Sunday, January 16, 2011

THE ROMAN CATHOLIC ORDINARIATE - "HISTORIC, BREATHTAKING"

The three former bishops, (from left) John Broadhurst, Keith Newton and Andrew Burnham, after the ceremony. Photograph: Dan Kitwood/Getty Images

From Peter Stanford at the Guardian:
In its 100-plus years Westminster Cathedral, the mother church of English Catholicism, will have seen few stranger sights than Saturday's procession of three Anglican bishops' wives, in matching beige coats, one with an outsized brown hat, going up on to the high altar to embrace their husbands, all newly ordained as Catholic priests. Catholicism isn't that keen on women on the altar – to the pain of the demonstrators from the Catholic Women's Ordination movement protesting outside the cathedral's doors – and it doesn't usually countenance priests having wives.

But this was no ordinary ceremony. Almost everyone who spoke during it used the word "historic" to describe the ordination as Catholic priests of John Broadhurst, Andrew Burnham and Keith Newton, all formerly Anglican bishops.

"...matching beige coats"? Coordinated before the ceremony as a proper color for Roman Catholic clergy wives?

I dunno. The reporter sounds breathless beyond what the event would warrant. The powers can pack the altar with 80 Roman Catholic priests and say, "Historic!" over and over, but, to me. the ordinariates seem much ado about not much. The stream of Anglicans flowing to Rome is nothing new. The stream that flows the other way, from Rome to Anglicanism, is nothing new either.

What is breathtaking about the whole initiative is the speed at which 550 years of post-Reformation practice is being overturned. Until two weeks ago Broadhurst, Burnham and Newton were still Anglican bishops. In the space of 14 days, they have completed a journey that usually takes other converts seven years: 12 months to go through the Rite of Christian Initiation of Adults to become a Catholic, and six years in a seminary.

So. The three bishops who, according to Rome, were never, ever bishops or even priests were ordained Roman Catholic priests with extraordinary speed. The former Bishop of Richborough, Keith Newton, who was chosen to be the first ordinary, comes right out of Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams' own diocese. Those years of faux ordinations and faux Eucharists must count for something to have put the "bishops" on the fast track to become RC priests.

I pray for and wish the members of the new Ordinariate of Our Lady of Walsingham well. I crossed over the other way myself, from Roman Catholicism to the Episcopal Church, and I appreciated the prayers and good wishes of my Roman Catholic friends when they were offered. May God bless them all.

UPDATE: The editorial in the Observer brings a different perspective to the story than the breathlessness of the reporter.
In the face of poverty, climate change, natural disasters and all the other challenges facing our planet for religious institutions to be consumed in bickering about whether women can be priests is the stuff of satire.

It is only institutional religion that continues to regard women as second-class citizens. If Catholicism believes that recruiting a handful of renegade Anglicans who share its institutional misogyny will buttress its position it is mistaken.
Read it all.

30 comments:

  1. Fourteen days. Wow. And I thought John Paul II was being fast-tracked! What kinda mojo do these guys have?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Bex, I hate to sound cynical, but it seems to me that the three men are showpieces, intended to attract more of the Anglican flock to the the ordinariate. Of course, I could be wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Mimi, I to crossed the Tiber the wrong way to the CofE.

    While any loss to a church is to be regretted, it is speculated that upto a further 30 Priests and about 30 groups or congregations will make the move.

    It is always to be regretted, but their existing parishes will continue with new incumbent priests and perhaps either with a reduced or even more enlightened congregation.

    It should be a wakeup call to the Church though - that to continue to dwell on gender and sexuality is detracting from the effort needed in Mission and alleviating the poverty and discrimination not only in the third world, but in our own country. And there is also the environment.

    Until we reconnect with our people in a big way - we will continue to be treated and regarded as something of the past, with no relevance in today's world.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I apologize in advance, UKViewer, don't mean to dwell on gender issues, but I can't resist wondering whether the new priests' wives will have to go through a year of RCIA.

    ReplyDelete
  5. UKViewer, I should add that at least one of my RC friends had sleepless nights over my departure and well let me know. I thought his reaction was rather disproportionate.

    I'm sad to see anyone leave the Episcopal Church or the Anglican Church, and you're very right that the churches must change, and not just the Church of England. The only churches I know of that are growing are the charismatic churches. Even the percentage of those choosing non-charismatic mega-churches is sliding. And there's a good bit of revolving-door activity in the mega-churches.

    It seems to me that one thing the unchurched need to see is more Christians not only preaching the Gospel but also living the Gospel in a manner that is visible to those who do not attend church.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Well, as my wife commented: "Fuck off in the name of the Lord and don't come back"

    ReplyDelete
  7. it seems to me that the three men are showpieces, intended to attract more of the Anglican flock to the the ordinariate

    My first thought on seeing the picture was "Ewwww!" They don't strike me as the types who would attract anyone to follow their example. I could be wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Back in the 1990s several Episcopal priests in Fort Worth went to Rome under JP2's "pastoral provision." Only one of them still has an Anglican Use parish. The rest (along with the laity who crossed over with them) were absorbed into the regular RC churches in the diocese, apparently because the bishop believed that this was a better use of resources given the shortage of priests and the relatively small number of formerly Anglican RC laity.

