Saturday, November 6, 2010

LAND OF THE FREE


From Elizabeth Wurtzel, who is American, but the article is in the Guardian, which, last I heard, was a newspaper in England:

Hard to say precisely what it is that people – "folks", as President Obama likes to call them – are so darn exercised about, but they say things that show that their command of any words with more than two syllables is completely questionable, like: "The president is a socialist", or "healthcare reform is unconstitutional". Of course, what they want to say, and what they should say, is something to the effect that they hate this man that those people elected president and they want to kill him – but only people like me, elitists with Ivy League degrees – people who actually have read Das Kapital and who have studied constitutional law – talk trash like that.
....

Look, America is a very sad place right now, which is what the Tea Party movement and the midterm elections are about. I could analyse the particulars, but then I would be no better than the whole 24-hour media machine – which, given that unemployment is at 9.6%, is lucky that no one has noticed that they don't exactly do their job. If the news outlets were actually reporting, they would tell us the honest and awful truth: the United States is a post-industrial empire in decline, like England or Belgium or worse (is there worse?). There is no next. We are at next.

And truthfully, it would not be so bad, if we could only come to terms with who we are: we are an amazing country still, but not in the way we believe. We are, in fact, kind of nerdy. We decry elitism, and yet it is precisely the high-falutin' stuff that we are good at. We still have the best research universities on the planet – every world survey puts Harvard, Berkeley and Stanford at the top – and we still have companies like Apple and Google that no one else on earth can come up with. And, of course, our creative industries – movies and music – are still our biggest import, even if piracy is deflating their value.
....

Yes, the United States is still the great meritocracy it's always been; but now, if you aren't brilliant or beautiful or both, there isn't much to do, because they can do it cheaper in Shanghai or Mumbai. The Tea Party people should enjoy their rallies, because the rest of it is, indeed, quite bleak.

For the first time in American history, then, social mobility has been replaced with class struggle. Europeans have always been mystified that poor people in this country don't rise up and throw potatoes at Donald Trump – instead, they make him a reality TV star. But that's because everyone here us sure they are going to be rich like him someday, too. Maybe tomorrow.

And yes, you should read Wurtzel's piece in its entirety, despite the fact that it's published in a foreign newspaper. She's mostly right. I wonder if she could be published in a major newspaper here in the US. Her truth-telling may paint far too bleak a picture for consumers of the "news" over here. In truth, not a few of Wurtzel's fellow citizens might label her as downright un-American.

Disclosure: I say "folks", too.

Thanks to Cathy for the link.

15 comments:

  1. But that's because everyone here us sure they are going to be rich like him someday, too. Maybe tomorrow.

    That's the thing.

    I WANT to think that ANYONE could run in the Reddest-of-the-Red Congressional District, saying "If you make more than $250K, vote for the other guy. If you make less than that, vote for me, the Democrat."

    ...but all those less-than-$250K wage-slaves are just one lottery win and/or "other lucky break" away, right? From defending THEIR "earnings" from the elitists and welfare queens?

    Hypothesis: conservatism can be explained by certain neurological deficiencies or pathologies (esp., inordinate FEAR-RESPONSE). If that were true, would it make any difference? Even if we COULD "put something in the water" to treat it (the pathological fear, for example), who would do so? O_o

    Lord have mercy...

    ReplyDelete
  2. JCF, I think you're right that much of the turn to the right in the country has to do with fear. Change comes so rapidly today, that people want to put on the brakes and even go back to an earlier time. The Republicans play into the fears quite well. Of course, the worst of them are masters of deception, and they manage to fool a good many people into thinking the country will be better off with Republican governance.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I absolutely agree with that. And the pudding in which we find this proof is the "folks'" readiness to focus their vitriol on whatever bogeyman their leadership can produce, as far from the actual problem as he may be.

