Showing posts with label Anglican Ordinariate. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Anglican Ordinariate. Show all posts

Saturday, January 1, 2011

AND SO IT BEGINS...

From Ruth Gledhill in the London Sunday Times, which you cannot read online without a supscription:

Priests and worshippers from to 20 Church of England parishes are to convert to Catholicism under a new scheme that allows Anglican opponents of women bishops to defect to Rome.

The founding members of the new Anglican Ordinariate, who include three former Church of England bishops, two of their wives and three Anglican nuns, will today be received into the Catholic Church in a low-key ceremony at midday Mass at Westminster Cathedral. The bishops are due to be ordained as Catholic priests in two weeks.
....

John Broadhurst, former Bishop of Fulham - whose resignation from the Church of England took effect at midnight last night and who is among those being received - told The Times: "This could herald a real transformation of the religious scene and be an aid to the conversion of England." (My emphasis)

Besides Father Broadhurst, the others being recieved today are Andrew Burnham, former Bishop of Ebbsfleet and Keith Newton, former Bishop of Matabeleland who retired to England in 2005, Edwin Barnes, former Bishop of Richborough and David Silk, former Bishop of Ballarat in Australia.

Not simply low-key, but nearly under the radar unless you're paying attention, which Ruth Gledhill always does. So the "stampede" out of the Church of England begins.

Anglican opponents to women bishops did not need a special scheme to defect to Rome. They were always free to do so. And "Father Broadhurst" won't be "Father" for two weeks, because as of the stroke of midnight, he was, and still is, a layman.

Some might say layman Broadhurst's commentary, the words in bold print, on what the reception will mean to all-England is a tad over-hyped, and I might be one who would say just that - "an aid to the conversion of England"? Really?

From America Magazine:

The 1230 Mass today at London's Westminster Cathedral looked like any other. But for the hint in the booklet for the feast of Mary, Mother of God, that after the homily would be a "Rite of reception and confirmation", there was nothing at all to indicate the significance of what was to happen. The celebrant, an auxiliary bishop of Westminster, Alan Hopes, said nothing at the start of Mass, and it wasn't until the end of a lengthy homily on Mary as Theotokos, or God-bearer, and the controversies of the fourth-century Council of Nicea which led to this Feast, that Bishop Hopes mentioned that they would be receiving some former members of the Church of England into full communion.

They included, he said, three former bishops and their relatives, as well as three Anglican nuns.

It would have been hard, if you had just dropped into the Cathedral for Mass, to understand the significance of what was happening.There was nobody around to explain that these are the founding members of the world's first Ordinariate, the scheme created by Pope Benedict to allow for the corporate reception of Anglicans.

Is there not a touch of irony in that the anti-women bishops bishops and nuns were received into the Roman Catholic Church on the feast of Mary, Mother of God? What would Mary say?

H/T to Jim Simons at Three Rivers Episcopal for the link to the article in America, and thanks to Ann V. for calling the post at "Three Rivers" to my attention.