    I don't know about England, but I could easily see that happening to Ordiniate priests in the USA.

    ReplyDelete
  9. "Sir", please thank Mrs "Sir" for her eloquent contribution to the commentary, though next time she should not hold back but rather tell us what she really thinks.

    Cathy, there is that, but remember that the men are former - er - never-were bishops and had a certain cachet back in the day. I get really mixed up when I attempt to describe their former status.

    Paul, long-term, this plan may not work out quite as the Roman Anglo-Catholics (or whatever they plan to call themselves) expect. Eventually, I see them absorbed into RC parishes in England. In the future, the Anglo ordinands will need to be celibate, although I've heard that provision may be made for married candidates already in seminary.

    ReplyDelete
  10. "If Catholicism believes that recruiting a handful of renegade Anglicans who share its institutional misogyny will buttress its position it is mistaken."

    Amen to that.

    wv:patergame
    It sure is.

    ReplyDelete
  11. margaret, I know enough Latin that your WV suggests to me that there may be intelligence in operation, even intelligence accompanied by a sense of humor.

    ReplyDelete
  12. oh yes I know their "former status" may have an impact on some impressionable types :-) I'm going purely by how horrid the three of them look in the piccie.

    ReplyDelete
  13. They are going from biggish fish in a smallish pond to a mere splash of a fingerling in the ocean. The grinding weight of Roman Authority will be put on their shoulders, and none of this cagey "I wanted to become Catholic but couldn't afford it so I lived a lie" will be tolerated.

    I think that
    1) current RC priests and bishops will be annoyed
    2) they will never be viewed as trustworthy and
    3) they will slip beneath the waves sooner than later.

    As for shrinking churches, we just came back from our church's annual meeting. Growing, not only in ASA numbers, but in income, and that in hard times. The cynic in me thinks they should thank the RC for regressing because a not-insubstantial fraction of the growth is from ex-RCs like my wife.

    ReplyDelete
  14. IT, I believe you are right on all counts about the ordinariates, and the members will find out sooner than they'd like that Rome rules with a heavy hand.

    I'm pleased to hear that your church is growing. The RCs in my territory are much more loyal, but we have several members in our congregation who came over from the RCC.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Funny you should talk about growth, IT. We had our annual parish meeting after Mass today, heard the annual accounting, elected the next vestry class, and voted on our delegates to the diocesan convention. What we learned was that we had a net gain of parishioners and ended the year with a budget surplus. Our very inclusive, all-welcoming parish is growing, no small accomplishment in the current economic climate.

    When all of the Bishops who want to steal the silver and go south talk about the Episcopal Church losing members, I never cease to be amazed. Our parish is growing, our diocese, too. I always think that if theirs is not, perhaps they should not be so exclusive (thinking of our church as an upper crust men’s club) and should start being more inclusive, as was our Lord and Savior. They might be surprised at the increase in their numbers.

    ReplyDelete
  16. We are not growing, and our budget is in deficit, but we have an uphill battle here, as the Roman Catholic Church is so much a part of the culture that to leave is a major break from family and friends, and extended families are quite close around here.

    I know of a good many Roman Catholics who have stopped going to church, but they generally don't attend the church of another denomination. They stay away altogether.

    ReplyDelete
  17. One of the big problems facing the Roman Catholic Church in the Dallas-Fort Worth area is a shortage of priests. It's not unusual for parishes with one priest to have well over a thousand communicants. As a result, just celebrating enough masses to allow the faithful to communicate each Sunday has become a full-time job, and there's little opportunity for the priest to develop a one-on-one relationship with the parishioners. I believe that's why the local RC bishops haven't been to enthusiastic about letting former Episcopal priests serve "Anglican Use" parishes with maybe 200 communicants with regular RC parishes going shorthanded (not to mention the possible resentment from the RC priests who came in through the normal channels).

    Given the ultra-conservative outlook of many of the former Episcopal priests in this area, it may not be surprising that one of them is the pastor of the only RC parish in the Roman Catholic Diocese of Fort Worth that has a Sunday mass in Latin.

    I also suspect that most of the clergy around here (both EC and SC) that were inclined to cross the Tiber have already done so, so it may not be that big a deal here.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Paul, with such a shortage of priests, why wouldn't the RC bishops want the crossover priests to join the regular pool? Of course, there will be resentments if they don't. What's the benefit to the RCC of the Anglo-Roman enclaves anyway? The gain seems one-sided to me, all on the side of the Anglo-Roman Catholics.

    What do they call themselves?

