From the New York Times:
Given hardening Republican opposition to Congressional health care proposals, Democrats now say they see little chance of the minority’s cooperation in approving any overhaul, and are increasingly focused on drawing support for a final plan from within their own ranks.
Top Democrats said Tuesday that their go-it-alone view was being shaped by what they saw as Republicans’ purposely strident tone against health care legislation during this month’s Congressional recess, as well as remarks by leading Republicans that current proposals were flawed beyond repair.
Rahm Emanuel, the White House chief of staff, said the heated opposition was evidence that Republicans had made a political calculation to draw a line against any health care changes, the latest in a string of major administration proposals that Republicans have opposed.
Finally they see the light! What took them so long? Did the Dems really think that they would bring Republicans along, even after this statement by Sen. Jim DeMint one month ago, "If we're able to stop Obama on this, it will be his Waterloo. It will break him"?
The Democratic shift may not make producing a final bill much easier. The party must still reconcile the views of moderate and conservative Democrats worried about the cost and scope of the legislation with those of more liberal lawmakers determined to win a government-run insurance option to compete with private insurers.
On the other hand, such a change could alter the dynamic of talks surrounding health care legislation, and even change the substance of a final bill. With no need to negotiate with Republicans, Democrats might be better able to move more quickly, relying on their large majorities in both houses.
Democratic senators might feel more empowered, for example, to define the authority of the nonprofit insurance cooperatives that are emerging as an alternative to a public insurance plan.
One wonders if the conservative Democrats are really worried about the cost of the health care plan, or is it rather the cost to them in campaign funds from the health care industry if they support the public option. They don't seem overly concerned when Halliburton, Blackwater, and other companies with government contracts rip off taxpayers' money in massive amounts, but when it comes to providing health care to citizens in great need of help, cost concerns kick in.
When will we see that Democratic senators feel empowered enough to actually do something about the health care crisis? What will it take?
The White House has also interpreted critical comments by Senator Charles E. Grassley of Iowa, the top Republican negotiator in a crucial Finance Committee effort to reach a bipartisan compromise, as a sign that there is little hope of reaching a deal politically acceptable to both parties.
A brilliant interpretation. Again, finally the White House joins the Congress in seeing the light. I see it! I see it! Look there's the light! The Republicans won't deal with us.
For the second time in two days, Mr. Obama did not mention health care on Tuesday, a marked departure from the aggressive public relations campaign he mounted in July and early August. The White House is striving to stay out of the fray, aides said, until the president can get away on vacation this weekend.
And doesn't that make you want to cry? The president wants to stay out of the fray and get away! I know I've said this over and over in the comments here, there, and everywhere, but please, someone, somewhere remind President Obama about the bully pulpit!
As for the much-discussed non-profit cooperatives (whatever they are) being pushed by conservative Democrats who want so much to have a bipartisan bill:
In what Democrats regarded as further evidence that Republicans were not serious about negotiating, Mr. Kyl and Representative Eric Cantor of Virginia, the second-ranking House Republican, described a co-op as a public option carrying another name.
There you go, Democrats. No matter what compromises you make, you will not have a bipartisan bill. You are a majority. We elected you to move forward with a progressive agenda. Do your job. Folks are hurting. They need help. Do the right thing!
Do I sound shrill?
If you sound shrill, then Lord knows what I've sounded like over this issue.
ReplyDeleteOne commentator who I can't remember (Digby?) said that healthcare is indeed Obama's Waterloo. It's up to him to decide whether he wants to be Napoleon or Wellington.
I'm also puzzled by Obama's detachment on all of this. The ones doing the really serious caucusing on this issue seem to be the Congressional Progressives. That initiative should be coming from the White House.
Counterlight, Tobias Haller suggested that Obama and the Archbishop of Canterbury may be similar types who live too much in their heads, see all the possibilities, and, as a result, suffer from a kind of paralysis. I think he could be right.
ReplyDeleteYou are not shrill. You are persistent but still a southern lady. But I think we all need to get shrill if we are going to get their attention. Evidently they are noticing. How they can be surprised at the anger of progressives is beyond me. Public option is already a compromise from single payer. We are not prepared to give it up.
ReplyDeletePaul, if the Dems go down, they could at least go down fighting. The Blue Dogs infuriate me. They are a frightened bunch of weenies. Couldn't they rouse the courage do the right thing, even though they're afraid? Sometimes? Once?
ReplyDeleteCan a weasel change its spots? If I may mix metaphors.
ReplyDeletePAUL, I live for mixed metaphors.
ReplyDeleteInteresting question.
ReplyDeleteIf they can't find the cojones to do it alone, it isn't going to get done.
Why has it taken them so long to realize that Republicans are lying whenever they use the word "bipartisan?" Republicans want only one thing, to destroy Obama. All else is nothing but pieces on a gaming board.
And, it's about time Obama turns his head away from the Golden Calf he's made of "bipartisanship." It's leading him astray.
Someone here in town told Grandpère that he fully expected riots if Obama was elected, but they didn't happen. There are a lot of very angry folks, some half-crazy and a few full-crazy, out and about, and many of them are armed.
ReplyDeleteI'm not sure the Obama - Rowan Williams comparison quite works.
ReplyDeleteThe Archbishop is an academic accustomed to abstract thinking and totally out of his element when it comes to politics.
Obama got his start in politics in Chicago under the mentorship of the late Harold Washington. Obama, like Washington, prefers coalition and consensus building, both a great strength and a great weakness.
Nasty old Machiavelli was right when he said that politics is the art of the possible.
...and serious healthcare reform looks to me to very possible now.
Counterlight, I believe Tobias was referring to the high intelligence of the two men, which enabled them to see connections and possibilities that others don't see and which, at the same time, makes it difficult for them to make choices and stick with them.
ReplyDeleteAt the moment, neither seems skilled at consensus building, as they are alienating people on all fronts.
♪ Tra-la-la ♫ Tweedle-dee-d-dee, It gives me a thrill,
ReplyDelete♫ To wake up in the mornin' to the Wounded Bird's Shrill~ ♪ ♫