Thanks to Ormonde at Through The Dust for the tip on the statement by Bishop Charles Jenkins on the plan to tear down public housing in New Orleans. Ormonde says:
My bishop, Charles Jenkins, has issued a statement opposing FEMA's decision to evict refugees from trailers and HUD's decision to bulldoze federal housing in New Orleans (already a city with many homeless).
This is, as Bishop Jenkins says, very much a moral issue. Bishop Jenkins' statement is here.
In this holy season, the decision has been made by FEMA that tens of thousands of families or individuals must leave their trailer homes by the spring of next year. Eviction notices are being posted even now. At the very same time, it has been decided by the Housing Authority of New Orleans and HUD that the bulk of the Federal Housing Projects in New Orleans are to be bulldozed to the ground this month. Many of those living in FEMA trailers do not have the resources to find other housing in the notoriously expensive New Orleans housing market. The Case Management system, which is designed to help citizens of the diaspora and those returned home deal with such challenges, is scheduled to end in March of 2008.
As a Christian, I am compelled to speak of the morality of these decisions. The issue is not simply one of housing or even subsidized housing. Rather, the issue before us is primarily a moral issue. The issue before us is not buildings, but people. As the Christ Child had no place but a manger to lay his head, so it is that many children in New Orleans and of the New Orleans diaspora have no place to call home. Shall America by policy treat our citizens as mere statistics or shall we respect the dignity of each person as a child of God? The numbers are huge, but as we were reminded by a thoughtful rabbi in the immediate aftermath of the attack on the World Trade Center, each number represents a human being. It is not that tens of thousands shall be further displaced but that multitudes of human beings shall again be put out - one human being at a time.
The buildings are in disrepair, but they are well-built. They have good bones and could be repaired for much less money than rebuilding from scratch. The New Orleans Housing Authority was corrupt, and they mismanaged public housing in New Orleans for a good number of years. The feds, through HUD, took over management of the housing and didn't do much better in maintaining the buildings and keeping them safe for the residents who lived there. HANO is now back in charge.
Yesterday the bulldozing of the B. W. Cooper project was to begin, but protesters got in the way, and the operations were suspended. The New Orleans Times-Picayune has the story.
Dozens of protesters stalled plans by the Housing Authority of New Orleans to begin demolition of vacant buildings at the B.W. Cooper public housing development Wednesday, signaling the start of a contentious battle between what the government calls progress and dissenters view as an attack on the poor in post-Katrina New Orleans.
....
That fact meant nothing to the protesters, who managed to claim a victory, if only for one evening, as HANO and the city attorney's office agreed to halt demolition late Wednesday and possibly start fresh today.
....
Many residents of public housing reacted to the sight of the excavators with expressions of sadness and voiced distrust of the government's plans for "revitalization" of HANO's properties.
'It's home'
"It's not the lakefront, but it's home," said Ralph Lewis, 51, who was born and lived at Cooper until he evacuated before Katrina struck.
....
Tanya Davis, 44, said many of her missing neighbors are stuck in Texas or Georgia or Arkansas, waiting to come home.
....
Davis applied for her first "project," a one-bedroom apartment, more than a quarter-century ago, when she was a young mother. She got it.
"I started from there," she said. She's been working steadily ever since like most of her neighbors, she said. The ones who didn't work were disabled or senior citizens on a fixed income, people whom she and others helped by paying cab fare or fixing meals. "It was a tight-knit community. Everybody was close," she said.
The majority of the residents were working people, or they were elderly or disabled. The were not the deadbeats that we hear so much about. The powers have said that there is public housing that is now sitting vacant, but Bishop Jenkins addresses that point too.
Beware the claim that low cost housing is available and going unclaimed in New Orleans. There is more to this than empty apartments. The capacity of the growing homeless population in New Orleans and those of the Diaspora to qualify for these apartments, should they exist, is compromised. Without assistance, without case management, many do not have the ability to qualify for these apartments. So, if FEMA is putting people on the streets, many will decide that if they are going to be homeless, they would rather be homeless in New Orleans than in Houston or Atlanta. We face the potential of an extended situation not unlike that we saw in the Superdome immediately after Katrina.
Altogether, this statement from Bishop Jenkins is excellent. I admire greatly his advocacy on this issue. We need to hear from the leadership in the churches on matters of justice such as this. Thank you, Bishop Jenkins. Thank you, Ormonde, for calling attention to the bishop's statement.
The inability or unwillingness - both, in my opinion - of the US government to restore normalcy in the wake of Katrina - with the noteworthy exception of Biloxi, whose resurgence is a shining example of what the gambling industry, in cahoots with the Feds, can achieve when it's in the interests of the REALLY rich to make the effort - are a frightening invoice for what is to come.
