Thursday, October 29, 2009

On Bp. Lawrence's Address To The Special Convention in The Diocese Of South Carolina

On my first go at reading Bishop Mark Lawrence's address to the Special Convention of the Episcopal Diocese of North Carolina, I only made it to page 4 of the 9 pages, before I had to stop because the words disturbed me so. I thought to myself, "What a self-aggrandizing, self-pitying, self-justifying, disloyal load of bombast!" How could anyone listen for 40 minutes? Grandpère saw the print-out on the counter and read a bit of it and asked me, "What is this?" When I told him, he asked, "Do people listen to this?" Apparently so. The address received a standing ovation at the convention.

I took up the speech again and went through to the end, and I watched the video of the address. Nothing in the second reading or the video caused me to revise the words in my first paragraph.

"When the foundations are being destroyed, what can the righteous do?" (Ps 11:3)

After Bp. Lawrence quoted the verse for the fifth time, I got it. Truly, I did. Bp. Lawrence and his cohorts are "the righteous". He made his point. I understood. Oh, the humility! The rest of us are what? I can't say, but I gather that we are not the righteous.

Aside from kudzu, squirrels, wives who sleep in separate bedrooms from their husbands, trains, babies, and angels what is this address about?

Bp. Lawrence's charges against the Episcopal Church are grave, indeed.

Surely most of you know that I believe the foundations of The Episcopal Church and this Anglican way of being a Christian are being bit by bit destroyed.
....

This false teaching, that I have called the Gospel of Indiscriminate Inclusivity, has challenged the doctrine of the Trinity, the Uniqueness and Universality of Christ, the Authority of Scripture, our understanding of Baptism, and now that last refuge of order, our Constitutions and Canons. (This is the kudzu.)
....

The General Convention has become the problem. It has replace a balanced piety in this Church with the politics of one-dimensional activism.

The bishop mentions the loss of membership since 1968, "a 44% decline one generation" (a generation as the Bible defines it).

He compares the Episcopal Church to a train that "is moving fast toward a station where many of us in this diocese do not want to go. We fear the track this train is on - this train ain't bound for glory, this train." He wonders "how long the average Episcopalian will just sit there and let this trainload of radical activism roll them along to a dead end station".

Bp. Lawrence apparently did not notice that much of this was happening, because he was busy being faithful to his tasks, which he details, (They were many!) and plowing his fields.

And yet, and yet, in 2007, when he was asked to submit his name as a candidate for bishop on the "train that ain't bound for glory", the present Bishop Lawrence said, "Yes"! Was he still unaware of the sorry condition of the church in which he was possibly to be a bishop? What did he know, and when did he know it?

After a second round of voting in the House of Bishops and the House of Deputies diocesan Standing Committes, (the first round having resulted in a vote to withhold consent) consent was given to Bp. Lawrence, after he reaffirmed, with stronger emphasis than before the initial vote, his intention to remain loyal to TEC. He was ordained Bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of North Carolina on January 26, 2008.

From the Ordination Rite for a bishop in the Book of Common Prayer:

The Examination
All now sit, except the bishop-elect, who stands facing the bishops. The Presiding Bishop addresses the bishop-elect

My brother, the people have chosen you and have affirmed their trust in you by acclaiming your election. A bishop in God’s holy Church is called to be one with the apostles in proclaiming Christ’s resurrection and interpreting the Gospel, and to testify to Christ’s sovereignty as Lord of lords and King of kings.

You are called to guard the faith, unity, and discipline of the Church; to celebrate and to provide for the administration of the sacraments of the New Covenant; to ordain priests and deacons and to join in ordaining bishops; and to be in all things a faithful pastor and wholesome example for the entire flock of Christ.

With your fellow bishops you will share in the leadership of the Church throughout the world. Your heritage is the faith of patriarchs, prophets, apostles, and martyrs, and those of every generation who have looked to God in hope. Your joy will be to follow him who came, not to be served, but to serve, and to give his life a ransom for many.

Are you persuaded that God has called you to the office of bishop?

