Showing posts with label US. Show all posts
Showing posts with label US. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 12, 2013

PAUL RYAN'S FREUDIAN SLIP OF THE DAY

In his press conference, as he presents the GOP's radical new budget, Representative Paul Ryan says :
This to us is something that we're not going to give up on, because we're not going to give up on destroying the health care system for the American people.




Ryan's vaunted concern about the deficit is a cover for his true ambition, as Paul Krugman says:
Meanwhile, he was pursuing radical redistribution away from the needy to the wealthy.

Nothing has changed, except that the plan has gotten even crueler.
Thanks to "The Jed Report" at Daily Kos for the link to the video.

Monday, January 2, 2012

IOWA: A MICROCOSM OF THE US - NOT!

The graphs below, which were posted by Juan Cole at Informed Comment, show the percentages of the various ethnic voters in the State of Iowa as compared to the percentages of the entire US. The crowd of Republican candidates, which consists of five white men and one white woman, is scrambling for votes in tomorrow's VERY IMPORTANT IOWA CAUCUSES, which Cole labels "Conservative White People’s Primary".



The candidates:

Michele Bachmann
Newt Gingrich
Ron Paul
Rick Perry
Mitt Romney
Rick Santorum

Who will win? From Washington Post Politics:
Over the past few months, Iowa has embraced and then rejected four charismatic front-runners: Rep. Michele Bachmann (Minn.), Perry, Gingrich and pizza executive Herman Cain.
Fickle, fickle Iowans.

Sunday, August 14, 2011

SAVE THE CHILDREN IN THE US! - UN REPORT ON CHILD WELFARE

From the United Nations report: An overview of child well-being in rich countries (PDF).

A comprehensive assessment of the lives
and well-being of children and adolescents
in the economically advanced nations


Click on the image for the enlarged view.
There we are at the bottom of the list in overall welfare of children, not quite last but next to last. Shameful isn't it?

I'm not especially fond of perusing charts, graphs, or statistics, but I found the report easy to understand.

Sunday, July 31, 2011

QUESTION OF THE DAY

Why do I once again feel that I live in the country of no hope?

Thursday, May 5, 2011

TOP 10 UNITED STATES DESTINATIONS

1. New York City, New York

2. Honolulu, Hawaii

3. San Francisco, California

4. Las Vegas, Nevada

5. Lahaina, Hawaii

6. Kailua-Kona, Hawaii

7. New Orleans, Louisiana

8. San Diego, California

9. Sedona, Arizona

10. Seattle, Washington

See the entire list of the top 25 most popular places visited in the US at TripAdvisor.

Tuesday, September 28, 2010

ARE WE A BANANA REPUBLIC YET?

From Philly.com

WASHINGTON - The income gap between the richest and poorest Americans grew last year to its widest amount on record as young adults and children in particular struggled to stay afloat in the recession.

The top-earning 20 percent of Americans - those making more than $100,000 each year - received 49.4 percent of all income generated in the U.S., compared with the 3.4 percent earned by those below the poverty line, according to newly released census figures. That ratio of 14.5-to-1 was an increase from 13.6 in 2008 and nearly double a low of 7.69 in 1968.

A different measure, the international Gini index, found U.S. income inequality at its highest level since the Census Bureau began tracking household income in 1967. The U.S. also has the greatest disparity among Western industrialized nations.
(My emphasis)
....

An -GfK Poll this month found that by 54 percent to 44 percent, most Americans support raising taxes on the highest U.S. earners. Still, many congressional Democrats have expressed wariness about provoking the 44 percent minority so close to Election Day.

"We're pretty good about not talking about income inequality," Danziger said.

My, my, we ARE good at sticking our heads in the sand and keeping them there when the subject of income inequality comes up. You'd think that the Democrats running for office would feel pressed to spell out policies for reducing the income gap between the rich and the poor. You'd think that they'd promote policies for restoring the numbers of the disappearing middle class. You'd think that these matters would be major talking points in their campaigns, but if you thought that, you'd be wrong.