From The Huffington Post:
Hundreds of sex abuse victims have come forward in Belgium with harrowing accounts of molestation by Catholic clergy that reportedly led to at least 13 suicides and affected children as young as two, a special commission said Friday.
Professor Peter Adriaenssens, chairman of the commission, said the abuse in Belgium may have been even more rampant than the 200-page report suggests.
"Reality is worse than what we present here today because not everyone shares such things automatically in a first contact with the commission," he told reporters.
Adriaenssens, a child psychiatrist who has worked with trauma victims for 23 years, said nothing had prepared him for the stories of abuse that blighted the lives of victims.
"We don't just talk about touching. We are talking about oral and anal abuse, forced masturbation and mutual masturbation. We talk about people who have gone through serious abuse," Adriaenssens said.
....
Friday's report said 507 witnesses came forward with stories of molestation at the hands of clergy over the past decades. It says those abused included children who were two, four, five and six years old.
Family members or friends said 13 victims committed suicide that "was related to sexual abuse by clergy," the report said. Six other witnesses said they had attempted suicide.
"It is notable how often one issue comes back in the witness reports: the high number of suicides," the report said.
The subsequent link which follows persuaded me to post on the story.
From Fox News back in June of this year:
Pope Benedict XVI lashed out Sunday at what he called the "deplorable" raids carried out by Belgian police who detained bishops, confiscated computers, opened a crypt and took church documents as part of an investigation into priestly sex abuse.
Benedict made a rare personal entry into the escalating diplomatic dispute with Belgium, issuing a message of solidarity to the head of the Belgian bishops' conference and other bishops who were detained in the June 24 raid.
....
Belgium's justice minister defended the searches on Sunday, saying the bishops were treated normally and that the search warrant was fully legitimate.
....
Benedict said he wanted to write to Belgium's bishops "at this sad moment" to express his solidarity "for the surprising and deplorable way in which the searches were conducted." He noted that the monthly meeting of the bishops was set to discuss clerical abuse.
The pope didn't get what is truly deplorable in Belgium and around the world. Poor bishops. How they suffered at the hands of the law enforcement authorities. What about the children, your Holiness? What about the suicides, your Holiness? What about the families and friends who lost their loved ones, your Holiness?
In addition to being sickened by the stories of what took place in Belgium, I'm sickened by the pope's response to the raids.
Lapin sent the links.
The man is sick...it´s not catching, we´re now in the preventative stage.
ReplyDeleteI am sickened too. No wonder so few people go to church in Europe. And I thought it was bad here. When will they ever learn?
ReplyDeleteWhat IS it with the man?
ReplyDeleteI don't think he cares. He's a prince desparate to save his crown.
ReplyDeleteCounterlight, you're probably right. You'd think he'd at least pretend to care.
ReplyDeleteThe English will soon have him to start the process of making a saint - as though he has the power to make a saint.
It is truly, remarkably disgusting. It's the utter corruption of an institution. Right now I'm feeling like all our institutions are in some sort of End Times.
ReplyDeleteIf you put it that way: with the Omega comes the Alpha, IT.
ReplyDelete[Over dinner tonight, caught the end of The Fountainhead (Dad had started watching it, amazed to see Gary Cooper without a cowboy hat on! Turner Classic is saluting Patricia Neal, RIP). Very revealing: La Rand has much to answer for, IMO, re her Individual Uber Alles philosophy, and its affect on our (dying) institutions. Just not, y'know, the RCC. It had its own Death Wish.]
God bless TEC!
Excellent, provoking piece - Sex and death lie at the poisoned heart of religion - by Polly Toynbee, president of the British Humanist Association, in this morning's Guardian.
ReplyDeleteThis is unbelievable.
ReplyDeleteHow can he so consistently miss the point?
And how can he not know that his responses make it all worse rather than better?
And this is supposed to be one of the most intelligent men in religion!
The man is unfit to be pope and a disgrace to the office.
ReplyDeleteI'm baffled, except for concluding that the pope is surrounded by advisors who encourage hunkering down, defending their own, and tightening the reins on the rest of the flock - a sure strategy which will lead to further disastrous results.
ReplyDeleteAnd this organization is what certain of the Anglo-Catholics in England want to be part of? Stupefying.