Answer

I am so persuaded.

The following questions are then addressed to the bishop-elect by one or more of the other bishops

Bishop [Lawrence]

Will you accept this call and fulfill this trust in obedience to Christ?
Answer

I will obey Christ, and will serve in his name.

Bishop [Lawrence]

Will you be faithful in prayer, and in the study of Holy Scripture, that you may have the mind of Christ?
Answer

I will, for he is my help.

Bishop [Lawrence]

Will you boldly proclaim and interpret the Gospel of Christ, enlightening the minds and stirring up the conscience of your people?
Answer

I will, in the power of the Spirit.

Bishop [Lawrence]

As a chief priest and pastor, will you encourage and support all baptized people in their gifts and ministries, nourish them from the riches of God’s grace, pray for them without ceasing, and celebrate with them the sacraments of our redemption?
Answer

I will, in the name of Christ, the Shepherd and Bishop of our souls.

Bishop [Lawrence]

Will you guard the faith, unity, and discipline of the Church of God?
Answer

I will, for the love of God.

Bishop [Lawrence]

Will you share with your fellow bishops in the government of the whole Church; will you sustain your fellow presbyters and take counsel with them; will you guide and strengthen the deacons and all others who minister in the Church?
Answer

I will, by the grace given me.

Bishop [Lawrence]

Will you be merciful to all, show compassion to the poor and strangers, and defend those who have no helper?
Answer

I will, for the sake of Christ Jesus.

All stand. The Presiding Bishop then says

[Mark], through these promises you have committed yourself to God, to serve his Church in the office of bishop. We therefore call upon you, chosen to be a guardian of the Church’s faith, to lead us in confessing that faith.


As you read on, keep in mind that Bp. Lawrence freely chose to answer, "I am so persuaded" and "I will" to the questions included in the Ordination Rite.

Bp. Lawrence says:

I put forward what I believe ought to be four unswerving principles to guide us: The Lordship of Christ and the Sufficiency of Scripture; Godly Boundaries; Domestic Engagement for Missional Relationships; and Emerging 21st Century Anglicanism.
....

Then there is the question often posed to me - if your intention bishop is to more thoroughly engage the "national" church and the culture and the culture, how does withdrawing from certain bodies of the Church enable us to more fully engage? To that question I say three things - first, remember there are four principles.... Secondly, most of us at some point in our lives have found ourselves in a dysfunctional system or relationship. We eventually recognized the need for appropriate boundaries. It is the only way to remain engaged with the family or system that embodies the dysfunction. Thirdly, it is the very withdrawing that facilitates the engagement.

As to Bp. Lawrence's four guiding principles, what is his difficulty with the Episcopal Church and his first principle? I don't see a problem. The Episcopal Church affirms the Lordship of Jesus Christ and the Sufficiency of Scripture. The remaining three of his principles are mushy in meaning, although those like-minded to him may understand more than I what he's getting at. Maybe he uses code language.

Did Bp. Lawrence have in mind, from the beginning, when he assented to be a candidate for bishop in the Episcopal Church and when he made his ordination vows to "guard the faith, unity, and discipline of the Church of God" and to "share with your fellow bishops in the government of the whole Church" to engage by disengagement with the church in which he made those vows?

I'm curious to know if the diocese will disengage with the pension plan. It's surely tainted, because partnered gay and lesbian clergy and bishops participate in the plan. I'm also curious as to whether Bp. Lawrence's stance in keeping a toe in the door of the Episcopal Church has to do with property settlements which, in overwhelming numbers, are being decided by the courts in favor of the national church.

To claim to remain in a church, all the while undermining that same church on every possible occasion with accusations of false teaching and destruction of the foundations of the church, is a strange sort of loyalty. Their decision to disengage with much of the governance and many of the programs of the Episcopal Church, leaves the leadership of the diocese skating on thin ice, indeed.

Story Of The Day - Legacy

I promise you not a moment will be lost
as long as I have heart & voice to speak
& we will walk again together with a
thousand others & a thousand more &
on & on until there is no one among us
who does not know the truth: there is
no future without love.



