Friday, August 8, 2008

My Therapy Session

For now, I seem to be mentally blocked from posting anything substantial until I tackle the specific parts that trouble me the most in the The Archbishop of Canterbury's concluding Presidential Address at the Lambeth Conference. If you like you can skip this post and write it off as my therapy session, because it will, very likely, be boring to most people.

The archbishop says:

What I am saying, in effect, is that every association of Christian individuals and groups makes some sort of ‘covenant’ for the sake of mutual recognition, mutual gratitude and mutual learning.

Of course we do. First of all, we have the New Covenant of Our Lord Jesus Christ, "You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your strength, and with all your mind; and your neighbour as yourself." We have the Creeds, in which we affirm our beliefs each time we gather in a Eucharistic celebration. Then, we have the Baptismal Covenant. Each time a Baptism takes place in a church, those baptized and the members of the congregation who are present affirm the Baptismal Covenant. Why another covenant? I don't see the need.

But let me turn briefly to another dimension of all this, so as to draw in considerations of other matters we’ve discussed. I have just said something of what might be involved in a covenanted future, and I believe - as I said on Thursday - that it has the potential to make us more of a church; more of a ‘catholic’ church in the proper sense, a church, that is, which understands its ministry and service and sacraments as united and interdependent throughout the world.

Now I find that statement downright scary. One of the reasons that I moved from the Roman Catholic Church to the Episcopal Church was my discomfort with the top-down governance in the RCC. This statement increases my suspicion that the archbishop and others in positions of authority want to move toward a more authoritarian structure in the Anglican Communion.

Speaking for myself, I don't want to be a world-wide Anglican Church. I want to remain an Anglican Communion. The world-wide Anglican Church is a pretty big pill to swallow, especially after the archbishop has already said:

A fellow-Christian may believe they have a profound fresh insight. They seek to persuade others about it. A healthy church gives space for such exchanges. But the Christian with the new insight can’t claim straight away that this is now what the Church of God believes or intends; and it quite rightly takes a long time before any novelty can begin to find a way into the public liturgy, even if it has been widely agreed. Confusion arises when what is claimed as a new discernment presents itself as carrying the Church’s authority.

The archbishop seems to be pushing a fresh insight, so how can he "claim straight away that this is now what the" Anglican Communion intends? Of course, the archbishop uses the expression "Church of God", instead of Anglican Communion, which confuses me further. "Church of God", "world-wide Anglican Church", Anglican Communion, which is it?

In 1998, the Windsor Report called for the moratoria on same-sex blessings and consecration of new bishops in faithful, partnered same-sex relationships. In 2008, the archbishop asks for the same moratoria. For how long? Ten more years? Until the next Lambeth? Until the "mind of the church" comes together? Until kingdom come?

But that’s a powerful reminder that a global church and a global faith are not just about managing internal controversy. Our global, Catholic faith affirms that the image of God is the same everywhere - in the Zimbabwean woman beaten by police in her own church, in the manual scavenger in India denied the rights guaranteed by law; in the orphan of natural disaster in Burma, in the abducted child forced into soldiering in Northern Uganda, in the hundreds of thousands daily at risk in Darfur and Southern Sudan, in the woman raising a family in a squatters’ settlement in Lima or Buenos Aires. This is the Catholic faith : that what is owed to them is no different from, no less than what is owed to any of the rest of us. That was the faith to which we witnessed in our march in London. And if the message of this Conference is silent about this, something has gone very wrong.

Aside from the "global church" thingy, it's a fine statement of what the Anglican Communion should be about, except that he neglects to mention the affirmation of "the image of God" in those who are arrested, tortured, beaten, and killed, even in his own land and my land, in the name of homophobia. What about them, Archbishop Williams?

In the months to come, we will see, according the archbishop, the appointment of a Pastoral Forum to support minorities (which minorities?), an Anglican Consultative Council meeting, a Primates Meeting, and a meeting of the Joint Standing Committee of the Primates and the ACC. In addition, in the year 2009, the Episcopal Church will meet at General Convention. Many meetings. We shall see.

Well, that seems to be enough for now. Catharsis! Perhaps, now I can move on.

Just The Headline

"Mayor says NOAH Probe reveals some 'discrepancies'"

Read the article and weep. A related post on the subject is here.

UPDATE: Edited to provide a link to the article. Duh!

UPDATE 2: According to WWL-TV, the FBI, HUD, and the US Attorney's office have begun an investigation into NOAH's "discrepancies".

Friday Words From Maxine


And another.


Same source as below. It's silly Friday so far.

It's The Pen In The End

A very tired nurse walks into a bank,

Totally exhausted after an 18-hour shift.

Preparing to write a check,

She pulls a rectal thermometer out of her purse

And tries to write with it.

When she realizes her mistake,

She looks at the flabbergasted teller

And without missing a beat, she says:

"Well, that's great....that's just great....

Some asshole's got my pen!"


From Doug.

