Sunday, February 13, 2011

THE FAITH...ENTRUSTED TO THE SAINTS

Caravaggio - "Supper at Emmaus"

In the present Anglican disagreements, we hear much talk of the leadership of the Episcopal Church having left "the faith that was once for all entrusted to the saints." Because of what seems to me the unthinking overuse of the phrase and one other phrase, the accusation that the Episcopal Church has "torn the fabric of the Anglican Communion", my reaction to hearing the words is pretty similar to my reaction to the sound of scratches on a chalkboard.

The former phrase, which is my present concern, is from Jude 1:3:
Beloved, while eagerly preparing to write to you about the salvation we share, I find it necessary to write and appeal to you to contend for the faith that was once for all entrusted to the saints.
I've just begun to read Diarmaid MacCullough's Christianity: The First Three Thousand Years. On page 10 of the introduction to the book, are the following words:
The passions which have gone into the construction of a world faith are if nothing else the catalyst for enormous human creativity in literature, music, architecture and art. To seek an understanding of Christianity is to see Jesus Christ in the mosaics and icons of Byzantium, or in the harshly lit features of the man on the road to Emmaus, as Caravaggio painted him. Looking up at the heavily gilt ceiling of Santa Maria Maggiore in Rome, one should realize that all its gold was melted down from temples across the Atlantic Ocean, sent as a tribute to the Christian God and to the Catholic Church by the king of Spain, the theft accompanied or justified by the frequent misuse of the name of Christ. The sound of Christian passion is heard in the hymns of John and Charles Wesley, bringing pride, self confidence and divine purpose to the lives of poor and humble people struggling to make sense of a new industrial society in Georgian Britain. It shapes the divine abstractions of the organ music of Johann Sebastian Bach. During the drab and mendacious tyranny of the German Democratic Republic, a Bach organ recital could pack out a church with people seeking something which spoke to them of objectivity, integrity and serene authenticity. All manifestations of Christian consciousness need to be taken seriously; from a craving to understand the ultimate purpose of God, which has produced terrifying visions of the Last Days, to the instinct to comfortable socialbility, which has led to cricket on the Anglican vicarage lawn.
Santa Maria Maggiore, Rome - Gilt ceiling

So then with reference to "the faith...entrusted to the saints", was there a cut-off date when the faith was "once for all" established as given? Surely, the first century was not the end of revealed faith. Was it the second century? The third? The Council of Nicea? A later council? Was the Reformation all a mistake? A departure from the "faith...entrusted to the saints"?

With all the variety in Christianity over the centuries, who is in, and who is out? I'm asking questions only, not answering the questions. Do we see Jesus in the Caravaggio painting? Do we see Jesus in the glorious gilt ceiling in Santa Maria Maggiore, tainted though it is by the history that made its beauty possible? My queries are sparked by the words in the quote above, which seem to me very right. There's room in the Church, the Body of Christ, for great diversity, and it appears to me that we humans are the ones who confine the faith, who set boundaries which are perhaps not of God.

And what of the continuing work of the Holy Spirit in the Church and individuals?
‘I still have many things to say to you, but you cannot bear them now. When the Spirit of truth comes, he will guide you into all the truth; for he will not speak on his own, but will speak whatever he hears, and he will declare to you the things that are to come. He will glorify me, because he will take what is mine and declare it to you. All that the Father has is mine. For this reason I said that he will take what is mine and declare it to you. (John 16:12-15)
Who discerns which movement or work is of the Spirit? Testing the fruits over a period of time by a broad swath of the Christian community would seem to me a likely way to move forward to consensus if we do not wish to quench the Spirit. Enlarge the circle.

17 comments:

  1. At the risk of being pedantic, I feel I should come to the rescue of Jacopo Torriti, whose mosaic of the Coronation of the Virgin you have reproduced above. I think the gilded ceiling of Santa Maria Maggiore in Rome that McCullough has in mind is this one:

    http://rpmedia.ask.com/ts?u=/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f8/Ceiling_SM_Maggiore.jpg/120px-Ceiling_SM_Maggiore.jpg

    What you have reproduced is the magnificent 13th century mosaic in the apse by Jacopo Torriti who never knew about the Americas or their gold.

