GWB Library to Open in 2009
The George W. Bush Presidential Library is now in the planning stages. The Library will include:
The Hurricane Katrina Room, which is still under construction.
The Alberto Gonzales Room, where you won't be able to remember anything.
The Texas Air National Guard Room, where you don't even have to show up.
The Walter Reed Hospital Room, where they don't let you in.
The Guantanamo Bay Room, where they don't let you out.
The Weapons of Mass Destruction Room, which no one has been able to find.
The National Debt room which is huge and has no ceiling.
The 'Tax Cut' Room with entry only to the wealthy.
The 'Economy Room' which is in the toilet.
The Iraq War Room. After you complete your first tour, they make you to go back for a second, third, fourth, and sometimes fifth tour.
The Dick Cheney Room, in the famous undisclosed location,complete with shotgun gallery.
The Environmental Conservation Room, still empty.
The Supreme Court's Gift Shop, where you can buy an election.
The Airport Men's Room, where you can meet some of your favorite Republican Senators.
The 'Decider Room' complete with dart board, magic 8-ball, Ouija board, dice, coins, and straws.
The museum will also have an electron microscope to help you locate the President's accomplishments.
That sounds about right. What do you think?
From Doug.
Friday, August 22, 2008
The Girls And The Finger
This morning, I went to the Friday school mass at the Roman Catholic Church to which the school that two of my grandchildren attend is attached. My granddaughter was carrying up the gifts, and I wanted to be there. The Irish priest who is the pastor of the parish is quite good with the children. He has, in the past, given sermons that were paeans of praise to George W. Bush, but he did not do so today, thanks be to God, because, when he does, he puts me rather fully off my spiritual balance for the rest of the mass.
Today was the feast of Mary, Queen of Heaven. There was much talk of Mary as queen and Mary's queenship. I wonder what Mary, in her bliss in the heavenly kingdom, thinks of this talk of her queenship. She probably smiles indulgently and says, "There they go again." I think of "The Song of Mary", the magnificent "Magnificat", in which Mary sings the praises of God:
He has shown strength with his arm;
he has scattered the proud in the thoughts of their hearts.
He has brought down the powerful from their thrones,
and lifted up the lowly;
he has filled the hungry with good things,
and sent the rich away empty.
Of course, God highly exalted the young Jewish girl by calling her to the awesome task of mothering Jesus, the God-Man. I love and honor Mary greatly, nevertheless, in my humble opinion, the talk of her queenship may not be entirely to her liking. Of course, I could be wrong.
The Gospel today was the story of the angel Gabriel announcing to Mary that she was to be the mother of the Son of the Most High. Instead of reading the Gospel, Fr. Irish gave a brief paraphrase of the Gospel story, either extemporaneously or from memory. The paraphrase was quite good, and yet, I would like for the children to have heard the actual Gospel, perhaps with the excellent paraphrase following.
Several recitations of the "Hail Mary" were interspersed throughout the mass, which is a new practice since I moved to the Episcopal Church. Perhaps these additions are according to Fr. Irish's personal preference and not in general use.
A couple of the hymns were oldies which I remembered verbatim, such as "Immaculate Mary" and "Salve Regina", which I rather like singing, although the sentiments are not entirely mine. For some reason, the theology expressed in hymns doesn't seem to greatly affect my liking for them.
The picture above is the rear view of the three girls who carried up the gifts. My granddaughter is in the center. The picture below was to be the front view of the girls, but I was in a hurry, and what I got is my middle finger and a blur. Here it is, readers, my middle finger.
Thursday, August 21, 2008
I Have Many Mansions
The Real McCain video received in an email from Robert Greenwald of Brave New Films Team. Pass it around.
From Politico:
Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) said in an interview Wednesday that he was uncertain how many houses he and his wife, Cindy, own.
"I think — I'll have my staff get to you," McCain told Politico in Las Cruces, N.M. "It's condominiums where — I'll have them get to you."