Thursday, August 7, 2008

I'll Be There


Rising Tide III, A Conference On the Future of New Orleans, August 22-24

This year will be my third attendance at the conference. The first two were very good, and this year's conference promises to be even better. I met all the "need-to-know" New Orleans bloggers there, along with bloggers who come from a distance, because they care about New Orleans and continue write about it, so the country does not forget the tragedy of Katrina and the federal flood and the disastrous aftermath of neglect, corruption, and abuse by the powers of government at every level. The bloggers are a great bunch. I won't name names, because I'm sure to leave someone out.

I've read the excellent book by keynote speaker, John Barry, Rising Tide: The Great Mississippi Flood of 1927 and How It Changed America.

If you're in the neighborhood, or even if you're not, you might want to plan to be there. You can register through PayPal at the link above.

"Oh Really, O'Reilly?"



Video from Robert Greenwall at Fox Attacks.

A Crying Shame

From the New Orleans Times-Picayune:

Doris Grandpre knows exactly who gutted her 7th Ward house last year, then helped her start rebuilding the single shotgun where she lived for three decades before Hurricane Katrina.

"There was David. You got Christopher. Then there was Jason. Oh, and Simon," Grandpre, 76, said this week, recalling the student volunteers who came from Boston and Seattle to tear out her plaster walls and save the few precious items the flood did not destroy.

"I call them my little angels," she said.

It appears, however, that another crew has taken credit for demolition work at Grandpre's house. City records show that Hall & Hall Enterprises, the highest-paid contractor in Mayor Ray Nagin's home remediation program, billed the city $7,830 for gutting and boarding up the house and cutting the grass at the St. Anthony Street property.

The house is one of at least seven addresses that appear on two lists detailing post-storm remediation. One list belongs to the Episcopal Diocese of Louisiana's Office of Disaster Response, which organized volunteers from across the country to come to New Orleans and provide free home remediation services, such as gutting and boarding up homes, to residents in need of help.


The level of corruption, incompetence, and lack of oversight by the city officials in New Orleans is mind-boggling. Think FEMA on a smaller scale. No wonder folks get Katrina fatigue. The Jericho Road program of the the Episcopal Diocese of Louisiana works to provide housing for the people of New Orleans and organize the many volunteers who have given generously of their time and talents, and both groups have done great work, only to have contractors paid for work they did not do.

On Tuesday the Times-Picayune reported:

Stacey Jackson, the embattled former director of a city-financed program [NOAH] aimed at easing blight, bought four blighted properties herself through another city program two years ago but has done little or nothing to get them back into commerce.

Just last month, a company controlled by Jackson and her sister sold one of the four properties, an empty double lot at 1925-31 Sixth St., to a charity group that has been praised by City Hall and others for building new homes for first-time buyers in Central City.

The charity, Jericho Road Episcopal Housing Initiative, paid Jackson's company $20,000 for the land, three times what Jackson paid for it in 2006. As it happens, Jericho Road had been trying to get control of the land back then, but lost out to Jackson.

In fact, Jericho Road thought it had the property in 2006, having been awarded it by City Hall under a program designed to give nonprofit groups land adjudicated to the city because of unpaid taxes. But as the Jericho Road was trying to clear title to the Sixth Street property, the group learned the land was unavailable because Jackson had already staked a claim on it with the New Orleans Redevelopment Authority, according to Brad Powers, Jericho Road's executive director.

Powers, whose group has built about 17 houses in the neighborhood since Hurricane Katrina, said he is glad Jericho Road finally purchased the double lot, where it will build two houses. But Powers said he regrets that the difference in the 2006 price and the 2008 price will accrue to Jackson, when his group could have spent it instead on building more affordable housing.

"Is it painful to have to spend $20,000" knowing the history? he asked rhetorically. "Yes, it's painful."


I'm sure it's painful, and it's a travesty that this sort of operation was allowed to continue for so long. How about reparation money from Stacey Jackson to the Jericho Road program? I'll wager my blood pressure soared to new heights as I wrote this post.

I hope that this news does not discourage the workers and volunteers in the Jericho Road program. From this one relatively small program, the result is 17 families in homes of their own, with more to come.

Comments Disappear

Is anyone else on Blogger having problems with comments disappearing? I know that they come in, because I get an email for each comment, but they don't show up on the blog, or they disappear after posting. I don't want folks to think I'm deleting their comments. My post "Colonialism and Anti-Colonialism" had comments, and now they're gone. Note to all: It's not me. It's Blogger

Wednesday, August 6, 2008

Time For Wisdom From Maxine


And one more.


Thanks to the ever-faithful Doug.

Another Anniversary


Today, we celebrate the Feast of the Transfiguration, and we remember with great sadness the bombing of Hiroshima. Today is also the seventh anniversary of the now well-known, but ignored at the time, Presidential Daily Briefing, titled “Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S.”

Bush was at the ranch in Crawford and remained there throughout August, cutting brush, jogging, celebrating his birthday, and reading books. What's the big deal, right?

Thanks for the memory to Think Progress.