The old ways of ensuring alliances are passing. The old certainties of known allegiances and predetermined interest groups is giving way to the power of like-minded people connecting and assembling in one place, for an agreed end, in the flash of a few tweets. When everyone in the world has a mobile phone with video cameras, are television studios needed to report news?
....
The very looseness of the Anglican Communion (at least until the Tedious Years of the Anglican Covenant Discussion) is what will give it strength to move with relative ease in this new world. The gentle, unlegislated bonds of affection and the tolerance for variances of custom, behaviour, churchmanship, hymns, divorce, prayer books and the like are far more aligned with the way we live now. The old-speak of the proposed Covenant hearkens back to a world that is passing away, one of rigidity, structure, and complex mechanisms of governance.
It's tiresome enough that we've been considering a Covenant when there is so much about the very concept that flies in the face of all that's been characterised as Anglican. That it could be adopted is, to our mind, one that will signal the death knell of the Anglican Communion as we have known it. (And frankly we don't want to know any other kind.)
Ouch! But oh so true. How we will miss the "gentle, unlegislated bonds of affection..." if the covenant is adopted. The thought brings a tear to my eye. (True. Not snark. I actually teared up.)
The writers remind us of the Lambeth Quadrilateral:
Since the late 19th century, the Lambeth Quadrilateral has served brilliantly as a strong and supple web of connection for us all. In our opinion, it's all that is needed.
Here it is, all 108 words of it (five tweets).(a) The Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments, as 'containing all things necessary to salvation,' and as being the rule and ultimate standard of faith.
(b) The Apostles' Creed, as the Baptismal Symbol; and the Nicene Creed, as the sufficient statement of the Christian faith.
(c) The two Sacraments ordained by Christ Himself — Baptism and the Supper of the Lord — ministered with unfailing use of Christ's words of Institution, and of the elements ordained by Him.
(d) The Historic Episcopate, locally adapted in the methods of its administration to the varying needs of the nations and peoples called of God into the Unity of His Church.
And why does the Lambeth Quadrilateral not now serve our needs? Why do we need a covenant? The answer is we do not.
The entire article is brilliant, and I urge you to read it all.
The members of the editorial staff of Anglicans Online may be found here.
That "five tweets" analogy is Made of So Much WIN! :-D
ReplyDeleteJCF, exactly. Five tweets.
ReplyDeleteWhy doesn't everyone see the daft covenant for what it is? If the covenant is adopted, it will be the albatross around the neck of the Anglican Communion.