Monday, May 10, 2010

"A DISASTER THE LIKE OF WHICH HAS NEVER BEEN SEEN BEFORE"


From Radio Netherlands:

While the world’s attention is focused on the growing oil slick from the Deepwater Horizon oil well in the Gulf of Mexico, there is an unseen environmental disaster taking place underwater. Invisible substances underneath are wreaking havoc on an enormous scale, just as much as the very visible black sludge above.

The well, 1,500 metres under the sea off the Louisiana coast, is responsible for a disaster the like of which has never been seen before. This is not because of the amount of oil pouring into the sea, 800,000 litres per day, says eco-toxicologist John Schobben from the Dutch Institute for Marine Resources and Ecosystem Studies (IMARES). The situation is unique because the oil is coming directly from the well and contains substances that have long been removed from the sort of oil leaked by tankers.

“What you normally see is fuel oil which floats on the water and mostly affects birds and mammals, but oil straight from the well contains substances like PAKs, the black smut you find on barbeques. They are carcinogenic and dissolve in water. You also get volatile substances like toluene and benzene which kill fish, plankton and mussels.”


Mississippi
The most important aspect of any oil disaster is the protection and clean-up of the coast. Mr Scobben is first to admit that the environmental damage to the land is many times greater than that suffered in the sea. The Mississippi delta is a valuable ecosystem involving both fresh and salt water life. Turtles come ashore to lay their eggs and the area is a hub for nesting birds. The timing of the disaster could not be worse, coming as it does in the middle of the brooding season.

Nevertheless, Mr Schobben maintains that the leak’s submarine damage is being underestimated. IMARES research shows that PAKs and volatile substances disturb the submarine eco-balance long-term. There only need be one species hit for others to be given the opportunity to move in. He calls this phenomenon ‘species shift’.

“You see an unnatural situation emerging. An area will never be completely dead. There will always be something left alive but it’s not a natural ecosystem anymore. That will eventually recover, but it takes a very long time.”

Before now, I have not seen reporting on the difference between oil that leaks from a tanker and oil spewing directly from a well and the vast difference in toxicity. Maybe it's out there, and I missed it. Even if the oil never reaches more land than at present, the disaster will be far greater than I ever imagined, and I've taken a pessimistic view from the beginning.

Thanks to JayV at Blazing Indiscretions for sending me the link.

Photo from The Huffington Post.

13 comments:

  1. I would think that Mr. Scobben is essentially correct, but raw crude oil, which is the stuff from the wells is often shipped to refineries. The amount of nasty stuff varies by location, but all crude has them. That doesn't mean he's not right about the spread of nasty stuff on the sea floor that will impact (kill) marine organisms for years to come. BP is acting irresponsibly while trying to appear responsible.

    ReplyDelete
  2. So then, raw crude oil is sometimes shipped to refineries in container vessels without treatment? I wondered about that. But the amount that the container holds is, at least, limited, although the load can be quite large.

    ReplyDelete
  3. From a quick Google search, apparently the crude oil is treated to varying extents before being loaded into tankers, but how much of the toxins are removed, I can't say from the results of my search.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I want to say something Grandmère but don't know what.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I too am speechless. And if you know me, that's something! What have we done to our beautiful world???

    ReplyDelete
  6. I weep but what good are my tears? I will try to be a more responsible steward in a small way... but even that is too small.

    May God have mercy on us.

    ReplyDelete
  7. what a terrible, terrible mess. What can anyone say, or do.

    ReplyDelete
  8. It keeps getting worse and worse....

    We have switched from fuel oil to natural gas at the church.... expensive switch, but only in the short run, and we are a little greener for it....

    ReplyDelete
  9. I am so sad - there just is no good news as this event continues. My prayers are still with you all.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I come back from the weekend - Jonathan's suicidal again, we've wrecked our planet, Mark Harris presents us with an even grimmer view of the AC crisis. I'm just shutting down.

    I see two reasonably viable choices - retreat from Mankind, or purge it.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I come back from the weekend - Jonathan's suicidal again, we've wrecked our planet, Mark Harris presents us with an even grimmer view of the AC crisis.

    I find Mimi's moonshine liquor helps.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Mark, we don't call it Blue Monday for nothing. Read about the origins of the term. Blame it on the Welsh.

    I should put up a link to the liquor dispensary on Mondays.

    ReplyDelete

Anonymous commenters, please sign a name, any name, to distinguish one anonymous commenter from another. Thank you.