Still, at the institutional level, the church of Becket, Torquemada & Pius IX. A church so lacking in self-insight that it imagines, 3 1/2 centuries after the fact, that it has the authority to "rehabilitate" Galileo, and supposes that that act has any meaning.
ReplyDeleteLapin, Polly Toynbee makes several interesting points in her piece in the Guardian. Much of what she says is true, but like others in the secularlist/humanist camp, she tends to assume a stance amongst the persecuted, which I find off-putting. After all, some of us amongst the people of faith agree with her on many of the issues, and she does not acknowledge that, once again, if only by implication, painting with too broad a brush in her characterization of believers.
ReplyDeleteAnd, indeed, what good does it do that the powers of the church acknowledge that Galileo was right several centuries after the fact?
Did Fox News really just post that second story? ... It first surfaced in June. Not that that makes a difference to the central point - yes, the Pope is totally out of touch. Obviously the police have every right to raid bishops' homes, seize computers and take documents in the course of carrying out their investigations.
ReplyDeleteCathy, the Fox story is from back in June. Still the juxtaposition of the two is interesting as further information comes out which makes the raid seem all the more justified. I edited the post to show clearly that the Fox story is not recent.
ReplyDeleteFair enough. I didn't post on this earlier because I was sure I'd read the Fox story some time ago. Nothing has changed between June and now though in terms of what the Vatican thinks.
ReplyDeleteI find it repugnant that he is referred to as "Your Holiness." I don't believe there is anything at all holy about the man. I find him to be so morally bankrupt that I simply do not understand how anyone could follow any directive he issues. If that came off as a rant, please forgive me, but I have my own early adolescent abuse issues.
ReplyDeleteBooCat, not a rant at all.
ReplyDeleteThat the pope, or anyone, for that matter, permits another to address him by such a title is prideful and a disgrace.
Just want to say, as a Galileo partisan, that there was something of value in their sort-of retraction. They actually admitted, if too hesitantly and weakly, that the Holy Mother Church had got the business wrong. How often does that happen? Ever?
ReplyDeleteAnd the Pope Himself (blasphemous capitalization deliberate) stated that Galileo got the theology right, and the professionals were wrong. Good times.
(And the Internet still swarms with people who on this issue are more Catholic than the Pope, a phrase for which I have new respect. It almost makes a person believe in Original Sin.)
But as to this Pope, I'm not much upset by the Belgium remarks. He jumped the shark months ago with his conciliatory letter to Ireland. Which was appalling. In the immediate aftermath, government investigations of the hierarchy's behavior were being demanded - by Irish Catholic priests.
After that, any outrage this Pope commits is just, as they'd say on Wall Street, a dead shark bounce.
A damning piece - "The case against Vatican power" - in the New Statesman.
ReplyDeleteIncidentally, I see that when the Queen meets Ratzinger she will be required to wear a black dress. Seems - see the opening paragraph of the New Statesman piece - that "only Catholic queens can wear white in the pontifical presence". Working the brain frantically to think if I have ever seen a Catholic Queen wearing a white dress.
Porlock, you have a point about the Vatican's admission that they got it wrong with Galileo. Sadly, Galileo himself did not benefit from the acknowledgement.
ReplyDeleteSince the story of the abuses in European countries first broke, the pope has not said much that is proper or right.
Lapin, I haven't read the New Statesman piece yet, but I like what the blogger at your link on the black dress said:
ReplyDeleteAs our American friends say, WTF???
She's the bloody queen. She can wear what she wants. If he doesn't like it, so what? What gives him the right to say what someone wears when they meet him?
Yes, indeed!
I can highly recommend The George Carey Fan Club, the blog on which the comments were posted. The e e cummings link I emailed to you yesterday is from the same blog. Proprietor Poppy Tupper.
ReplyDeleteLapin, the blog is interesting, but I am not a fan of George Carey. He caused us a load of grief at the 1998 Lambeth Conference by his support of Resolution 1.10.
ReplyDelete"This blog is not authorised by anyone called George Carey. It is simply the thoughts of a heartfelt admirer of the greatest Archbishop of Canterbury of modern times - scholar, statesman, theologian."
ReplyDeleteEvidently you Americans still don't "do" irony, Mimi.
Evidently you Americans still don't "do" irony, Mimi.
ReplyDeleteLapin, I try, but apparently I fail at times. I thought the blogger was serious about Carey. My mistake, certainly.