Tuesday, March 10, 2009

Dolly And The Queen


Dolly Parton


and Queen Elizabeth


die on the same day and they both go before an Angel to find out if they'll be admitted to Heaven. Unfortunately, there's only one space left that day, so the angel must decide which of them gets in. The Angel asks Dolly if there's some particular reason why she should get into Heaven.

Dolly takes off her top and says, 'Look at these, they're the most perfect breasts God ever created, and I'm sure the angels will be pleased to see them every day, for eternity.'

The Angel thanks Dolly, and asks Her Majesty the same question.

The Queen takes a bottle of Perrier out of her purse, shakes it up, and gargles. Then, she spits into a toilet and pulls the lever.

The angel chuckles and says, 'Okay, Your Majesty, you may go in.'

Dolly is outraged and asks, 'What was that all about? I show you two of God's own perfect creations and you turn me down. She spits into a commode and gets in! Would you explain that to me?'

'Sorry, Dolly,' says the angel, but, even in Heaven,



a royal flush


beats a pair - no matter how big they are.


Don't blame me, blame Doug.

Monday, March 9, 2009

My Other Family

As many of you know, the family of my childhood and youth was seriously dysfunctional. Were it not for my extended family, grandparents and aunts, we would have sunk under the weight of adversity. I won't go into detail about all that again, but there was another family that meant a great deal to me during my high school years.

The family of one of my best friends, whom I talked to on the phone just last night, was like a second family to me. There were seven of them, five children and mother and father, and for various periods, one or another of the grandmothers living in. I loved them and they must have loved me, because they certainly let me hang around a lot. The truth is that if it could have been arranged between my parents and them, I would have gladly moved in with them.

My friend's mother was a devout Catholic convert. She went to 6:30 mass every morning and somehow managed to prepare a hot breakfast for the tribe, which often included me. She was a wonderful cook and made some of the best biscuits, pies, and cobblers that I've ever eaten in my life. All her cooking was excellent. I don't ever remember having a bad meal at her house. She cared for her husband and children, kept house, sewed, and kept the family business sideline going. The father was an accountant and worked at a day job, but he and his wife ran an accounting and tax business from their home. They had closed in their back porch and installed a huge key punch machine to do the accounting and tax work. This was in the 1950s, and the machine was, as I understand it, a specimen of early computer-like technology.

The father of the family was trying to learn Spanish, and I had studied Spanish in high school, so he spoke primitive Spanish to me, and, in my lame way, I tried to respond. His family was not at all interested in the Spanish language and were pretty much bored with his attempts to show off his skills for them, so I believe he was pleased to have someone respond. One of his favorite sayings to me, which I have never forgotten, was, "Tus ojos son las ventanas de tu alma," which I found a little disturbing. After all, what teenage girl wants an adult to be able to see into her soul?

The family had only one bathroom in their house, so you can imagine the line waiting to use the facilities, with someone often calling to whoever was in the room to hurry. If you passed in the hallway outside the bathroom when it was occupied by the father, you'd often hear him practicing trilling the Spanish "R". The family included three boys after my friend, all of whom were great teasers, and then, after several years, another baby girl. The father loved to tease, too, so it was a lively and laugh-filled household.

When they moved to their larger house, still with only one bathroom, I helped them remove the stain from the woodwork in the house, because they wanted to paint it, but, because of my impatience and poor skills, I'm afraid I gouged off more wood than stain with the paint scraper.

The father was a great lover of poetry, and he sometimes disciplined his children by making them learn verses of poetry. I see that as a good thing and a bad thing. On the one hand, the children committed a good bit of poetry to memory. On the other hand, the discipline may have put them off poetry, because it was associated with punishment. I thought it was kind of cool, because it seemed that I would not have considered it much of a punishment.

I remember that one night, my friend and I were double-dating, and when we went to her house to pick her up, she had not learned her poetry. Her father would not let her go out on her date until she had learned her verses, and she was terribly embarrassed to have us waiting around while she memorized her poetry.

