Occupy Wall Street has now released an official statement which is posted below.
From PlutocracyFiles at Daily Kos:
Declaration of the Occupation of New York CityThere it is, what I asked for, and I was not overly enthusiastic about the statement, even though it's based on the splendid 'Declaration of Independence'. It's so 18th century. It's long. The 21st century folks with their short attention spans won't get the message. The demands must be expressed in easy-to-understand language, briefly and punchily, to get the point across today.
As we gather together in solidarity to express a feeling of mass injustice, we must not lose sight of what brought us together. We write so that all people who feel wronged by the corporate forces of the world can know that we are your allies.
As one people, united, we acknowledge the reality: that the future of the human race requires the cooperation of its members; that our system must protect our rights, and upon corruption of that system, it is up to the individuals to protect their own rights, and those of their neighbors; that a democratic government derives its just power from the people, but corporations do not seek consent to extract wealth from the people and the Earth; and that no true democracy is attainable when the process is determined by economic power. We come to you at a time when corporations, which place profit over people, self-interest over justice, and oppression over equality, run our governments. We have peaceably assembled here, as is our right, to let these facts be known.
They have taken our houses through an illegal foreclosure process, despite not having the original mortgage.
They have taken bailouts from taxpayers with impunity, and continue to give Executives exorbitant bonuses.
They have perpetuated inequality and discrimination in the workplace based on age, the color of one’s skin, sex, gender identity and sexual orientation.
They have poisoned the food supply through negligence, and undermined the farming system through monopolization.
They have profited off of the torture, confinement, and cruel treatment of countless nonhuman animals, and actively hide these practices.
They have continuously sought to strip employees of the right to negotiate for better pay and safer working conditions.
They have held students hostage with tens of thousands of dollars of debt on education, which is itself a human right.
They have consistently outsourced labor and used that outsourcing as leverage to cut workers’ healthcare and pay.
They have influenced the courts to achieve the same rights as people, with none of the culpability or responsibility.
They have spent millions of dollars on legal teams that look for ways to get them out of contracts in regards to health insurance.
They have sold our privacy as a commodity.
They have used the military and police force to prevent freedom of the press.
They have deliberately declined to recall faulty products endangering lives in pursuit of profit.
They determine economic policy, despite the catastrophic failures their policies have produced and continue to produce.
They have donated large sums of money to politicians supposed to be regulating them.
They continue to block alternate forms of energy to keep us dependent on oil.
They continue to block generic forms of medicine that could save people’s lives in order to protect investments that have already turned a substantive profit.
They have purposely covered up oil spills, accidents, faulty bookkeeping, and inactive ingredients in pursuit of profit.
They purposefully keep people misinformed and fearful through their control of the media.
They have accepted private contracts to murder prisoners even when presented with serious doubts about their guilt.
They have perpetuated colonialism at home and abroad.
They have participated in the torture and murder of innocent civilians overseas.
They continue to create weapons of mass destruction in order to receive government contracts.*
To the people of the world,
We, the New York City General Assembly occupying Wall Street in Liberty Square, urge you to assert your power.
Exercise your right to peaceably assemble; occupy public space; create a process to address the problems we face, and generate solutions accessible to everyone.
To all communities that take action and form groups in the spirit of direct democracy, we offer support, documentation, and all of the resources at our disposal.
Join us and make your voices heard!
*These grievances are not all-inclusive.
Sadly, I still did not 'get it'.
And then I read the op-ed by Richard Eskow at The Huffington Post, and the scales fell from my eyes.
Even the sympathizers don't always get it. I'm sure I get a lot of things wrong too, but here's one thing I do understand: Change doesn't begin with policy. It begins with perception. And you don't change things by asking. You change them by acting.Please read the entire long, splendid op-ed.
But it begins with perception. "All money is a matter of belief," as someone once said.
In the New York Times, Nick Kristof shows that he understands the #OccupyWallStreet movement more than most of his peers. "The protesters are dazzling in their Internet skills," he writes, "and impressive in their organization."
But like many other sympathetic observers, he misses their most important point when he says "the movement falters in its demands" because "it doesn't really have any."
As movement participant Nelini Stamp told the Take Back the American Dream conference this morning, "We don't have demands. If we make demands of Wall Street, we're saying that Wall Street has the power."
But the fact that the movement doesn't make demands of Wall Street - or Washington, for that matter - doesn't mean it doesn't have demands. It does, but they're not directed at Wall Street, or K Street, or Pennsylvania Avenue. They're directed at you. And at me, and at every other citizen in this country.
....
But the "one demand" that matters most is directed at our society, not our policymakers, and it's much more fundamental than these excellent ideas. The demand is this: "Come back to sanity." That's the underlying demand that unifies all those items on the #OccupyWallSt website. Our culture is insane today, and they recognize that. Create a transactions tax, and they'll simply rob us another way - until we restore our society to sanity.
....
