Tuesday, September 14, 2010

OLD LITURGICAL DRESS STYLES


Sr. Guendaline de Raymond, in religion Mother Marie Veronique Giuliani, 1873.
The formality of the setting – the damask covered table, the rich crucifix – correspond to her rank as abbess, shown by the long train, an emblem of jurisdiction.

This nun, definitely a beauty, strikes a melancholy, elegant and romantic pose. Note the curious style of her shoes, of the same material of her dress.

The abbess is beautiful and elegant, indeed.



Cardinal Giuseppe Ugolini (1783 + 1867)
The Cardinal is wearing the red tabarro edged with gold braid and red silk stockings, and wears his coat unbuttoned, as usual in the 18th century. Note the elegant, worldly nonchalance of the Cardinal’s pose, and the coiffure à la Brutus, that had been fashionable in his youth.

The cardinal is.... Sorry. I'm speechless.



Unidentified cardinal.
The ferraioletto is attached to his shoulders; note the red silk lining of his coat, and the large three cornered hat with red cords and tassels on the table.

Hmmm. The shoes - and the elegant show of the leg....



Canon Albini, Vigevano
A canon of the cathedral of Vigevano.
Again, while wearing the cassock and ferraiolo, this canon from Vigevano has the traditional three cornered hat, but smaller in size than the enormous Roman ones.

I wonder. Is the canon a visionary?

From New Liturgical Movement.

A series of historical photographs have recently come to light, coming from the papers of a Roman princely family and taken between 1850 and 1880 by the famous Roman photographers, D’Alessandri. These photographs show not only members of fashionable Roman society, but also include photographs of a number of prelates and ecclesiastics, almost all of whom were of noble birth. Most of these wear the traditional abito corto, while several others wear either the new abito Piano, or formal choir dress.

The old pictures in the series truly are marvelous. Even as I laughed, I found the old photographs fascinating. Customs and fashions change, and, no doubt, future generations will howl with laughter at the fashions of today.

Thanks to Lapin for the link.

18 comments:

  1. Oh, but we MUST keep Teh Homosexuals out of the clergy!

    {snort}

    ReplyDelete
  2. Love this link! I found this info that was with a picture you didn't use. Cardinal Antonelli seems to have been quite teh blade! And much maligned. Hmm.


    "Cardinal Antonelli, the much maligned Secretary of State of Pius IX, was a brilliant statesman and minister of finance, and one of the last Cardinals never having been ordained priest, but simply tonsured. Extraordinarily handsome as a young man, he collected rare flowers and precious stones."

    ReplyDelete
  3. I like <a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_oN5K_WcO5JM/TImAbcxbasI/AAAAAAAAGvc/BCkhQVdvZj4/s1600/19.jpg>this one</a> -- OY! my head!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Oh, Ann, yes. Such world weariness. . . Those monks had it hard.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I forgot to say Thanks, Mimi! So, Thanks, Mimi. My morning is brightened!!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Might make a striking new avatar for someone or other, Ann.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Or the Melancholy Monk?

    And the lace on the rochets of Cardinal Antonelli and others!

    I'm glad you enjoyed these and the other pictures at the site, Susan.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Why are the men more willing to show their leg than the woman?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Ormonde, an excellent question, indeed.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Cardinal Ugolini reminds me or Ernest Thesiger... in more ways that one.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Tobias, I agree. From Wikipedia about Ernest:

    He enlisted in the military at the outbreak of the World War I in 1914, allegedly hoping to be assigned to a Scottish regiment because he wanted to wear a kilt....

    ReplyDelete
  12. Ran in the family, maybe? A sideline of Ernest's cousin Wilfred, in old age a guru of the prince of Wales, was photographing teenage male Bedouin and Marsh Arabs, wearing nothing below the waist.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Why are the men more willing to show their leg than the woman?

    Because they've got pretty damn good legs? ...

    ReplyDelete
  14. How is it that the word fabulous has not yet been used in connection to this post? ;-/

    ReplyDelete
  15. Cathy, ya think?

    Lapin, you get more and more outré with your links.

    How is it that the word fabulous has not yet been used....

    Well, it has now, JCF.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Chacun à son gout, Cardinal. Thanks for visiting.

    ReplyDelete

Anonymous commenters, please sign a name, any name, to distinguish one anonymous commenter from another. Thank you.