Anti-Gay Bias Order Left To Die
From the Baton Rouge, Louisiana, Advocate:
Calling the executive order unnecessary, Gov. Bobby Jindal said Wednesday he would not reissue a ban on discriminating against gays and lesbians in the workplace.
“We are not going to renew it and that shouldn’t come as a surprise to anybody,” Jindal said about the executive order signed by then-Gov. Kathleen Blanco in December 2004. The order, which some church groups and Jindal have criticized over the years, is set to expire Friday.
It's true. There's no real surprise here, but much to be regretted. Family Forum virtually runs the governor's office and the legislature here in Louisiana, and they did not want the ban on discrimination because of sexual orientation to continue.
Jindal’s decision means “it is perfectly legal to fire anyone based on their sexual orientation even if they are a perfect employee,” said Randy Evans, a New Orleans lawyer who is co-political director of Forum for Equality, a New Orleans-based political action committee for the lesbian and gay community in Louisiana.
The executive order provided predictability and safety for gay and lesbian employees, he said.
That's exactly right. But Family Forum says we can't have that.
Louisiana Family Forum is a group that seeks to “persuasively present biblical principles” in political and other issues. During the campaigns last year, the group’s leaders told Jindal and some legislators running for office, how disappointed they were in Blanco for signing the executive order, said Gene Mills of Baton Rouge, the group’s executive director.
“Gov. Jindal comes from a different mindset, understanding the damage that this potentially poses to children and to the economy. He decided not to re-up that executive order but to simply let it sunset,” Mills said.
Damage to children and damage to the economy? How so? If the state is seen to oppose ALL discrimination, this will cause damage to children? What is the message? Discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation is good? Is that what you want your children to know? What about gay and lesbian young people? Is the message to them, "Get out. Relocate if you want to climb the ladder of success. Louisiana is not a good place for you?"
With respect to the economy, it seems to me that a decision like this is a blow to developing a more welcoming environment for businesses to locate here. The message is what? We want you to come, and you can discriminate against gays and lesbians all you like. Does Jindal believe that gays and lesbians are not part of the workforce, that they do not contribute to the economy? I could go on, but I believe that you get my point.
A developing theocracy is a good description of Louisiana governance.
Calling the executive order unnecessary, Gov. Bobby Jindal said Wednesday he would not reissue a ban on discriminating against gays and lesbians in the workplace.
“We are not going to renew it and that shouldn’t come as a surprise to anybody,” Jindal said about the executive order signed by then-Gov. Kathleen Blanco in December 2004. The order, which some church groups and Jindal have criticized over the years, is set to expire Friday.
It's true. There's no real surprise here, but much to be regretted. Family Forum virtually runs the governor's office and the legislature here in Louisiana, and they did not want the ban on discrimination because of sexual orientation to continue.
Jindal’s decision means “it is perfectly legal to fire anyone based on their sexual orientation even if they are a perfect employee,” said Randy Evans, a New Orleans lawyer who is co-political director of Forum for Equality, a New Orleans-based political action committee for the lesbian and gay community in Louisiana.
The executive order provided predictability and safety for gay and lesbian employees, he said.
That's exactly right. But Family Forum says we can't have that.
Louisiana Family Forum is a group that seeks to “persuasively present biblical principles” in political and other issues. During the campaigns last year, the group’s leaders told Jindal and some legislators running for office, how disappointed they were in Blanco for signing the executive order, said Gene Mills of Baton Rouge, the group’s executive director.
“Gov. Jindal comes from a different mindset, understanding the damage that this potentially poses to children and to the economy. He decided not to re-up that executive order but to simply let it sunset,” Mills said.
Damage to children and damage to the economy? How so? If the state is seen to oppose ALL discrimination, this will cause damage to children? What is the message? Discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation is good? Is that what you want your children to know? What about gay and lesbian young people? Is the message to them, "Get out. Relocate if you want to climb the ladder of success. Louisiana is not a good place for you?"