But the main point is: This is a song, not a policy platform, and there's no one composer. Everybody's making it up as they go along, and everyone else is welcome to join - as long as they don't lose the beat.
The demand: 'Come back to sanity.' The main point: 'This is a song.'
Yes, I see. Or rather, I think I see, although I could still be getting it wrong. I hope not. What took me so long?
You get it. You always have --you know something is terribly wrong and you have known it for a very long time. But which of us could put our finger on it? --Now --is there an Occupation in New Orleans? --join in!!! Git singin'!!!!
ReplyDeleteIn my experience, the politics and the actions come first, and the policy statements come later. Usually, what goes into a policy statement is the end result of a lot of arguing and agreement, trial and error. These things tend to make themselves up as they go along.
ReplyDeleteThe tea party mobilized politically, got people elected, and now is the kingmaker of the Republican party.
ReplyDeleteIt is not clear to me that heartfelt statements of idealism from OccupyWallStreet, sympathetic though they are, will lead to a counterbalancing political movement with any practical electoral outcome.
NPR did a story on the OWS group this morning and one young man earnestly explained that his goal was to overthrow our political system. Yeah, I'm not seeing that kind of remark is going to inspire some blue collar guy in Indiana struggling to get to one of his two jobs so he can pay his rent.
Counterlight, that's how I see it now. Stonewall began spontaneously, because gay folks had enough of the injustices. These people have had enough.
ReplyDeleteIT, the movement is democratic, so everyone has a say. Democracy is messy. You could possibly hear as many reasons why people are there as there are people. Give them time.
I'm still fascinated (in a chilling way) by this idea that the GOP as it is currently constituted is the ideal political model.
ReplyDeleteThe insistence on ideological purity has led to Rick Perry being cast out of the role of favorite son, and banished to the place of darkness and gnashing of teeth. The latest poll shows nobody in GOP likes any of their Presidential nominee choices, and all they have in D.C. is opposition to Obama: whatever he's for, they're agin, even if they were for it before Obama was.
And yet this singularity of message is a good thing in contrast with the Democrats, who are supposed to be as rigid as the GOP, only with positions "we" approve of. Or they should at least have a singular message which cannot be denied.
Xianity has something like that, except you'll find traditionally the Franciscans are practically at war with the Jesuits, nobody speaks to the Orthodox churches, and nobody cares what the Copts think (how many divisions do they have?). Protestants still protest against Rome (its' been 500 years, get over it!) and against each other and, again, the solution is supposed to be a grand agreement so we can all just get along and present a united front so people in the West (America, basically) will return to Christianity and fill our pews.
Or something.
I don't favor division for the sake of division, but since when has a bumper sticker message been the highest and best ideal of any human institution? What's wrong in this country? Lots of things. What do we do about it?
How about "something"? Even Peter and Paul never really reconciled on the message after the Ascension. By the time we've settled all disagreements, nobody will care about our agreement.
And the secret word this time is apropos: "Pards". If we can't be of one mind, perhaps we can be of one purpose. Like partners.
The Jon Stewart rally was about sanity too, but long term effects were nill.
ReplyDeleteI think most people get the problem, but are too busy trying to keep it together to effect change. That's why I have to hand it to the tea party; they channelled the energy into action.
In Wisconsin, there was a lovely movement against the corrupt anti worker Republicans that led to a recall but they couldn't win enough seats to regain control. yes. Despite what should have been a no brainer referendum, people still voted Repubs back into office!
I'm sure the right is chuckling at this usual mishmash of lefty groups and its effort to rule by consensus. I m not seeing how this is going to win us any elections in 2012. And winning elections is the only way we will effect change.
IT--
ReplyDeleteNot to start an argument, or even raise a challenge, but you do understand the "Tea Party" is largely an astro-turf movement composted of various groups funded by major corporations or mega-wealthy people like the Koch Brothers?
And the groups were developed by fear-mongering and outright lies? There's almost nothing small "d" democratic about them, and they're only effect now is to drag the GOP so far to the right that even the GOP doesn't want to be there anymore.
Whatever can be said about leftist political movements, like the one that pushed McGovern into the Democratic nomination in '72, they are not bought and paid for, and the creation of big $$$$$.
Yes, RMJ, I know the tea party is a front. But unless the left can figure out how to politically mobilize, I'm not seeing how we make any effective change. and I'm not clear how kids camping out in the park is going to translate into money and votes.
ReplyDeleteAnd need I remind you that the McGovern thing did not end well.
Yes, I wanted to point out also that the Tea Party was funded, shaped, and promoted by the wealthy and powerful, initially to protect the health insurers. It was heavily promoted and still is, regardless of how few their numbers truly are.
ReplyDeleteWe need a national awakening so power can return to the governed. It is like turning around an ocean liner; not done on a dime. But there is some awakening and some movement. I encourage it all because many small streams can become a river.
Did the people overthrow a Republican majority in Wisconsin? No. But they whittled it down a bit and that was a step forward. They are also still mobilizing to recall the governor. People all across the state were excited to be taking some action. It takes time but I am encouraged rather than discouraged.