My friend would invite me over after school. We'd do our homework, and then supper time would come, so she'd say, "Why don't you stay for supper?" and her mother would second the invitation. Then after supper, she'd say, "You might as well spend the night," which invitation her mother and father would second, and so I would. If the next day was a school day, I'd have to borrow a blouse from my friend. We wore white, long-sleeved blouses, even in the heat of our so-called spring and fall seasons, and navy pleated skirts. I'd wear my same skirt and the same bra and slip again (bras and slips don't get that soiled), and if the outside of my socks were dirty, I'd turn them inside out so the dirt wouldn't be visible. I was thinking the other day about underpants, and I don't remember what I did about them. Maybe I borrowed my friend's, or maybe I turned them inside out, too! Sometimes, but not often, one night would stretch into two nights.

The ritual before going to bed was for the family, and whoever else was there, to gather on the bed or on the floor in the parents bedroom to say the rosary.

My friend's mother lived until age 99, and she remained a feisty and independent woman, although she lost much of her vision. She loved to read, but once she no longer could, she listened to recordings of books, which the state library supplied by mail.

She lived on the Mississippi Gulf Coast then and lost her home in Katrina, but stayed serenely with her son who lived on the North Shore of Lake Pontchartrain until her death, for she did not live to move into the new house that she would have shared with her daughter, my friend. Her funeral was in Mississippi, and Grandpère was out of town at the time. Since I am phobic about driving on unfamiliar highways, I did not go to her funeral, and that broke my heart, for she was like another mother to me, and I loved her very much. Grandpère came to love her, too, for whenever we went to the Alabama or Florida beaches, we always stopped to see her on the way. I sent flowers, but they never arrived at the funeral home, so there was nothing of me there but my prayers and my love. My friend was kind and understanding about my absence, but I still grieve that I could not be there.

As I saw them, they were an ideal family, but I realize today, that all was not perfect. It never is, but they meant a great deal to me at a difficult time of my life. I feel a little heartsease about missing the funeral, for I see this account as something of a tribute to a great lady.

Sunday, March 8, 2009

As I Further Reread Gilead


As you may remember, after reading Marilynne Robinson's beautifully written novel, Home, I decided to reread her earlier novel, Gilead. The two quotes below once again illustrate her wonderful writing, which sometimes makes me cry at the sheer beauty of the way the words follow one upon another.

The Reverend Ames writes to his young son:

When people come to speak to me, whatever they say, I am struck by a kind of incandescence in them, the "I" whose predicate can be "love" or "fear" or "want," and whose object can be "something" or "nothing" and it really won't matter, because the loveliness is just in that presence shaped around "I" like a flame on a wick, emanating itself in grief and guilt and joy and whatever else. But quick and avid and resourceful. To see this aspect of life is a privilege of the ministry which is seldom mentioned. p. 44

The Reverend has a bad heart.

So I decided a little waltzing would be very good, and it was. I plan to do all my waltzing here in the study. I have thought I might have a book ready at hand to clutch if I began to experience unusual pain, so that it would have an especial recommendation from being found in my hands. That seemed theatrical, on consideration, and it might have the perverse effect of burdening the book with unpleasant associations. The ones I considered, buy the way, were Donne and Herbert and Barth's "Epistle to the Romans" and Volume II of Calvin's "Institutes". Which is by no means to slight Volume I. p. 115

O my! You might as well read the book before I quote the whole thing here at Wounded Bird.

Lapin Made Me Do It

Well, it's Sunday, and it's Lent, and I didn't even go to church today, and I shouldn't do it, but I will anyway.

Lapin directed me to the site of The International Center For Bathroom Etiquette. I was disappointed to note that the staff of the center consists only of males, however, it appears that the all-male staff is willing to receive input from women, since they claim to know nothing about women's bathroom etiquette, although some are married with children.

I grew up in a family of girls, and I suppose that my father had good bathroom etiquette (he was fastidious about quite a few matters). I have two sons, and when they were young, I learned quickly about a lack of bathroom etiquette. It seemed that as long as they were in the right room, then it was anything goes.

