President Barack Obama’s decision to authorize lethal aid to Syrian rebels marks a deepening of U.S. involvement in the two-year civil war. But U.S. officials are still grappling with what type and how much weaponry to send the opposition forces and how to ensure it stays out of the hands of extremists battling for control of Syria.Sending lethal weapons to rebels in an already violent country will not help end the civil war in Syria. Not everyone agrees with the decision to arm the rebels nor with the assessment by the White House on the use of chemical weapons by the Assad regime. I'm getting flashbacks to the pre-Iraq war period. Why do we persist in thinking that our weapons and military interventions will benefit the people in the countries in the Middle East? Look at Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan post-intervention by the US? Can we claim success in even one of the countries?
U.S. officials confirmed Obama’s authorization Thursday after the White House announced it had conclusive evidence that Syrian President Bashar Assad’s regime used chemical weapons against opposition forces. Obama has said the use of chemical weapons would cross a “red line,” suggesting greater American intervention.
The rebels don't even want our light weapons.
Initial consignments are expected to consist of small arms and ammunition, which the rebel Free Syrian Army said on Friday would be largely “meaningless.” The Syrian Opposition Coalition called for “strategic and decisive” support.I'd hoped Obama would resist the pressure to intervene in Syria with military aid. No good will come of this. When will the citizens of the US have a say in our military interventions abroad?
UPDATE: This morning, I wrote to President Obama of my sadness that he had decided to send weapons to Syria and requested a reply. This afternoon, I received a reply which included the following:
Dear June:Thank you for writing. I have heard from many Americans about issues affecting seniors. Today’s economic climate further intensifies the unique challenges they face, and I appreciate your perspective.
My Administration continues to support older Americans encountering unfair treatment, financial hardship, or difficulty obtaining health care. The historic Affordable Care Act strengthens Medicare by not only preserving but also expanding benefits for Americans who depend on Medicare every day. The law has helped more than five million seniors and people with disabilities save an average of over $600 on prescription drugs in the “donut hole” in Medicare coverage. Additionally, in 2011, more than 32 million seniors received 1 or more free preventive services, including the new Annual Wellness Visit. To learn about help available through the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, visit www.CMS.gov.
....
Thank you, again, for being in touch.
Sincerely,
Barack Obama
Blah, blah, blah, with nothing about the subject of my message. Is this the best the White House staff can do? Better no reply, n'est-ce pas?
UPDATE 2: You may want to check Andrew Sullivan's post on sending arms to the Syrian rebels.
"When will the citizens of the US have a say in our military interventions abroad?"
ReplyDelete--well, at least we elected Obama and not McCain--who is frothing at the mouth for war there.
You're right, margaret. McCain would have had us in Syria some time ago.
DeleteWe don't even know very much about the various Syrian rebel groups we are set to arm. Al Qaeda is said to be part of the mix. How many times now have we had weapons we supplied used against our own military?
Yes, about McCain, and if what he did when he went there is any indication, he would give the weapons to recognized terrorists(known to everyone but him).
ReplyDeleteAlas, I'm getting weary of saying (and thinking), "Of course, Obama is better than ______," even if he is.
DeleteThat response from the White House is a bizarre non-sequitur. I presume you must have indicated your age in some way when you wrote; I wonder what they would have written if you had told them you were 25?
ReplyDeleteAndrew Sullivan is scathing about what he calls Obama's betrayal on Syria: http://dish.andrewsullivan.com/2013/06/13/obamas-betrayal-on-syria/
I don't know enough about Syria to evaluate this properly, and frankly I don't care about Syria. It's very, very sad that so many people are being slaughtered - but we just got out of two wars over there after much slaughter and expense. Why do our leaders keep wanting to entangle us in other people's fights? Does it ever - ever - do any real good long term? Cf. Vietnam and many others.
Russ, the White House has access to a lot more information about me besides my age. Apparently, no one bothers to read email to the WH before the response is sent. I wonder if Obama knows or cares about what is being done in his name.
DeleteNow I'll go read Andrew Sullivan.