Showing posts with label reelection. Show all posts
Showing posts with label reelection. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 25, 2014

TRICKSTERS AND DECEIVERS


"Americans for Prosperity", the well-funded conservative group that has been attacking Democrats in battleground states over the health care reform law, put out TV ads Monday against Sens. Mary Landrieu (D-LA) and Mark Udall (D-CO).

"But what's notable about the ads is what they aren't: A personalized story of someone who's been negatively affected by Obamacare, the kind of verifiable set of facts that can be checked -- and rebutted, as happened with a recent AFP ad that led to significant backlash from the fact-checking community."
Watch the ad. I've seen it more times than I can count. The new tactic for anti-Democratic campaign ads by AFP (think Koch brothers) is to include no facts that can be checked. When I saw the video for the first time, I was caught off guard until the very end, when the woman instructs viewers to call Sen. Mary Landrieu's office to tell her about the horrors of Obamacare. My counter-suggestion to people in Louisiana is to call Landrieu's office and tell her you approve of Obamacare as a stopgap until we adopt a single-payer health plan for the entire country.

The amount of money being spent by the Koch brothers and their ilk is incredible this early in the election game. I hope viewers will become bored and weary of the ads and tune out.

Saturday, November 10, 2012

REALITY CHECK FOR WALL STREET

The reason for the big stock sell-off on the two days after the election, according to what I hear and read from a good many people, is simple.  I say reason because there's only one reason for the catastrophic drop in the Dow - despair over the reelection of President Obama for another four years, which will be the end of the world as we know it.

I know little about the stock market, but investing in stocks seems pretty much of a crap shoot, since it appears that a good many, but surely not all, investors buy and sell on the basis of emotions, which run the gamut from euphoria to panic, and a soupçon of research.  I am told by experts that, in the long run, investments in stocks produce the best results, but that one should have a balanced portfolio, because as some investments go up, others go down, i.e. stocks versus bonds.   That's in the long run.  And yes, it's true that in the long run, we are all dead, and we can't take it with us.

By temperament I am not a risk-taker, but it seems to me that during a sell-off is the time to buy stocks at bargain prices.  It's knowing when the bottom is near that's sticky.  Just when do you jump in?  I tend not to follow the herd, buying when everyone is buying, and selling when everyone is selling.  I'd do the opposite.  Anyway, Grandpère does most of the investing under the guidance of a trusted friend and what he reads around and about, but before he makes changes, he usually discusses them with me, and I give him my sage advice which he follows sometimes and other times not.  But I digress.

An article by Michael Santoli from yesterday made a great deal of sense to me.  Investors who headed for the fainting couch during the precipitous drop may wish to read...or not.  The article is reality-based, so Republicans may not be interested.
Like anything complicated, a dramatic market move is inevitably driven by things we know, things we don't, and things we know that just aren't so. The past two days' 3.5% stock sell-off has had an unusual volume of sloganeered causes pinned to it, making it all the more important to figure out where the obvious factors deviate from the valid ones.
What else besides the reelection of the president might have been at play in the sell-off?
The election
President Obama's re-election was a close enough call as of Tuesday morning that a significant number of investors clearly set up a tactical bet on a Romney win.
Yes, get that one out of the way.
The fiscal cliff
This impending expiration of some $600 billion worth of annual tax cuts and spending measures, arriving Jan. 1 unless Congress acts, has gone from obscure preoccupation of economists and Washington wonks to a full-blown public obsession in about 72 hours.
If you read nothing else at the link, please read the section on the fiscal cliff.
Europe
The resurfacing of concerns about the European economy and the progress of the Greek bailout and general sovereign-debt firewall there might be the one factor not getting enough credit for the market queasiness.
I've heard and read that the European economic troubles have nothing to do with the drop in the Dow, but I don't believe it, and neither does Santoli.
Market technical clues
Stocks were showing waning momentum well before the bleating about taxes and cliffs got loud this week. Yesterday the Standard & Poor's 500 sagged below its 200-day moving average, which many market handicappers believe means the market's prevailing trend is no longer up.
If the president is to be blamed, I'd like to see the buck stop with him because of what he's actually done besides get reelected, not because of mistaken perceptions - that he is a socialist (which is laughable), or because he's black (yes, racism is in the air), or because the majority of people in the United States had the temerity to reelect him to office against the wishes of a vocal and angry minority.  I'm not above faulting the president for his policies and actions over the last four years, for I have done so more than once, but I'm thoroughly sick and tired of him being blamed for all the wrong reasons, especially by those who do not and will not consider truths and facts that do not fit into the fantasy world they have created for themselves.  Witness their shock and disbelief  that Obama was reelected in the face of late polls that showed him ahead.

Image from Wikipedia Commons.

Wednesday, November 7, 2012

QUICK THOUGHT AFTER THE ELECTION

 
Perhaps it might be helpful if we moved away from lamenting that the people of the country are so very divided and rather began to speak of people having different opinions about various issues, which has been the case since the founding of the republic. Yes, feelings run high after the election, but Obama strikes the right notes when he speaks in hope of people coming together, which he did last night and repeats fairly often.
I believe we can seize this future together because we are not as divided as our politics suggests. We’re not as cynical as the pundits believe. We are greater than the sum of our individual ambitions, and we remain more than a collection of red states and blue states. We are and forever will be the United States of America.
Some thought the acceptance speech too long, but I thought it was just right.  The president said what needed to be said, no more, no less.

Update from The Book of Common Prayer:
Help us, O Lord, to finish the good work here begun.
Strengthen our efforts to blot out ignorance and prejudice,
and to abolish poverty and crime. And hasten the day when
all our people, with many voices in one united chorus, will
glorify your holy Name. Amen.
Thanks to Mark in the comments.