But I digress. Back to ICBE.

In their Women's Bathroom Issues I section I found this gem:

Nantarina writes:

On Going to the Bathroom in Groups:

It is not only appropriate for women to go in groups (preferably holding hands and giggling), it is severely reprehensible for a girl to go alone. For men, perhaps, hanging around and chatting to other men in public lavatories is to frowned upon. For ladies, however, the “bathroom” is a centre for socialising excellence. On many occasions, the best part of my evening out has consisted of those minutes (or, when my lovely friend was very very sick, hours) spent near the mirrors chatting and complimenting and borrowing make-up. This space provides a valuable haven in which to be updated on everything as it happens, and voice a preferably bitchy opinion.

It is also a nice place to chat to obviously never-to-be-seen again people and characters and you can get quick sudden glimpses into the lives and usually-all-the-same dreams (- to find a rich handsome etc etc) of people who have lives a million miles from your own and who wear clothes you wouldn’t be seen dead in, but if you did, would look a whole lot fucking sexier on you. But to fully use these facilities, it is necessary to arrive accompanied, or you may create the wrong impression. Particularly if you’re in a gay bar.

What is wholly unacceptable, I think, is when a girl says she needs the loo and nobody claims to want to go too. SERIOUSLY POOR ETIQUETTE! Consider your sisters!!!

(Apart from anything else, there are often shockingly long and boring queues)


From the spelling and the language, I'd guess that Natarina is not from the US. She could even be English, but she gets it right anyway, don't you think? In a group around a table especially, when one woman "needs to go", me included, the woman will ask or give a questioning look to other women in the group to see if any of them have a similar "need to go".

I want to say something about sad folks who have nothing better to do than make up websites for blog posts on silly (but funny) subjects, but when I think of a good many postings on this very blog, it's pot-kettle-black, and I can't go on. And if the folks who run those sites give me a laugh or two, then that makes their efforts worthwhile.

Check out the instructional logo for men on the top right sidebar.

Oops! No church Today!

No, we didn't do it. A few minutes ago, Grandpère said to me, "Weren't we supposed to set the clocks up?" Yes we were. No church for me today. The service is starting even as I write. I'll read the Lectionary and Morning Prayer in the prayer book. I'll miss the Eucharist, but not having it one Sunday makes me appreciate the blessing of our frequent Eucharistic services all the more.

My sermons for the day will come from the internet. I've already read one good one yesterday, which I linked to below.

Lord, have mercy.
Christ, have mercy.
Lord, have mercy.

UPDATE: From "The Daily Office":

Do not deceive yourselves. If you think that you are wise in this age, you should become fools so that you may become wise. For the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God. For it is written, 'He catches the wise in their craftiness,' 20and again, 'The Lord knows the thoughts of the wise, that they are futile.'

So let no one boast about human leaders. For all things are yours, whether Paul or Apollos or Cephas or the world or life or death or the present or the future-all belong to you, and you belong to Christ, and Christ belongs to God.
1 Corinthians 3:18-21

Suffrages B:

Save your people, Lord, and bless your inheritance;

Govern and uphold them, now and always.

Day by day we bless you;

We praise your name for ever.

Lord, keep us from all sin today;

Have mercy on us, Lord, have mercy.

Lord, show us your love and mercy;

For we put our trust in you.

In you, Lord, is our hope;

And we shall never hope in vain.

Not So Fast

Last week I went for a check-up to my regular optometrist and was told that I needed cataract surgery on my right eye. I knew that I had the beginnings of a cataract, but over the course of two years, it had grown to the point that I'm aware of glare more than I was previously, especially at night. I don't do highway driving at night anyway, but I do drive around town.