ReplyDeleteWhat the Katrina debacle really heralds is what awaits this country when widespread disaster - West-coast earthquake; landfall of a major hurricane between Washington and Boston; nuclear "accident", or just a good, old-fashioned Great Depression - strikes a major conurbation, as sooner, rather than later,it surely will.
Not in our lifetimes. Perhaps. I hope.
Your bishop is a good man, with a strong social conscience. He seems to have grown stronger in the wake of Katrina and I wish him well.
"This could be you," is the word that I continue to pass on with respect to the federal government giving help - or not - when it's needed.
ReplyDeleteYour bishop is misinformed.
ReplyDeleteFEMA is working to relocate these individuals to other housing. And for the record there is NO HOUSING SHORTAGE in New Orleans. There are currently thousands of apartment units sitting ready for occupancy. The housing shortage was only a reality in the aftermath of Katrina. The shortage ceased to exist in 2007.
Are you and your readers aware that many of the individuals still receiving Katrina assistance make in excess of $50,000 a year? There are documented incidences of individuals making over $90,000 a year and still receiving FEMA assistance. The real reason for the hue and cry is that the government has implemented a plan for those who will remain on assistance to pay a portion of their rent beginning in March 2008. The tenant paid portion will begin at $50 and increase by $50 every month until March 2009 at which time the program is designed to sunset. Every recipient family has been assigned a case worker and they will work indivdidually with families. Those who simply cannot make it on their own will be referred to the Section 8 program for assistance. The elderly are anticipated to be the largest group of recipients for this program.
As to rebuilding the projects, you are also misinformed if you think it is cheaper to renovate than to rebuild. When mold is involved it is EXTREMELY costly to renovate and there is no guarantee that the mold has been eradicated. Before people, especially bishops, start expressing opinions, they should become informed of the facts. If America truly knew just how much assistance was being given out, they would be appalled.
Another issue is those who are unemployed by choice. The unemployment rate here is at all time lows. Anyone who wants a job can find one. Maybe the better portion would be if the good bishop would set up an employment assistance office.
Or maybe FEMA finds it cheaper and far less trouble to anonymously disseminate disinformation talking points on blogs on which they are criticized? I have friends who have been displaced Katrina refugees for more than two years and know something of what is and is not happening. The disinformation currently on this page is not coming from Mimi's bishop.
ReplyDeleteAnonymous, I'd take the word of my bishop over someone who leaves an anonymous comment on my blog any old day.
ReplyDeleteYour comments include the same tired, old conservative BS about deadbeats that I've heard over and over. Take them elsewhere. You have no credibility with me. Zero. Got that?
Anonymous 2, thanks for your comment. I agree.
The "projects" in New Orleans were notorious for their mean and dispiriting treatment of low-income, (almost always)African-American folk thirty years ago when my wife and I celebrated our marriage with a brief visit(featuring wild money spent on one dinner at Galatoire's). Now we hear the hateful rhetoric started by St. Ronny, the actor, with his absurd welfare cadillac stories.
ReplyDeleteUrban legends are just that, and they do not reflect the grindingly difficult lives of the working poor. Good for Bishop Jenkins to draw attention to the Gospel imperative: FEED MY SHEEP.
What if we did it right this time, actually providing livable, decent housing for the working poor? Probably a pipe-dream, don't you think, as Republicans take control of Louisiana from the hopelessly corrupt and inept Democrats who preceeded them. Same song, second, even meaner, verse.
The more you tell me about your bishop, the more I like him.
ReplyDeleteOh, and I always ask anonymous commentators to identify themselves.
Same song, second, even meaner, verse.
ReplyDeleteJohn D, that is my expectation from our man Jindal. I hope I'm wrong.
Tim, the bishop is doing a fine thing by speaking out, but you see what he has to contend with from folks like the first anonymous, who are not few in number. They don't want the low income people to return.
I should ask the anonymous commentors to make up a name and sign at the bottom of their comment.
This is another outrage--it wasn't enough to push people into trailers instead of the beautiful, practical cottages that could have been built for about the same amount; now the powers that be want to to kick people out of the inadequate housing into which they were forced, and to bulldoze the housing they could use.
ReplyDeleteHow long, O Lord?
Yes, Nina, another outrage. Par for the course. The bishop really gets it. Just because there is housing available and folks without housing, that does not mean that those people will get into the housing that's available. Many are caught in Catch-22 situations in which they don't fit neatly into a particular category that the rules and red tape call for.
ReplyDelete