Frankly, I want to see the banking executives tarred and feathered and run out of town on a rail. I suppose we have laws against that now, more's the pity.
I'm not seeing how we make any effective change. and I'm not clear how kids camping out in the park is going to translate into money and votes.
ReplyDeleteThen I would direct you to my comments on "Occupy Wall Street."
But Mimi has already linked to it.
:-)
And Paul: I agree with you.
I hope you are all right. What I fear is a catastrophic election in 2012 while the left dithers, which will spike your idealism with an effective collapse of our country as we know it.
ReplyDeleteRmj, if I were a Republican in a high position, I'd be rather despairing about the present GOP presidential candidate line-up. I thought Rick Perry's aspirations would be doomed by national scrutiny. Grandpère thought he could be the one to beat Obama, and, right off, I said Perry would not be the candidate.
ReplyDeleteIf we can't be of one mind, perhaps we can be of one purpose.
Yes, I like that.
IT, do you think Wisconsin was a failure because the Dems did not take back the legislature? I don't. Not at all. And I think there is a connection between the Wisconsin protests and OWS.
But there is some awakening and some movement. I encourage it all because many small streams can become a river.
Amen to that, Paul.
Even if immediate results don't appear to follow, the protests won't have been for nothing. The country is passing through a period of insanity, and it's good to have a group pointing that out and willing to put their bodies on the line to try to draw us at least part way back to sanity.
And I have to say that I'm not encouraged that Democrats seem to be pretty caught up in the insanity.
IT, I'm a fairly pessimistic type, but I think the situation may have to get a lot worse before it gets better. I hope I'm wrong.
ReplyDeleteHere's a thought, "Occupy Thibodaux!"
ReplyDeleteDon't laugh, there's an "Occupy Casper, Wyoming" group out there.
The day after the first Stonewall riot, the news was buried deep in the NYTimes and attributed to grief-stricken gay vapors over Judy Garland's recent death. The NY Daily News did give it front page news, but with the headline "Queen Bees Stinging Mad!" The whole thing was broadly dismissed or ignored by the conventional press (as one historian pointed out, a riot that size in Harlem would have been headline news). New York's very small community of gay activists was completely unprepared. There was never any statement of intentions, no press releases, no leadership, and certainly no organization. The suddenly greatly expanded ranks of gay activists spent the next year discussing and arguing over how to take advantage of this great golden goose egg of opportunity that fell into everyone's lap.
But they did eventually figure it out,and history got made.
Politics from the ground up is a messy business, for left and right. It seems to me that the Tea Party Movement may have started as yet another bottom up revolt by the far right (one of several since the Republican Convention of 1952 nominated Eisenhower over Robert Taft), but it got quickly appropriated by some very rich and powerful folk who may well have genuinely supported them, but certainly found them to be very useful (e.g. the Koch Brothers). Lots of corporate money poured in, plus constant plugging by Fox News. I question how far that movement would have gotten without those things.
Left wing movements really are the bootstraps initiatives right wing intellectuals rhapsodize about, only with shoestring budgets and no support or encouragement from the Democratic Party. The antiwar rallies of the Dubya years were the creations of old people and kids together. Kids provided the initiative, the courage, and the muscle, while the retirees did all the fundraising and organizing so that the rest of us middle agers could attend and make our voices heard.
This Occupy Wall Street may be something different, or it may not be. We'll just have to find out.
They may be naive idealistic kids, but cautious-with-age 53 year old me is very grateful for those 20 and 30 somethings willing to take the mace and the body-slams of the NYPD supervisors, as well as the that youthful determination to stick it out through the rain and cold of New York in the Fall in a sleeping bag on the pavement.
It is always better to light a candle ...
Counterlight, I agree with all you've said, except....
ReplyDeleteHere's a thought, "Occupy Thibodaux!"
I'm no organizer, nor do I know anyone in the whole town who would take on the job. There is an Occupy New Orleans happening tomorrow. I can't do the walk; it's too far for this old lady, but I'd like to be in Lafayette Square where the group will gather at the end of the march, before they move on to City Hall. The Federal Building is on Lafayette Square.
Showing how messy democracy is, as of yesterday, the members were still arguing about whether to stay in Lafayette Square or move on to City Hall. I think the decision is to move on to City Hall.
I asked Tom if he wanted to go, dangling the enticement of lunch at a restaurant we both love near the square. He has not decided. We'll see. I don't know if I'll go alone.
"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." Mahatma Gandhi.
ReplyDeleteAnd therein lies our hope, Bex. Thank you for the Gandhi quote.
ReplyDeleteAt this hour, I think we're moving from the "laugh at" to the "fight" stage (I'm listening to Keith Olbermann describe more arrests and pepper-spraying)
ReplyDeleteLord, defend the servants (knowing or not) of Your Reign of Justice, Mercy and Peace...