The optometrist said he could get me up to only 20/40 vision with glasses in the right eye, and he wanted me to schedule the surgery with the eye surgeon that he works with right then. I'm thinking, "Not so fast. 20/40 is not bad, if I see 20/20 in the left eye." My vision in the right eye still seems pretty good to me. I'm a little (not a lot) phobic about invasive medical interventions. I know what the surgery is like, because I watched on TV with a microscopic camera when my mother had the surgery. A tiny slit in the eye, the break-up of the lens by ultrasound, the pieces suctioned out, and then the placement of the new folded lens through the slit, and - voila! - it's done.

I want to check around to see if the optometrist's eye-surgeon associate has a good reputation around town. It seems to me that there's no rush, and I can take a little time to inquire about the surgeon and see if there is another surgeon in town who does the surgery who has an outstanding reputation. So that's what I shall do.

Saturday, March 7, 2009

Grandpère Is Not Impressed

Several members of my family are seriously disturbed by the economic downturn, close to freaking out, I'd say. We watch our nest eggs shrink day by day. One or two family members are quite concerned that they will lose their jobs. I'm concerned, too, but there's not much I can do to turn the economy around. We're headed for difficult times, but I know that many will be, and indeed already are, much worse off than we are.

My thought, which I expressed to Grandpère, is that we have no choice but to go through the bad times. Our only choice is to decide how we will live through the economic woes. We can try to do it with a measure of grace and dignity and with care and concern for those who are worse off than we are, or we can bitch and moan and cry out, "Woe is me!" over and over. Go through the tough times we will anyway, so let's do it with a bit of class. GP is not impressed by my thought.

Blog Posts You Should Read

For a while now I've been reading Bishop Alan's Blog. He is the Area Bishop of Buckinghamshire in England. I especially liked his post titled Reading the Bible 101. According to Bishop Alan, those who interpret the Bible in a literalist manner are latecomers in the history of Christianity.

The idea that the “factual/ original” meaning of a text is its only real one dates back to Benjamin Jowett in 1859, the year the Origin of Soecies was published. People who lived before then were not fools. Wooden fundamentalism about the Bible was not the only option before Darwin.

Read the comments to the post, because the discussion there is enlightening, too, especially Bishop Alan's long reply to one of the comments.

For the two or three of you who visit here and do not read Of Course I Could Be Wrong, I urge you to read MadPriest's sermon for the 2nd Sunday of Lent. The Lenten theme at his parish church this year is "The Marginalized".

MadPriest speaks of his own madness in connection with Jesus' words from the Gospel in which he says:

“If any want to become my followers, let them deny themselves and take up their cross and follow me. For those who want to save their life will lose it, and those who lose their life for my sake, and for the sake of the gospel, will save it.

Read the sermon. Read MadPriest's story. You won't be sorry. He says:

So, that is my burden. But I had other crosses to bare before it and it is almost certain I will have others in the future. And all of you will be carrying crosses, as well. Illness, abuse, sorrow, family duties, fear. The list seems endless. And I suppose we now have to ask the million dollar question. Does God impose these, sometimes unbearable, burdens upon us?

My answer to that question is a definite “no.” For God to do so he would have to contradict everything that Jesus told us about God and his relationship with us and his feelings, towards us. Our burdens are just part of life.


And last, but most certainly, not least, read Themethatisme's moving memories of the closing of the coal mines by Margaret Thatcher. This week is the 25th anniversary of those events. I remember the shock I felt over here, across the sea, when the announcement was made.

It may be just my perspective from the inside but when people asked me what is wrong with society today I am always tempted to talk about the strike. This was the first time on a national scale that the public saw a community destroyed. The uncertainty and lack of future that was intimated in such a destruction told forth that Mrs.Thatchers claim that there was no such thing as community, was a reality. Self-seeking individuality was the name of the game and anyone who acted collectively would be effectively frozen out or beaten into submission.

And isn't that the truth?

Go on now. Move along.

Friday, March 6, 2009

Who Amongst Us Is Without Sin?

In Chapter 10 of Mark's Gospel, Jesus speaks to the Pharisees and to his disciples about divorce, about allowing the children to come to him for blessings, and instructs those around him to come approach the Kingdom of God like a child.

