On Wednesday evening, I watched
The Charlie Rose Show, which featured as guests John Burns and Dexter Filkins of
The New York Times. Both spent years in Iraq reporting on the present war.
I wanted to get their perspective on the present situation in Iraq and to hear what they thought of Gen. Petraeus' testimony before Congress. I watched with growing dismay as they seemed to agree with the general's opinion that real progress was being made and that we should tough it out in Iraq to give the Iraqis more time to sort things out among themselves. They see progress as coming from the bottom up rather than the top down. I agree that if the violence is to cease in Iraq, it is the Iraqi people themselves who will need to do much of the work. We part ways in that I don't see the necessity of the US keeping large numbers of troops in Iraq for the foreseeable future. It seemed to me that the two basically agree with Petraeus.
What totally freaked me out is that not one of the three mentioned the troops who will have to do the hard and dangerous work of keeping the violence down, while the Iraqis work out their differences. It's as though they are chess pieces to be moved about the game board and not real human beings in harm's way, many of whom are worn out from repeated deployments and are working with equipment that is defective and worn out.
Petraeus is, in my opinion, the most honest general that we've had in charge in Iraq, because he comes closer to speaking the truth in describing the situation there than any of the others. He doesn't try to put lipstick on a pig.
Filkins was somewhat more realistic than Burns in that he described the downturn in violence as fragile and allowed that it may not hold and could turn explosive again at any time. I found this statement by Burns rather astonishing:
JOHN BURNS: And the notion I get, as you would expect of Americans who are, in my experience, very pragmatic and open-minded people, is that there`s a convergence on one idea. And that is that the way home, if there`s a way home -- and this has got to be incremental -- that we can`t now -- given all the complexities and uncertainties, it would be unwise to set -- to put ourselves into lockstep to draw up some overall solution. That, push forward, see where you are, make a decision at that point. It`s the way every football coach that I`ve ever watched plays his football games.Arrrgh! This is not football! What he says about the American people is far from the truth. The great majority want our part in the war to come to an end.
A little background here. At the end of and in the aftermath of the Battle of Fallujah, Dexter Filkins and I exchanged emails for a brief period. He seemed a little pleased to have a granny from the bayou country send him emails and not tear into him with scathing criticism. Whatever I thought of the idea of destroying Fallujah to save it from the insurgents, I was not going to tear into the messenger from the scene about it. He did excellent battlefield reporting from his position embedded with the troops, and that's what I wrote to tell him. To me, the idea of leveling a city to save it seemed pure madness, but I did not tell him that, since he was still in a very dangerous situation. After a while, I stopped writing to him, since my thoughts on the war were quite gloomy, and I thought he had enough to contend with and did not need to hear my bitching and moaning.
At the website of the
Charlie Rose Show, where you can see the video at the link above, I had left a comment. Afterwards, I checked to see if I still had Filkins email address, and I did. I was not sure that it was still a working address, but I sent him the following:
Dexter, I listened respectfully to you and John Burns in your interview with Charlie Rose. The violence in Iraq is down but may be creeping up again. I agree that the change will need to come from the bottom up, when the Iraqis have had enough. It seems that you and John support Gen. Petraeus's position.
I believe that Petraeus is the most honest general we have had leading the military effort in Iraq. I have a sticker on my car that says, " BRING THEM HOME", and I mean that, but I hope that we bring our troops home in a responsible way. I hope that we offer protection to the Iraqis who have worked for us and who will be in danger when we leave. I hope that we do not abandon support for the country once we leave. We owe the Iraqis a great deal for destroying so much of their country, for causing the displacement of so many of their citizens, and, directly or indirectly, causing the deaths of many of their citizens.
You and John were in Iraq, and I was not. That's why I listened respectfully to your words. As I wrote in the online commentary on the show:
Comment by Grandmère Mimi on Thursday, Apr 10 at 01:11 PM
I didn't hear either man mention the abuse and lack of support of the US troops in Iraq by their superiors. I didn't hear them mention that our warriors are worn out, that their equipment is worn out, that our Army and National Guard are being destroyed. I did not hear them mention that the present level of troop numbers are unsustainable. What I hear from Petraeus is give us another year, or two, or three, or however long we need. I'm hearing echoes of the pleadings in the midst of that other not-so-distant, but not-to-be-named war. I hear these two men supporting Petraeus. Sorry, I'm not buying it.