    ReplyDelete
  2. About your post, I agree whole-heartedly. I don't think the Holy Spirit ever stopped working.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Counterlight, I knew something about the picture wasn't right, but I went ahead. Thanks for the correction. I changed the picture. Don't ever hesitate to tell me when I have something wrong. I am truly grateful when readers correct misinformation, especially experts like you.

    ReplyDelete
  4. When Jude was written—there is ongoing controversy about who was the author and when he wrote—Christianity was quite diverse. It is not clear to which “faith” the book refers. In any case, much of what we now considers essentials of the fait were later developments. Many would consider the faith of Jude’s time to be much impoverished. On the other hand, perhaps modern Christians have added rather too much to the deposit of Christian essentials.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Lionel, it makes no sense that the phrase, which is without real pertinence in the present day, continues to be repeated as an accusation time and time again.

    ReplyDelete
  6. From our Hymnal 1982 #629, comes a text from 1835, which the "orthodox" would also probably deem revisionist.

    We limit not the truth of God
    To our poor reach of mind,
    By notions of our day and sect,
    Crude, partial, and confined.
    No, let a new and better hope
    Within our hearts be stirred:
    For God has yet more light and truth
    To break forth from the Word.

    George Rawson, 1835

    ReplyDelete
  7. Ah C.W.S, thank you for the wonderful words from the hymn. I love them, although they were written by a dastardly revisionist way back in 1835.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Mimi,
    I am tired of the schismatics who would blame change on us simply because we choose to hear the Spirit move.

    I do love the hymn too. What is the tune?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Muthah+, I'm tired of it, too - scratches on a chalkboard.

    The tune to the hymn can be found here.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I'm beginning this book too. This and Tickle's Emerging Church.

    Much to ponder.

    You inspire me, Grandmere. Constantly.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Gracie Allen is reported to have said, "Never place a period where God has put a comma."

    Gracie said it. I believe it. That settles it.

    Thanks, Mimi. What a great post.

    ReplyDelete
  12. margaret and Elizabeth, thank you for the kind words.

    McCulloch writes beautifully. I read his The Reformation and enjoyed it immensely.

    Gracie is right; Gracie is always right. Sometimes it is all so depressing.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I really liked the book too. My review was "glowing" in the view of at least one other blogger. I suppose I can accept that. ;-) I think you will continue to enjoy it.

    On your post well said. This is one of two horribly mauled (in my view) Biblical passages that the "orthodox" have been mistreating. The other is the OT quote "How shall two men walk together unless they agree." That one is taken out of context to say the least.

    FWIW
    jimB

    ReplyDelete
  14. "Who discerns which movement or work is of the Spirit? Testing the fruits over a period of time by a broad swath of the Christian community would seem to me a likely way to move forward to consensus if we do not wish to quench the Spirit."

    Paul gives us a good starting point in Galatians: "the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, generosity, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control." Where such fruit is abundantly evident there is a good chance that the Spirit is involved. Where such fruit is sparse it is difficult to discern the working of the Spirit.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Jim, thanks for the link to your post on MacCullough's tome. It's heavy, literally, with 1016 pages of text, not counting notes and index. I expect that if I ever "review" the book, my words will glow. The author wears his erudition lightly and writes with such clarity that his passages flow easily along.

    The "orthodox" use the passage you mention as their excuse for "walking apart". The same old, same old bits and bites of Scripture taken out of context are wearying.

    Bill, thank you, thank you for the list of the fruits of the Spirit. We can never be too often reminded of them.

    ReplyDelete
  16. A noteable reflection Grandmere for which I thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  17. theme, I thank you for your kind words.

    ReplyDelete

Anonymous commenters, please sign a name, any name, to distinguish one anonymous commenter from another. Thank you.