This is the second time we are notifying you about your fund worth of $2.7 Million Via Atm Visa Card,Re-Comfirm your name,Address/tel is needed.
Dr.Paul Edward
Dr Paul, I wouldn't mind the $2.7 Million, but I won't be sending my information. Sorry.
This is the second time we are notifying you about your fund worth of $2.7 Million Via Atm Visa Card,Re-Comfirm your name,Address/tel is needed.
Dr.Paul Edward
The Covenant is "colonialist" document. It does not free the Asia church but keeps it controlled by English church.
When Monique Verdin wears her rented tuxedo to the Ellender High prom Saturday night, nobody will stand in her way.
Terrebonne Parish school officials said Monday they are backing off enforcement of a school-based rule — also contained in policies at the district's other three high schools — that mandates tuxes for boys and gowns for girls.
Verdin, 19, and her father, Jody Bergeron, were told Friday by the school's principal, Cory Butler, and high-schools supervisor Tony Authement that the teen would be allowed to buy a ticket to the prom but barred from entrance if she wore a tuxedo.
Authement confirmed Friday that the district planned to enforce the rule. On Monday, however, he said attorneys advised him the stance would be difficult to defend in court.
“We are going to allow her,” Authement said. “It was an easy call,” said attorney Berwick Duval, who represents the School Board. “It's a First Amendment issue.”
“It's a good thing,” the teenager said. “They shouldn't have put me through so much trouble like that.”
Authement said the rules mandating gender-specific dress for proms will likely be scrapped altogether.
I share your incomprehension that such an obviously destructive measure (to the Church of England as much as the Anglican Communion) should have got as far as it has. I also share your concern that we seem to be sleep-walking into acceptance, not wanting to rock the boat or ‘upset poor ++Rowan’.
In my view, it is pretty much a foregone conclusion that the bishops overall will be in favour of the Covenant – and this is why I find the Wakefield result worrying. Although the overall vote was against, you will have seen that both bishops were in favour. Although I know we have some bishops on our side, it seems to me that it is the old problem of turkeys being disinclined to vote for Christmas. First, and most obviously, it is ++Rowan who is largely responsible for their future careers and, secondly, the Covenant seeks to reassert the authority of the hierarchy to which they belong. The same considerations could also be said to apply to the clergy but luckily there are enough brave & independent-minded clerics around who are true to the moral demands of their calling, if I can put it that way. (My emphasis)
THE first English diocesan synod to debate the Anglican Covenant has rejected it. On Saturday, in Wakefield diocese, the vote was lost in the Houses of Laity (10 for, 23 against) and Clergy (16 for, 17 against, 1 abstention). Both Bishops voted for its adoption..
Take the Anglican Covenant, for instance. It is clear that many people in the Church of England are deeply suspicious of it. In the debate in General Synod last November many voices raised deep misgivings about it, even among the House of Bishops. In fact, enough people were sufficiently concerned to mean that if the vote was taken purely on what people thought, it would probably have been chucked out there and then.
Man who wants pretty nurse, must be patient.
Passionate kiss, like spider web, leads to undoing of fly.
Better to be pissed off than pissed on.
Lady who goes camping must beware of evil intent.
Man who leaps off cliff jumps to conclusion.
It takes many nails to build a crib, but one screw to fill it.
Man who stands on toilet is high on pot.
Man who eats many prunes get good run for money.