With respect to the economy, it seems to me that a decision like this is a blow to developing a more welcoming environment for businesses to locate here. The message is what? We want you to come, and you can discriminate against gays and lesbians all you like. Does Jindal believe that gays and lesbians are not part of the workforce, that they do not contribute to the economy? I could go on, but I believe that you get my point.
A developing theocracy is a good description of Louisiana governance.
Wednesday, August 20, 2008
My Correspondence With Fr. Christian Troll
Imagine the thrill when I received a message that Fr. Christian Troll wanted to be my Facebook friend. So a-twitter with excitement was I, that I forgot my place as a woman, and thus an inferior person in every way, and mentioned to him that he had not answered a question that I sent in to his "Ask Fr. Christian!" feature on his GAFCON blog. Our correspondence at Facebook follows:
June Butler
Today at 8:52am
Fr Christian, I sent you a question weeks ago, and you never answered.
Christian Troll
Today at 9:45pm
My aplogies Madame Mimi - and I trust you understand how contrary it is to my principles to apologize for anything.
I'd like to claim I was simply following the traditional clergy tradition of ignoring pretty much everything others say to one, but the truth is my answer to your heartfelt cry concerning the complexity of wanting to be both banned from the next GAFCON soiree and attending in order to report and and partake of whatever largesse Big Pete has wrangled out wealthier dioceses was half completed and then sidelined in the wake of current events, until being eventually overlooked entirely.
Pending something really funny - like Martyn Minns being caught having a full-body wax - my oversight shall be redressed in the next 24 hours.
Now I pray, oh mystic enchantress, please don't follow through on any voodoo curses, and if you must insert pins in that cursed little effigy I kjnow you have of me, please drive them in s-l-o-w-l-y so that the blissful agony might be prolonged.
June Butler
Today at 10:41pm
Fr Christian, I know this is private correspondence, but it's of such excellence that the wider world should see it. It's presumptuous of me to ask, but would you consider allowing me to post it on my humble blog, with full credit to you for its excellence, of course, and a link to your blog? It would fit in nicely, if you really do post my question and your answer - that is, if there's no late-breaking hilarity that you feel you must cover.
I shall even correct your one small typo, knowing your insistence on perfection.
Christian Troll
Today at 10:52pm
My Dear Daughter of Eve:
I should be honored if you felt guided to share my sweet nothings with the broader world frequenting your place of residence. Doubtless they might be edified, and, dare I hope, brought to their knees in repentance.
You can tell them that the typo was undoubtedly the result of my experiencing a spiritual atack of such magnitude that a lesser man would felled instantly.
I intend to let the world know of my venture into Facebook in my next post, so feel free to publish whenever your animal nature deemss it appropriate.
As you can see, he graciously permitted me to post our correspondence. I decided against correcting the typos, because in such a man of Fr. Christian's perfection, these peccadillos are nothing less than endearing.
UPDATE: Fr. Christian has graciously answered my question from a long time past and even expanded on the question, as only he can, to enlighten us all in matters far beyond my question. That's his way. He's Father Christian and he teaches the Bible.
June Butler
Today at 8:52am
Fr Christian, I sent you a question weeks ago, and you never answered.
Christian Troll
Today at 9:45pm
My aplogies Madame Mimi - and I trust you understand how contrary it is to my principles to apologize for anything.
I'd like to claim I was simply following the traditional clergy tradition of ignoring pretty much everything others say to one, but the truth is my answer to your heartfelt cry concerning the complexity of wanting to be both banned from the next GAFCON soiree and attending in order to report and and partake of whatever largesse Big Pete has wrangled out wealthier dioceses was half completed and then sidelined in the wake of current events, until being eventually overlooked entirely.
Pending something really funny - like Martyn Minns being caught having a full-body wax - my oversight shall be redressed in the next 24 hours.
Now I pray, oh mystic enchantress, please don't follow through on any voodoo curses, and if you must insert pins in that cursed little effigy I kjnow you have of me, please drive them in s-l-o-w-l-y so that the blissful agony might be prolonged.
