Monday, October 11, 2010

AND YOU THOUGHT YOU'D HEARD IT ALL

From Candace Chellew-Hodge at Religious Dispatches:

Despite having heard a lot of bluster from the religious right over the years, they still sometimes have the ability to say something so totally brand new, and patently offensive, that it just knocks the wind right out of me. Take this gem quoted in the Colorado Springs Gazette over the weekend in a story about the recent rash of gay teen suicides:

Peter Sprigg, senior fellow for policy studies at the Family Research Council in Washington, D.C., said the rash September suicides by gays might be linked to the students believing they were born gay. “That creates hopelessness,” he said. “It is more loving and compassionate to say you don’t have to be gay for the rest of your lives.”


What would be far more loving and compassionate is for Sprigg and his compatriots to actually engage in a true act of compassion. “Compassion” literally means “to suffer with” or “suffer together.” We can only have compassion for someone when we understand, on a deeply personal level, what, exactly, is the other person’s struggle.

He said that?!!! Well, yes he did. In the name of compassion, no less, Peter Sprigg said that. As the author says, you thought you'd heard it all.

What makes the thought of be “being gay for the rest of your lives” such a horrible, shameful, terrible thought to even bear consideration is because Sprigg and people like him dedicate their entire careers to making the lives of gays and lesbians so incredibly miserable. They produce ridiculous studies full of lies that no reputable psychologist or social scientist would touch with a ten foot pole and when their scientific lies are exposed they play the religion card and say, “well, God didn’t create you gay.”

Just yesterday, included in the the readings from the Lectionary, which were referenced in the two sermons to which I linked, is the story of Ruth, the Moabite, the foreigner, the outcast, the despised, who - surprise! - was given the honor of becoming the great-grandmother of one of the greatest heroes in the Hebrew Testament, King David.

From another reading is the story of Jesus healing ten lepers. Lepers were only permitted in the company of other lepers, but Jesus allowed the lepers to approach him, and he sent them on their way telling them they would be healed. And all ten were healed, but only one returned to thank Jesus, a Samaritan, a twofold outcast, one of the despised that the Jewish people had nothing to do with. Jesus sent the Samaritan off again with the words "...your faith has made you well."

That Ruth and the Samaritan were amongst the despised by the people at the time was of no consequence to God's/Jesus' decision to mark them with favor.

Are there lessons in these stories from the Scriptures for us today about how we view and act toward those who may be numbered amongst the despised, the outcasts, the different, those who are not like us? May we claim that our compassion is godly, if it is offered with conditions attached?

Thanks to Cathy for the link.

13 comments:

  1. Wow. Candace's response is right on.

    I remember reading somewhere, and quoting it in one of my blog posts, that whenever we draw a line between ourselves and someone else, we'll find God on the other side of that line. God stands with those others reject, including those whom we reject. I try to remember that.

    Penny

    ReplyDelete
  2. Penny, this is the first I've heard of the root of the word compassion as "suffer with".

    Very interesting what you say about drawing lines and where God is. Food for thought, surely.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Nothing out of the right wing surprises me anymore. Our Republican candidate for governor is proving to be a real piece of work. At a time where elected officials seriously and publicly entertain the idea of repealing or changing the 14th Amendment, nothing surprises me. As the historian Gordon Craig always pointed out, right wing politics is always the most radical politics.

    Hannah Arendt discusses the root of the word compassion extensively, and she points out just how new and revolutionary was Jesus' understanding of the word.
    Leave it to a secular Jew to point out to dimwitted Christians the original and revolutionary quality of their Savior's teachings.

    ReplyDelete
  4. WOW That is an amazing quote. Just when you think they should run out of stupid the "religious right" (which is neither) finds another mother load.

    FWIW
    jimB

    ReplyDelete
  5. I'm still surprised when Peter Sprigg and his ilk claim that their words and acts of bigotry are done in the name of love and compassion. I'll never learn.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Peter Sprigg's Family Research Council is the group that was co-founded by George Reckers, Mimi.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Mimi, thanks for this lovely and very timely post. Alas, if only more people saw things as clearly as you do. I've been trying to convey the significance of the recent suicides and the tremendous response to the It Gets Better Project to my kinfolk in Louisiana and Florida for a couple of weeks now, by emails - but while they swear they love me, they seem utterly unmoved for the plight of all my LGBT brothers and sisters, and for the dead. And seem to think there's something wrong with *me* for feeling outraged over all this. They just don't get it. Sad.

    Appreciate you.

    ReplyDelete
  8. That quote from Peter Sprigg, I am still utterly, I can't even say how staggered, a day or so after first having read it. The arrogance and hypocrisy are breathtaking. They really are.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Lapin, that would be George (He's only carrying my luggage) Rekers.

    And seem to think there's something wrong with *me* for feeling outraged over all this.

    Russ, then there's something wrong with me, too. I hope your kinfolk wake up.

    Cathy, couldn't we have used a luggage carrier on our marathon travel day, transferring from the car to ferries and trains? KJ would have done it for us, but he was too far away.

    ReplyDelete
  10. We could so have used a luggage carrier. But the one we had handy was unwilling. (Ahem.) I'll shut up now. (starts humming)

    wv - stracial. Who is St Racial?! You can't make this stuff up.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Well, the one we had had, had handy. I must get me grammatical tenses right.

    ReplyDelete
  12. ...the one we had had, had handy.

    If you say so, Cathy.

    ReplyDelete

Anonymous commenters, please sign a name, any name, to distinguish one anonymous commenter from another. Thank you.