Then came a man to Jesus asking the way to eternal life. Jesus lists the commandments. The man replies that he has kept the commandments from a young age. Then from the Gospel:

Jesus, looking at him, loved him and said, ‘You lack one thing; go, sell what you own, and give the money* to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; then come, follow me.’ When he heard this, he was shocked and went away grieving, for he had many possessions.

Every time I read that passage, I stand convicted. There are those who say that Jesus didn't really mean those words, that he meant that we should not be greedy and have possessions in excess. Society couldn't function if everyone literally followed those directives.

Of course, Jesus' words are impractical. Pragmatism was not Jesus' strong suit. Who amongst us is innocent, except the destitute and those who have given up their possessions to live and work amongst the poor? I believe that Jesus meant the words. Do I follow them? No, I do not. I could not have cast the first stone at the woman caught in adultery. Trust me; I am going somewhere with this besides lay sermonizing.

Those former and present members of the Episcopal Church who long for and attempt to build a pure church try in vain, "since all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God;" (Rom. 3:23) To attempt to build a pure church consisting of humans who have sinned and fallen short is simply not possible. The church is the Body of Christ and is sanctified by Christ himself, not by the beliefs or mistaken beliefs, or good or sinful acts or omissions of the imperfect members of the Body. The church is not my church, or your church, or their church, but God's church. We, the members of the church, put our faith and trust in a loving and merciful God to take us where we should go, not in purity of doctrines or "thou shalt nots" declared by imperfect human beings.

The reason that I am against a Covenant for the Anglican Communion is because we have the Covenant of God with his people in the Hebrew Testament, and we have Jesus building on that Covenant with the New Covenant of "love God, love your neighbor". What is lacking in the New Covenant? Why would we expect imperfect humans to come up with a superior, or even an equal covenant? We have the Baptismal Covenant and the Prayer Book which bind us together as Anglicans. What further need for a Covenant?

The man in the Gospel story went away grieving because of his many possessions, but, just as Jesus loved him when he spoke the words to him, he loved the man still when he walked away. And he loves us, just as we are, sinners all. In that love of God, I put my faith and hope.

My two cents, inspired by this post by Rmj at Adventus. Any mistakes here are my own and not attributable to Rmj.

UPDATE: I was late to the Lectionary today, and I found the readings pertinant to the words that I posted:

AM Psalm 95 & 40, 54
PM Psalm 51
Deut. 10:12-22
Heb. 4:11-16
John 3:22-36

What's He Gonna Be?

An old country preacher had a teenage son, and it was getting time the boy should give some thought to choosing a profession. But like many young men, the boy didn't really know what he wanted to do, and he didn't seem too concerned about it, either.

One day, while the boy was away at school, his father decided to try an experiment. He went into the boy's room and placed on his study table four objects: a Bible, a silver dollar, a bottle of whiskey, and a Playboy magazine.

"I'll just hide behind the door," the old preacher said to himself, "and when he comes home from school this afternoon, I'll see which object he picks up. If it's the Bible, he's going to be a preacher just like me and what a blessing that would be! If he picks up the dollar, he's going to be a businessman, and that would be okay, too. But if he picks up the bottle, he's going to be a no-good drunkard, and, Lord, what a shame that would be. And worst of all, if he picks up that magazine he's gonna be a skirt-chasin' bum."

The old man waited anxiously, and soon heard his son's footsteps as he entered the house whistling and headed for his room.

The boy tossed his books on the bed, and as he turned to leave the room he noticed the objects on the table. With curiosity in his eye, he walked over to inspect them. Finally, he picked up the Bible and placed it under his arm. Furtively looking around, he picked up the silver dollar and dropped it into his pocket. Then he uncorked the bottle and took a big drink as he sat down on his bed and opened up the magazine to the centerfold.

"Lord have mercy," the old preacher disgustedly whispered to himself, "he's gonna run for Congress!"


Don't blame me, blame Doug.