June Butler
Today at 10:41pm
Fr Christian, I know this is private correspondence, but it's of such excellence that the wider world should see it. It's presumptuous of me to ask, but would you consider allowing me to post it on my humble blog, with full credit to you for its excellence, of course, and a link to your blog? It would fit in nicely, if you really do post my question and your answer - that is, if there's no late-breaking hilarity that you feel you must cover.
I shall even correct your one small typo, knowing your insistence on perfection.
Christian Troll
Today at 10:52pm
My Dear Daughter of Eve:
I should be honored if you felt guided to share my sweet nothings with the broader world frequenting your place of residence. Doubtless they might be edified, and, dare I hope, brought to their knees in repentance.
You can tell them that the typo was undoubtedly the result of my experiencing a spiritual atack of such magnitude that a lesser man would felled instantly.
I intend to let the world know of my venture into Facebook in my next post, so feel free to publish whenever your animal nature deemss it appropriate.
As you can see, he graciously permitted me to post our correspondence. I decided against correcting the typos, because in such a man of Fr. Christian's perfection, these peccadillos are nothing less than endearing.
UPDATE: Fr. Christian has graciously answered my question from a long time past and even expanded on the question, as only he can, to enlighten us all in matters far beyond my question. That's his way. He's Father Christian and he teaches the Bible.
Swallowtail Butterfly?
When I went out to get my newspapers this morning, I saw this lovely creature feeding on our pentas. It flitted around so quickly, that it was difficult to get a picture, but I managed to capture this one. I believe it's a swallowtail, but, in an online search, I could not identify the species of this one.
Below is Raoul, the cat who owns my daughter and her family, in a regal profile pose. He's handsome, isn't he? He's also crazy, but once they're yours, you must love them.
GOTTA PEE (A QUICK READ)
Two women friends had gone for a girl's night out. Both were very faithful and loving wives, however they had gotten over-enthusiastic on the Bacardi Breezers.
Incredibly drunk and walking home they needed to pee, so they stopped in the cemetery. One of them had nothing to wipe with so she thought she would take off her panties and use them.
Her friend however was wearing a rather expensive pair of panties and did not want to ruin them. She was lucky enough to squat down next to a grave that had a wreath with a ribbon on it, so she proceeded to wipe with that.
After the girls did their business they proceeded to go home.
The next day one of the woman's husbands was concerned that his normally sweet and innocent wife was still in bed hung over, so he phoned the other husband and said: "These girls nights have got to stop! I'm starting to suspect the worst. My wife came home with no panties!!"
"That's nothing" said the other husband, "Mine came back with a card stuck to her ass that said..... 'From all of us at the Fire Station. We'll never forget you.'"
From my daughter. I don't know what happened. I tried to raise her right.
Incredibly drunk and walking home they needed to pee, so they stopped in the cemetery. One of them had nothing to wipe with so she thought she would take off her panties and use them.
Her friend however was wearing a rather expensive pair of panties and did not want to ruin them. She was lucky enough to squat down next to a grave that had a wreath with a ribbon on it, so she proceeded to wipe with that.
After the girls did their business they proceeded to go home.
The next day one of the woman's husbands was concerned that his normally sweet and innocent wife was still in bed hung over, so he phoned the other husband and said: "These girls nights have got to stop! I'm starting to suspect the worst. My wife came home with no panties!!"
"That's nothing" said the other husband, "Mine came back with a card stuck to her ass that said..... 'From all of us at the Fire Station. We'll never forget you.'"
From my daughter. I don't know what happened. I tried to raise her right.
Tuesday, August 19, 2008
Brueggemann DVD Series
I promised to get information for you on the Brueggemann lecture series on DVD that we are using in our adult Sunday school class. The title is Countering Pharaoh's Production-Consumption Society Today, and it can be purchased at Living the Questions.
