From the Daily Mail:
For scholars of faith and history, it is a treasure trove too precious for price.
This ancient collection of 70 tiny books, their lead pages bound with wire, could unlock some of the secrets of the earliest days of Christianity.
Academics are divided as to their authenticity but say that if verified, they could prove as pivotal as the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls in 1947.
On pages not much bigger than a credit card, are images, symbols and words that appear to refer to the Messiah and, possibly even, to the Crucifixion and Resurrection.
Adding to the intrigue, many of the books are sealed, prompting academics to speculate they are actually the lost collection of codices mentioned in the Bible’s Book Of Revelation.
....
But the mysteries between their ancient pages are not the books’ only riddle. Today, their whereabouts are also something of a mystery. After their discovery by a Jordanian Bedouin, the hoard was subsequently acquired by an Israeli Bedouin, who is said to have illegally smuggled them across the border into Israel, where they remain.
However, the Jordanian Government is now working at the highest levels to repatriate and safeguard the collection. Philip Davies, emeritus professor of biblical studies at Sheffield University, said there was powerful evidence that the books have a Christian origin in plates cast into a picture map of the holy city of Jerusalem.
No, the picture and story above are not an April Fool's joke, and, yes, the story is from the Daily Mail because the newspaper had the best pictures.
However, the story from the BBC website is similar and includes additional information and further commentary from scholars.
A group of 70 or so "books", each with between five and 15 lead leaves bound by lead rings, was apparently discovered in a remote arid valley in northern Jordan somewhere between 2005 and 2007.
A flash flood had exposed two niches inside the cave, one of them marked with a menorah or candlestick, the ancient Jewish religious symbol.
A Jordanian Bedouin opened these plugs, and what he found inside might constitute extremely rare relics of early Christianity.
....
Margaret Barker, an authority on New Testament history, points to the location of the reported discovery as evidence of Christian, rather than purely Jewish, origin.
"We do know that on two occasions groups of refugees from the troubles in Jerusalem fled east, they crossed the Jordan near Jericho and then they fled east to very approximately where these books were said to have been found," she says.
"[Another] one of the things that is most likely pointing towards a Christian provenance, is that these are not scrolls but books. The Christians were particularly associated with writing in a book form rather than scroll form, and sealed books in particular as part of the secret tradition of early Christianity."
The Book of Revelation refers to such sealed texts.
We shall see what further information is forthcoming on the tiny leaden books, but if the first century date is authenticated, they will be of great interest to scholars and a good many of the rest of us.
Thanks to Lapin and Ann V. for the links.
UPDATE: The photo has disappeared twice. Perhaps the Mail won't allow me to post. I'll keep watch and switch to the BBC's picture if the photo disappears again.
UPDATE 2: Rogue Classicism, who's been following the story says, "I think we can pretty much stick a fork in this one …"
Without the information from the BBC, I would never have bothered to post on the story.
Mimi,
ReplyDeleteYou can download the photo to your machine, and then upload it to blogger yourself. That way it doesn't have to go to the Mail site every time to get it, and won't get blocked by traffic.
IT, thanks. I downloaded the picture to my Picasa, but I have problems with pics disappearing when I use Picasa's "Blog this" function to upload to my blog. I need to remember to upload through my browser. So many small details to remember.... :-)
ReplyDelete...a whiff of something... maybe fraud? --just don't trust this yet.... do you?
ReplyDelete--just don't trust this yet.... do you?
ReplyDeletemargaret, not really. My first response was skepticism. We shall see. I report; you decide. :-)
The Mail nearly always has the best pictures, unfortunately.
ReplyDeleteI don't trust the story either.
It does seem to be a curious business.
ReplyDeleteOh dear! It seems Elkington is not to be trusted.
ReplyDeleteThis raises serious questions about this matter.
ReplyDeleteAnd here. "I think we can pretty much stick a fork in this one."
ReplyDeleteYou might want to go to the Rogue Classicism blog post here as there is a pretty comprehensive skeptical treatment of the case there.
ReplyDeleteChris, thanks. I'd read that entry, too. We can stick two forks in it. :-)
ReplyDeleteAnd now the Daily Telegraph has breathed new life into Elkington. He looks uncannily like Brad Dourif, which is appropriate and will come in handy when the movie is made. And now, Elkington claims, Rowan is involved
ReplyDeleteLapin, the story seems less and less true. A "Wow!" from expert Margaret Barker after seeing only the pictures is hardly convincing, but I may yet be surprised.
ReplyDeleteI saw a claim somewhere yesterday that these "codices" prove that Jesus was gay.
ReplyDeleteBesides the fact that a claim such as that would be ridiculously difficult to prove, this whole foofaraw reminds me of the controversy surrounding Morton Smith's "discovery" of a "Secret Gospel of Mark" within a letter purported to be from Clement of Alexandria. Smith was one of my professors at Columbia, and I was matriculating around the time that his books on the subject were being published and discussed. A websearch on "Secret Gospel of Mark" will tell you more than you wanted to know on the subject.
Suffice it to say, Smith's "discovery" is now almost universally considered a forgery. In it, there were hints of a homosexual nature around Jesus and the early disciples, but Smith always maintained (he's been dead 20 years now) that he said no such thing.
So the only difference between these codices and Smith's forgery is that the codices actually exist, whereas Smith's manuscript disappeared soon after he photographed it and has never been found since.
I think that people are always hopeful that more original scripture from the time immediately following the Crucifixion will turn up, and when something like this seems to surface, people's critical faculties often disappear.
Chris, I think you're right. People continue to hope for a finding equivalent in importance to the Dead Sea Scrolls that will shed light on the missing decades.
ReplyDelete