Ah, now this one is lovely, isn't it? One of their best.

From StoryPeople.

Got Stopped For Speeding

GOT STOPPED FOR SPEEDING
THE OTHER DAY.
I THOUGHT
I COULD TALK
MY WAY OUT OF IT
UNTIL THE COP LOOKED AT
MY DOG IN THE BACK SEAT

One Sign You're Driving Too Fast........







Thanks to Ann.

Wednesday, October 28, 2009

Story Of The Day - Theory

trying to remember when it stopped
being theory & turned into real life,
because theory was a whole lot easier



From StoryPeople.

At The Movies - The Venetian Bar


From the Daily Comet:

THIBODAUX — A local eatery traveled back in time Tuesday morning, acting as the setting for a post-World War II meeting between two French women married to American servicemen.

The Venetian Bar and Doughnut Shop, 401 Jackson St., was transformed into an Alabama diner circa 1946. Outside the shop, cars normally parked nearby were replaced by three sets of lights and two trucks hauling movie equipment. The street was silent, except for the words “rolling” and “quiet on the set.”

It was all part of local filmmaking couple Glen Pitre and Michelle Benoit’s latest project, “Chesterfield,” which depicts life for three American military men who marry French brides following D-Day. Pitre and Benoit are serving as executive producers.
....

Pitre’s cousin, Billy Pitre, recommended he and his wife check out the Venetian Bar as a potential set. Everybody who saw it marveled at how it resembles a World War II-era diner, Glen Pitre said.


Grandpère eats at the Venetian Bar. They make good po-boys, and he likes their crawfish stew, shrimp stew, and red beans and white beans and rice lunches. I've eaten there a few times, but it feels more like a man's eatery to me.

I know Glen Pitre, the film man. I haven't seen him in a while, and I'm not sure I've met his wife, Michelle, but I think I must have. Their film company is Côte Blanche Productions. He made a film at Sundance Institute, Robert Redford's production company, titled Belizaire the Cajun, his first English-language movie. We saw several of what Glen calls his Gumbo Westerns, La Fievre Jaune and Huit Piastres Et Demie!, for sure, and enjoyed them. We knew a good many of the actors in the movies, since most, if not all, were local people.

Chris Wood - "Cold, Haily, Windy Night"



Chris Wood performing at the Dent Folk Festival.

Tim Chesterton, at To See And To Follow, posted the video, and I liked it, and I stole it. Tim stole it from YouTube, and I thought it would be all right to steal from a thief.

Chris plays nice guitar, doesn't he, and I like his singing, too. The old folk song is a bit naughty. Enjoy!

A Story Of Two Doctors

Two doctors opened an office in a small town and put up a sign reading "Dr. Smith and Dr. Jones: Psychiatry and Proctology."

The town council was not too happy with that sign, so the doctors changed it to "Hysterias and Posteriors".

This was not acceptable either, so in an effort to satisfy the council, they changed the sign to "Schizoids and Hemorrhoids." No go.

Next they tried "Catatonics and High Colonics." Thumbs down again.

Then came "Manic-depressives and Anal Retentives." Still not good.

How about "Minds and Behinds"? Unacceptable again.

So they tried "Lost Souls and Ass Holes." Still no go.

Nor did "Analysis and Anal Cysts," "Nuts and Butts," "Freaks and Cheeks," or "Loons and Moons" work either.

Almost at their wits' end, the doctors finally came up with a business slogan they thought might be acceptable to the council: "Dr. Smith and Dr. Jones: Odds and Ends."

APPROVED!


Don't blame me. Blame Paul (A.), and I mean that. It's not my fault.

Help Save Padre Mickey's Dance Party

From The Friends of Jake:

Our own Padre Mickey (the Rev. Michael Dresbach) has had a bit of a cyber-tragedy. It seems his loyal Mac Mini has given up the ghost and requires a new logic board. At $600, this repair is virtually the same cost as a new computer, and is way beyond what they can afford as missionaries in Panama.

