use as he flew from Rome to Yaounde, the capital of Cameroon, CNN Vatican analyst John Allen said.
Pope Benedict has always made it clear he intends to uphold the traditional Catholic teaching on artificial contraception -- a "clear moral prohibition" -- Allen said. But his remarks Tuesday were among the first times he stated the policy explicitly since he became pope nearly four years ago.
The world and the Roman Catholic Church would be better off if the pope resigned. There I've said it.
Other recent posts on child abuse in the Roman Catholic Church at Wounded Bird are here, here, here, and here.
There is so much silence, rationalizing, rearranging, pretend and outright denial going on amongst the RC clergy...that´s not by accident I don´t think.
ReplyDeleteAnd yet, Leo, if you look at the local churches, you will see priests and people going about doing God's work and building the Kingdom of God, despite the misdeeds of the leaders.
ReplyDeleteIt was my opinion of the previous Pope which prevented me from converting to Roman Catholicism despite my great admiration for both the religious and laity with whom I worked in Catholic schools. I have always thought of Benedict as a step backwards. Fortunately I have found Anglicans who are not like the Calvinists that run my previous diocese.
ReplyDeleteBrian, I'm so pleased that you're out of Sydney and in a place where you're at home in your church. Many of John Paul II's policies were problematic, too, and he enabled Cardinal Ratzinger's invasions.
ReplyDelete"I think of him declaring just last year that married couples in which one partner is HIV positive are forbidden to use condoms"
ReplyDeleteHe did??? I am sorry but how much more backward can one get? So you supposedly preserve the sanctity of life, that is of the unborn, but don't worry about transmission of HIV from one partner to the other???
The late Penny LeRoux's book on the Vatican that came out in about 1988 focused a lot on him, as well as in her book on Latin America. Any theologian he censured, I read.
wv: mines. Says it all.
Caminante, you didn't know about the forbidden condoms? The culture of life, don't you know?
ReplyDeleteI think you're right, Mimi. Really, when you think about it, no one whose nickname is The Enforcer should be allowed to run any part of a church to start with. Just my opinion.
ReplyDeleteI noticed a striking absence of Catholic piety and allegiance when I traveled to Ireland 2 years ago.
ReplyDeleteAnd the churches in Italy are looking and feeling more and more like museums.
Meanwhile, the American Church (St. James Episcopal) in Florence is incorporating more Italian into its services to accommodate a growing Italian membership (mostly Italian spouses of Americans, but disillusioned Catholics all the same; I met an Italian there who intends to become an Episcopal priest, and would love to establish an Episcopal seminary in Italy).
It was English only and not an Italian in sight when I first visited that church 20 years ago.
La Chiesa Romana may be about to face that "adapt or die" moment in Europe.
I doubt La Tedescha will resign.
I was no fan of her predecessor either.
The early assumption that this was an "American" problem never did hold water for me.
ReplyDeleteI thought about adding these words from the Times to article:
ReplyDelete“What is at stake, and at great risk, is Benedict’s central project for the ‘re-Christianization’ of Christendom, his desire to have Europe return to its Christian roots,” said David Gibson, the author of a biography of Benedict and a religion commentator for Politicsdaily.com. “But if the root itself is seen as rotten, then his influence will be badly compromised.”
Re-Christianize Europe? And have La Tedescha as the dictator of Europe? Jesus did not come to establish Christendom.
I felt the way you did when Ratzinger became the Bishop of Rome. I couldn't stand his policies as the Enforcer, and am not surprised at the attempt to distance him from sex abuse scandals in Germany.
ReplyDeleteOf course, The Enforcer and John Paul II were of the same mind about the discipline policy.
ReplyDeleteWhy can't I find a job that combines "nonresponsibility" with "infallibility"?
ReplyDeleteThis seems wrong.
The best of all possible worlds, surely.
ReplyDeleteA sad, sad story of denial, abuse, and the horror of hubris. Vicar of Christ, indeed....
ReplyDeleteAs to the Vicar of Christ, the red shoes should have been a clue....
ReplyDeleteNo condoms if one spouse is HIV positive? That is not the culture of life; it is the culture of death. That is just the pure essence of evil.
ReplyDeleteBoocat, evil? Yes, while the pope stays with his precious tradition. The truth of it is that the "clear moral prohibition" is in his wicked policy.
ReplyDeleteI too would like to have a job that combines infallibility with nonresponsibility. Next time there's a papal election, I think I'll try to get on the ballot. Not to mince words, but I do think I'd be a good pope.
ReplyDeleteThe problem with ratty resigning is that they'd just elect another one, likely not much better.
I'd prefer him to say the following:
ReplyDelete"Speaking Ex Cathedra I declare that, henceforth, neither I nor any future Bishop of Rome am, at ANY time, Infallible."
...then resign.
Lindy, I believe you'd make an excellent pope. I'd do my part to make the white smoke come out of the chimney of the Sistine Chapel for you. What would we shout out? "Viva il Papa!" doesn't seem quite right.
ReplyDeleteThe College of Cardinals is replete with conservatives appointed by John Paul II and Benny, and they will likely have their way in choosing the next pope. But then there was the surprise in John XXIII, when the cardinals believed that they had elected an old man who'd be a housekeeper pope who wouldn't do very much.
JCF, that would be lovely, but what are the chances?