I'm sorry that you and John chose not to address the matter of effects of the war on our military, because I think that is a vital issue.
Regards,
June Butler aka Grandmere MimiFilkins answered promptly and politely. I do not post or quote emails without permission, but I will try to paraphrase his response. He thanked me and admitted that he should have mentioned the strain on the troops, because it is a vital issue. He said that he wished to, but that he did not have the opportunity. He said that it was not so much that he supported Petraeus, but that he was trying to convey that the situation in Iraq was quite complex, and if he had the chance to do the interview again, he would talk about the troops, because the numbers serving now in Iraq cannot continue.
Fair enough. Still, that the three men could spend nearly an hour talking about Iraq and what should be done there without ever mentioning the troops is, to me, absolutely astonishing. I confess that I was depressed for two whole days after watching the interview.
Somewhat off topic, but I wanted to include a couple of quotes from the interview about the day Saddam fell:
CHARLIE ROSE: Now, this is anniversary today...
DEXTER FILKINS: The fall of Saddam.
CHARLIE ROSE: The fall of Saddam.
DEXTER FILKINS: Yes. Yes, when the statue came down. In fact...
CHARLIE ROSE: Which is often -- it`s a visible sense that...
DEXTER FILKINS: Yes. Yes. I mean, it was remarkable.
You know, I was outside the city that morning. You know, we slept in a palm grove. And, you know, waiting -- I don`t know -- John was in the middle of the city. I mean, speaking of crazy, I mean, he survived the whole bombardment.
And the Marines that I was with were kind of gearing up for a big fight. And, of course, you know, by 8:00 a.m. in the morning, it was clear there was no Iraqi army to speak of.
And then, of course, by 10:30 in the morning, the whole city was being looted. And, you know, by noon, the ministries were on fire.
Yes, what a day. I mean, it was -- I felt like, you know, I was on a football team and there were four minutes to go in the game and we were ahead by 40 to nothing, and we somehow found a way to lose.
(CROSSTALK)
DEXTER FILKINS: You could feel that day all the wind go out of it. It really -- just...
CHARLIE ROSE: Because of the chaos that was apparent and no one was in charge. And when you look back...
....
DEXTER FILKINS: ...I don`t know if they had 165,000 troops, but there was -- that day, April 9th, I ended up at -- you know, I don`t know, 2:00 p.m. I was in front of the Iraqi Olympic Committee office, which was -- John knows was run by Saddam -- one of Saddam Hussein`s notorious sons, Uday. I mean, he tortured people there, he executed people there.
But -- and it was a scene of great looting by 2:00 p.m. The Iraqis had just descended on it and they were tearing it to pieces.
They were leading out these beautiful Arabian horses, these stallions that were, you know, immaculate, racehorses carrying them out -- a big party. Right next to it was a platoon of American Marines just watching, and watching the whole sort of...
CHARLIE ROSE: Because somebody has given them the order to stand down.
DEXTER FILKINS: Well, I went over to the lieutenant, you know, who is in charge of maybe 40 guys. You know, he`s probably 22 years old. And I said, "Are you just going to let this happen?" By this time the whole city is on fire.
And he said, "I don`t have any orders." And he was a little annoyed with me. And so I kind of stood back, and then he did a remarkable thing, an incredible scene.
He lined his men up, I think maybe in part because I asked him. But he lined his men up in a long, horizontal line. And they started to march.
And he said, "Forward march." And they held their guns. And they started marching past the Olympic Committee office, back and forth and back and forth, as if they were hoping they would kind of frighten the Iraqis and the Iraqis would all go home.
And by this time, you know, it was 2:00 and the whole city was on fire. The Iraqis just looked up. They were paper tigers by 2:00 p.m.Remarkable, isn't it?
Here is the link to the
transcript, which comes out to 19 printed pages on single-spaced Wordpad.