Ominous New Poll
From The Huffington Post:
In a potentially ominous sign for the presumptive Democratic nominee, a new poll shows Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill) trailing far behind G.O.P. standard bearer Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz) among voters who identify themselves as racists.
....
The poll, conducted by Duh Magazine, suggests that Mr. Obama faces an uphill battle in his effort to win the votes of dyed-in-the-wool bigots.
"We wanted to know, why isn't Barack Obama closing the deal among racists?" said Charles Plugh, editor-in-chief of Duh. "The answer seems to be, because he's black."
Blame Doug for the link.
In a potentially ominous sign for the presumptive Democratic nominee, a new poll shows Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill) trailing far behind G.O.P. standard bearer Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz) among voters who identify themselves as racists.
....
The poll, conducted by Duh Magazine, suggests that Mr. Obama faces an uphill battle in his effort to win the votes of dyed-in-the-wool bigots.
"We wanted to know, why isn't Barack Obama closing the deal among racists?" said Charles Plugh, editor-in-chief of Duh. "The answer seems to be, because he's black."
Blame Doug for the link.
On Whether McCain Was In "A Cone Of Silence"
During the forum at Saddleback Church this past Saturday, John McCain, who appeared second for questioning, was not supposed to have been able to hear the questions and answers during Obama's time. Below is a transcript of one section of McCain's appearance.
WARREN: Let's deal with abortion. I, as a pastor, have to deal with this all the time, every different angle, every different pain, all of the decisions and all of that. Forty million abortions since Roe v. Wade. Some people, people who believe that life begins at conception, believe that's a holocaust for many people. What point is a baby entitled to human rights?
MCCAIN: At the moment of conception. (APPLAUSE). I have a 25- year pro-life record in the Congress, in the Senate. And as president of the United States, I will be a pro-life president. And this presidency will have pro-life policies. That's my commitment. That's my commitment to you.
WARREN: OK, we don't have to beleaguer on that one. Define marriage.
MCCAIN: A union -- a union between man and woman, between one man and one woman. That's my definition of marriage.
Could I -- are we going to get back to the importance of Supreme Court Justices or should I mention --
WARREN: We will get to that.
MCCAIN: OK. All right. OK.
WARREN: You're jumping ahead...
Thanks to Paul (A) for the link to AmericaBlog. As John Aravosis says:
Yes he is. But the only way to jump ahead is to know what's ahead. Then again, John McCain was a POW, so how dare we suspect him of cheating. Oh that's right, he cheated on his wife. But I'm sure he wouldn't cheat on a debate question. Wife, sure. Debate question? For McCain, that would be immoral.
John McCain wants to get back to where he's never been. That seems right in character.
WARREN: Let's deal with abortion. I, as a pastor, have to deal with this all the time, every different angle, every different pain, all of the decisions and all of that. Forty million abortions since Roe v. Wade. Some people, people who believe that life begins at conception, believe that's a holocaust for many people. What point is a baby entitled to human rights?
MCCAIN: At the moment of conception. (APPLAUSE). I have a 25- year pro-life record in the Congress, in the Senate. And as president of the United States, I will be a pro-life president. And this presidency will have pro-life policies. That's my commitment. That's my commitment to you.
WARREN: OK, we don't have to beleaguer on that one. Define marriage.
MCCAIN: A union -- a union between man and woman, between one man and one woman. That's my definition of marriage.
Could I -- are we going to get back to the importance of Supreme Court Justices or should I mention --
WARREN: We will get to that.
MCCAIN: OK. All right. OK.
WARREN: You're jumping ahead...
Thanks to Paul (A) for the link to AmericaBlog. As John Aravosis says:
Yes he is. But the only way to jump ahead is to know what's ahead. Then again, John McCain was a POW, so how dare we suspect him of cheating. Oh that's right, he cheated on his wife. But I'm sure he wouldn't cheat on a debate question. Wife, sure. Debate question? For McCain, that would be immoral.
John McCain wants to get back to where he's never been. That seems right in character.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)