Friday, March 30, 2012

YES TO ANGLICAN COMMUNION

Commentary from the church press on the defeat of the Anglican Covenant in the Church of England.

Giles Fraser in the Church Times:
I WILL not disguise my joy at the death of the Anglican Covenant. And death it is — despite the fact that some people will inevitably try to give its corpse the kiss of life. The idea that the Church of England has given it so emphatic a thumbs-down, especially in the face of huge episcopal and archiepiscopal lobby­ing, is evidence of how un­popular the idea is in the pews.

Here, the majority of bishops have shown themselves to be completely out of touch with the centre of gravity of the Church of England. It is not that we do not care about our brothers and sisters in other parts of the Communion. It is simply that we want our Christian solidarity to be expressed through our Anglican heritage, our common baptism, and the development of friendships — and not through a treaty that can be haggled over by church politicians, the purpose of which was always to isolate those Churches that had a different view of sexual ethics.
 From the Church of Ireland Gazette:
The moral of the story has at least two dimensions. First, from a practical perspective, when faced with a divisive crisis, setting up a bureaucratic procedure that is going to take years to get anywhere, if it is to get anywhere at all, is hardly a good idea. If anyone thought that ‘buying time’ would allow the same-sex relationships imbroglio to subside, that was a very mistaken notion, and we in the Church of Ireland do need to take note of that as we face our own difficulties over the issue.

Second, from a more conceptual perspective, we now know, as surely as we can know, that Anglicanism is set to remain a Communion of wholly autonomous Cchurches (sic), bound together by ‘bonds of affection’. It should be added, however, that such mutual affection is far from a weak ideal; it is, in fact, a considerable calling and it is surely true that at times we do have to work at loving one another. There has been talk about being in communion implying ‘interdependence’ and thus justifying central regulation, however light, but that interdependence argument is actually quite vague because everything in the world is interdependent and, from an ecclesiological perspective, all Christians of whatever denomination, in communion or out of communion, are interdependent. Thus, as Anglicans, we are all, across the globe, now challenged to ponder our affection for one another and, where it is waning, to seek to nurture it carefully and prayerfully.
That's our Lesley Crawley, Moderator of No Anglican Covenant Coalition, which is mentioned in the article.


Also from the Church Times:
Speaking on Monday, Dr Williams said: “This is, of course, a disap­pointing outcome for many of us in the Church of England and many more in the Communion. Unfor­tunately, the challenges the Covenant was meant to address will not go away just because people vote against it.

"We shall still have to work at vehicles for consultation and manag­ing disagreement. And nothing should lessen the priority of sus­taining relationships, especially with some of those smaller and vulner­able Churches for whom strong international links are so crucial.”
 Of course, we face challenges in the Communion, and we will have to work on relationships, just not through the vehicle of the covenant.

And it appears that Archbishop Rowan has given up on trying to resuscitate the covenant in the Church of England.




H/T to Simon Sarmiento at Thinking Anglicans for the links and to MadPriest for the cartoon.

7 comments:

  1. Thankfully it does seem he's given up.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The Diocese of Manchester voted to defeat the covenant today.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Slightly off-thread I notice Giles Fraser has now got a new job at a parish church just down the road from the FT (half an hours' walk). I do work some Sundays so I should drop by, tho they only seem to do one 10am service, too early for me. He will be writing a column about it in the Guardian too.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Cathy, thanks for the info. I checked out St Mary's Newington, which seems a rather poor parish. The church is surely not an architectural gem, but perhaps the position will suit Giles better than being canon at an icon such as St Paul's.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The church was bombed during WWII. A tower and a doorway(?) seem to be the only remains of the old church.

    ReplyDelete
  6. A lot of inner city London was bombed during WWII (as I'm sure you know :) ). He talks in the Guardian today about wanting to go to a poorer parish on principle. Here da link: http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2012/apr/01/canon-st-pauls-parish-priest

    ReplyDelete
  7. Yes, I know. St Paul's barely escaped. All the ugly post-WWII buildings near the cathedral are a blight.

    I'd read the article you linked already. Giles seems like a good man.

    ReplyDelete

Anonymous commenters, please sign a name, any name, to distinguish one anonymous commenter from another. Thank you.