The Friends of Jake links to the website of St. Francis Episcopal Church in San José, California, where you can make a donation to help El Padre. The congregation supports him in his missionary work in Panama.

It's A Jungle In Here

 

The hibiscus are overgrown and out of control.


 

The potted plant became a vine that attached itself to brick and grows and grows and grows.


 

I fear that one night while we are asleep, the vine may invade our house and strangle us in our bed.



The bees took over the hummingbird feeder. But we need the bees, too.

Did I say that it was a jungle in here?

Hans Kung On The Vatican Overture

From the Guardian:

After Pope Benedict XVI's offences against the Jews and the Muslims, Protestants and reform-oriented Catholics, it is now the turn of the Anglican communion.... Traditionalists of the churches, unite! Under the cupola of St Peter's! The Fisher of Men is angling in waters of the extreme religious right.
....

Clearly, the well-meaning Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, was no match for cunning Vatican diplomacy. In his cosying up with the Vatican, he evidently did not recognise the consequences. Otherwise he would not have put his signature to the downplaying communique of the Catholic Archbishop of Westminster. Can it be that those caught in the Roman dragnet do not see that they will never be more than second-class priests in the Roman church, that other Catholics are not meant to take part in their liturgical celebrations?
....

But Pope Benedict is set upon restoring the Roman imperium. He makes no concessions to the Anglican communion. On the contrary, he wants to preserve the medieval, centralistic Roman system for all ages – even if this makes impossible the reconciliation of the Christian churches in fundamental questions.
....

Just as we have seen over many centuries – in the east-west schism of the 11th century, in the 16th century Reformation and in the First Vatican Council of the 19th century – the Roman thirst for power divides Christianity and damages its own church. It is a tragedy.

During the papacy of John Paul II, Kung was one of many fine theologians, teachers, and progressive bishops who were silenced or otherwise disciplined by the former Cardinal Ratzinger (and present pope) from his position as prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, which began life as the Supreme Sacred Congregation of the Universal Inquisition in the 16th century, although its practices were enforced centuries before. In 1908, the name was changed.

From the National Catholic Reporter on the then Cardinal Ratzinger, aka as The Enforcer:

Others believe Ratzinger will be remembered as the architect of John Paul’s internal Kulturkampf, intimidating and punishing thinkers in order to restore a model of church -- clerical, dogmatic and rule-bound -- many hoped had been swept away by the Second Vatican Council, the 1962-65 assembly of bishops that sought to renew Catholicism and open it to the world. Ratzinger’s campaign bears comparison to the anti-modernist drive in the early part of the century or Pius XII’s crackdown in the 1950s, critics say, but is even more disheartening because it followed a moment of such optimism and new life.

The piece in the NCR, from April 1999, is a long, but fascinating read. It includes these words:

There is still the possibility, of course, that Ratzinger will not end his career as the hierarchy’s No. 2 man. At some point there will be another conclave, and Ratzinger, if he’s still around, will be in the running for the top job. Could he become pope?

We all know the answer to that question.

UPDATE: Wormwood's Doxy said...

Too bad that Dr. Kung ruined what was otherwise a very good analysis/rant with the inclusion of this piece of tripe:

[The Anglican Communion] is already suffering from the consequences of the heedless and unnecessary election of an avowed gay priest as bishop in the US, an event that split his own diocese and the whole Anglican communion. This friction has been enhanced by the ambivalent attitude of the church's leadership with respect to homosexual partnerships. Many Anglicans would accept a civil registration of such couples with wide-ranging legal consequences, for instance in inheritance law, and would even accept an ecclesiastical blessing for them, but they would not accept a "marriage" in the traditional sense reserved for partnerships between a man and a woman, nor would they accept a right to adoption for such couples.

Heedless and unnecessary for WHOM?!

And I know a whole bunch of "Anglicans" who are working very hard for both civil and religious marriage (and adoption rights) for same-sex couples.

Feh.
Doxy


Doxy is correct. I should have called attention to that serious misstep by Fr. Kung in an otherwise accurate assessment of the pope's overture.