    ReplyDelete
  19. Mimi, I completely sympathize with the attitude of the RC bishops. I apologize if I gave the wrong impression. It's a question of good stewardship of a limited resource. The one "Anglican Use" parish in the Catholic Diocese of Fort Worth is an exceptional case. Its pastor was previously the rector when it was an Episcopal Church. Almost the entire parish crossed the Tiber with him, and Bishop Pope and the Standing Committee let them take the property with them (I don't remember whether they paid anything to the Episcopal Diocese or not). The pastor is now in his 70s. It will be interesting to see what happens when he's no longer there. Will the Bishop allow them to continue as an "Anglican Use" parish, or will they be absorbed into the mainstream diocese? Time will tell.

    ReplyDelete
  20. It should be a wakeup call to the Church though - that to continue to dwell on gender and sexuality is detracting from the effort needed in Mission and alleviating the poverty and discrimination not only in the third world, but in our own country. And there is also the environment.

    Hear, hear!

    ReplyDelete
  21. 12 months to go through the Rite of Christian Initiation of Adults to become a Catholic

    Perhaps things have changed over the years, or perhaps in the UK they take things more slowly--but when I joined the RC Church back in '81, the process took about four months, including the three weeks I was away for Christmas break (I was in school at the time), and the two weeks it took the bishop to sign the paperwork allowing my catechizing priest to perform the sacrament of confirmation in place of the bishop. And I didn't join as a potential priest or whatever--just an unbaptized layman who walked in off the street, more or less.

    I must admit the Rite of Initiation into the EC which I underwent about half a year after that was speediest of all.
    Fr. Dooley:
    "Hi, come up and take communion, won't you?"
    Me:
    "Oh, thank you, it's okay if I do?"
    Fr. Dooley:
    "Why wouldn't it be okay!"

    Given how short my actual time in the RC was, perhaps saying I crossed the Tiber is overstating it. It was more of a jump from one side to the other.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Paul Powers, I didn't at all take it that we were speaking in opposition to each other. I think the Anglican whatevers will last no more than a generation, if that long.

    JCF, agreed. Hear, hear!

    Kishnevi, where were you before you joined the RCC?

    ReplyDelete
  23. I know of a good many Roman Catholics who have stopped going to church, but they generally don't attend the church of another denomination. They stay away altogether.

    The biggest denom in the USA: the RCC.

    The second biggest denom: Ex-RCC.

    I wish more ex-RCs would discover TEC (that is, the one's who remain creedally Christian in some sense, but who just couldn't take the RCC any longer). I feel like they could process a lot of their hurt, through membership in TEC (though of course, that's up to them).

    ReplyDelete
  24. JCF, TEC hides its light under the bushel. BP still hangs out with her RC choir friends and they have no clue about what Episcopalians are.

    No, Rowan is not a Pope. Yes, you can still believe in trans-substantiation. It's not RC-lite. And your brain, please put it in gear-you'll need it. We've taken several to services with us and continue to plot field trips.

    BP laughs because I was on a plane a while back with an unhappy RC and told him he should come to our church. I deserve several toasters, I am one of your best evangelists. ;-)

    SEriously, though, there is a very nice TEC parish church near BP's former RC church and hardly anyone knows about it. how do you bring people in with out standig out there with sandwich boards?

    ReplyDelete
  25. Well, at least not the Phelps' way of sandwich boards anyway! [Life magazine did an interesting photojournalism peace on Phelps & WBC, inc. their demo at the Pope's last trip to the US in '08. I'm tempted to say they deserve each other . . . but I'm not even sure Papa-Ratzi deserves Phelps, and THAT is saying something!]

    Well there's ONE way I hope TEC doesn't "hide its light under a bushel", IT: prayer. ;-/

    ReplyDelete
  26. "It will be interesting to see what happens when he's no longer there." Hope they don't think they'll be able to call their own pastor...

    ReplyDelete
  27. In response to my posting at Thinking Anglicans re Simon Peter's mother-in-law, "Nom-de-Plume" responded "Clearly, the mention of St Peter's mother-in-law does not prove that he was married. Maybe he was in a Civil Partnership. :-)".

    The appropriate response, which I doubt will pass muster at TA, is LMFAO.

    ReplyDelete
  28. I wish more ex-RCs would discover TEC (that is, the one's who remain creedally Christian in some sense, but who just couldn't take the RCC any longer)

    JCF, me too.

    TEC hides its light under the bushel. BP still hangs out with her RC choir friends and they have no clue about what Episcopalians are.

    IT, too true, and I'm not sure how to go about showing our light.

    May I say that for an atheist, you make a damned good evangelist for TEC?

    Hope they don't think they'll be able to call their own pastor...

    Bex, indeed! Ain't gonna happen.

    Lapin, very likely such a commentary would not pass muster at TA.

    ReplyDelete
  29. I find that many ex-RCC - saving Mimi's presence, of course - seem to have almost an ex-cult-member mentality. They have been so indoctrinated that, if not RCC, then no C - all the moorings of faith are torn loose, and the idea of going anywhere else is pointless. They didn't leave "a" church, but "The" Church - they were taught so thoroughly that no other church is real.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Well, I'm not the only one, Mark. There are a few others. :-)

    ReplyDelete

Anonymous commenters, please sign a name, any name, to distinguish one anonymous commenter from another. Thank you.