    Nobody on the right can explain how same-sex marriage actually "threatens" anything of theirs, but yet they're afraid of it. Now because it's finally becoming politically incorrect to call someone a fag on the floor of Congress, they are focusing on the illegal immigrants that are "taking away their jobs" as if they would line up to pick fruit for 12 hours a day.

    It worked in pre-WW2 Germany and we obviously haven't learn much because the same tactics work today.

    ReplyDelete
  4. " ...which, last I heard, was a newspaper in England:"

    Bad Girl. What did you do?

    Good article, though.

    ReplyDelete
  5. It seems that a good many of the members of the human race are either genetically programmed or taught to seek out an "other" to blame for the bad things that happen in their lives, whether the other is responsible or not. I'm of the opinion that their behavior is learned.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Bad Girl. What did you do?

    DP, I've lost count of the times I've been bad.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Your link to the Wurtzel article leads me only to a close-up of the illustration. I can't find her piece on the Guardian Website.

    The tea-party story isn't that the (expertly) misinformed and misdirected people turned out (fewer than reports made appear), but the big money that organized the events and slanted the coverage.

    Most people operate on information gleaned from their surroundings, not from research or study. The right-wing noise machine makes sure that what most people hear most is right-wing talking points. They're so ubiquitous that even Democrats speak in those terms, trying to counter them.

    The US is indeed in decline, with the supply of cheap energy declining; climate change threatening the food supply (and the existence of any city built on a desert), and the wreck of the financial establishment falling on the middle class. Easing the decline for the masses would be difficult at best. Too many people for the lifeboats. The helicopters are coming for the very rich. For the rest of us, grab something that floats (if available) and hope the water isn't too cold and the sharks not hungry.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Murdock, thanks. I had the wrong web address for the article. I believe the link is fixed now.

    And I left out the herd instinct, which can be very powerful.

    Unfortunately, things will have to get much worse before the misdirected and misinformed realize that they followed the wrong leaders, that they followed leaders who had only their own selfish interests at heart and didn't give a fig for the interests of any but the rich and the corporate class.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Here's an interview with the historian Lawrence Goodwyn that measures Obama against the records of Jefferson and Lincoln. He thinks the oligarchs have over reached, and Obama has room to respond. My question is, Whether the system will last long enough to be reformed.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Murdoch, in the interview, Goodwyn demonstrates a pessimism which is far beyond even my own. He is a historian and takes a calmer view of the long run, and he may be right. But don't forget that in the long run we are all dead. Political systems do tend to self-correct, but the correction may be a very long time in coming.

    ReplyDelete
  11. a good read. thanks for the link.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Dennis, I blush at such high praise from you.

    ReplyDelete
  13. It's the "American Dream," and why I don't think just allowing anyone who meets minor age and citizenship requirements to vote works! And, yes, I'm being absolutely serious. The vast majority are always going to be the "lowest common denominator" - lowest is the key word there. Lazy, stupid, selfish and greedy. So, allowing the "people" to decide is as good as saying "Hey! How about making laziness, stupidity, selfishness and greed our watchwords?!"

    Worse, capitalism adds a savage, animal element - you have a group of very wealthy, obscenely wealthy men, telling people with the discernment ability of a snail and the greed of Midas "I will make you rich, just like me, if you vote like I tell you and keep working at the wages I set. One day, I'll show you all my secrets and share out the wealth."

    This comes from people who believe the entire of human existence revolves around acquisition in a world that's a zero-sum game, and "the people" believe them. So, the American Dream is nothing but a dream, because it's how you keep the mindless animals working the mill.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Mark, what will be the criteria for excluding people from voting? Who will decide who is allowed to vote? You open up a huge can of worms when you talk about disenfranchising citizens, which will solve nothing. Do you seriously think that the power people will allow themselves and those whom they can dupe into voting as they do will permit themselves to be disenfranchised? Come on.

    ReplyDelete
  15. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete

Anonymous commenters, please sign a name, any name, to distinguish one anonymous commenter from another. Thank you.